视觉搜索中对显著分心物的注意抑制:主动抑制还是反应抑制?
Attentional Suppression of Salient Distractors in Visual Search: Proactive or Reactive?
摘要: 注意如何抑制视野中的显著分心物主要有两种观点:主动抑制和反应抑制。注意抑制过程不仅受到自下而上物理显著性的影响,同时受到自上而下认知控制的调节。本文从自下而上和自上而下的角度论述影响注意抑制的因素。其可能是通过影响分心物显著性表征强度来影响注意抑制过程。未来研究可能需要明确刺激物理显著性的界定与测量,并利用ERP技术,通过刺激材料、搜索集大小、搜索策略等方式操纵分心物在视觉搜索中的相对显著性表征,以考察高显著性分心物能否被主动抑制。
Abstract: There are two controversial propositions regarding how salient distractors are suppressed in visual search: proactive and reactive suppression. Actually, attentional suppression is modulated not only by bottom-up physical saliency of distractor but also by top-down cognitive control. However, whether top-down cognitive control can reduce or even eliminate the characteristic gain brought about by the bottom-up physical saliency of the distractor itself still needs further research and demonstration. We discussed two views of suppression and thoroughly expound on the factors af-fecting attentional inhibition from the perspective of bottom-up and top-down, respectively. It may affect the attentional inhibition process by influencing the intensity of distractor significance char-acterization. Future research may require a clear definition and measurement of the physical sig-nificance of stimuli, and the use of ERP technology to manipulate the relative significance repre-sentation of distractors in visual search through stimulus materials, search set size, search strate-gies, and other methods, in order to examine whether highly significant distractors can be proac-tively suppressed.
文章引用:张悦 (2023). 视觉搜索中对显著分心物的注意抑制:主动抑制还是反应抑制?. 心理学进展, 13(9), 3726-3732. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2023.139465

参考文献

[1] Adam, K. C. S., Patel, T., Rangan, N., & Serences, J. T. (2021). Classic Visual Search Effects in an Additional Singleton Task: An Open Dataset. Journal of Cognition, 4, Article 34.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Adams, O. J., Ruthruff, E., & Gaspelin, N. (2023). Oculomotor Suppression of Abrupt Onsets versus Color Singletons. Attention, Perception, & Psy-chophysics, 85, 613-633.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Bacon, W. F., & Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 485-496.[CrossRef
[4] Barras, C., & Kerzel, D. (2017). Salient-but-Irrelevant Stimuli Cause Atten-tional Capture in Difficult, but Attentional Suppression in Easy Visual Search. Psychophysiology, 54, 1826-1838.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Chang, S., & Egeth, H. E. (2019). Enhancement and Suppression Flexibly Guide Attention. Psychological Science, 30, 1724-1732.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Chang, S., Niebur, E., & Egeth, H. E. (2021). Standing out in a Small Crowd: The Role of Display Size in Attracting Attention. Visual Cognition, 29, 587-591.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Chen, X., Xu, B., Chen, Y., Zeng, X., Zhang, Y., & Fu, S. (2023). Saliency Affects Attentional Capture and Suppression of Abrupt-Onset and Color Singleton Distractors: Evidence from Event-Related Potential Studies. Psychophysiology, 60, e14290.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Drisdelle, B. L., & Eimer, M. (2021). PD Components and Distractor Inhibi-tion in Visual Search: New Evidence for the Signal Suppression Hypothesis. Psychophysiology, 58, e13878.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Feldmann-Wüstefeld, T., Busch, N. A., & Schubö, A. (2020). The Pd Com-ponent Reflects Suppression of Salient Distractors below Baseline. Journal of Vision, 20, 1242-1242.[CrossRef
[10] Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary Covert Orienting Is Contingent on Attentional Control Settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044.[CrossRef
[11] Franconeri, S. L., & Simons, D. J. (2003). Moving and Looming Stimuli Capture Attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 999-1010.[CrossRef
[12] Gaspar, J. M., & McDonald, J. J. (2014). Suppression of Salient Objects Prevents Distraction in Visual Search. Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 5658-5666.[CrossRef
[13] Gaspelin, N., & Luck, S. J. (2018a). Distinguishing among Potential Mechanisms of Singleton Suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44, 626-644.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Gaspelin, N., & Luck, S. J. (2018b). The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22, 79-92.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Gaspelin, N., & Luck, S. J. (2018c). Combined Electrophysiological and Behavioral Evidence for the Suppression of Salient Distractors. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30, 1265-1280.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Gaspelin, N., & Luck, S. J. (2019). Inhibition as a Potential Resolution to the Attentional Capture Debate. Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 12-18.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Gaspelin, N., & Luck, S. J. (2021). Progress and Remaining Issues: A Response to the Commentaries on Luck et al. (2021). Visual Cognition, 29, 650-656.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Gaspelin, N., Leonard, C. J., & Luck, S. J. (2015). Direct Evi-dence for Active Suppression of Salient-but-Irrelevant Sensory Inputs. Psychological Science, 26, 1740-1750.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Gaspelin, N., Leonard, C. J., & Luck, S. J. (2017). Suppression of Overt Attentional Capture by Salient-but-Irrelevant Color Singletons. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79, 45-62.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Gaspelin, N., Ruthruff, E., & Lien, M. C. (2016). The Problem of Latent Attentional Capture: Easy Search Conceals Capture by Task-Irrelevant Abrupt Onsets. Journal of Experimental Psy-chology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 1104-1120.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Goller, F., Schoeberl, T., & Ansorge, U. (2020). Testing the Top-Down Contingent Capture of Attention for Abrupt-Onset Cues: Evi-dence from Cue-Elicited N2pc. Psychophysiology, 57, Article e13655.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Kerzel, D., & Burra, N. (2020). Capture by Context Elements, Not Attentional Suppression of Distractors, Explains the PD with Small Search Displays. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32, 1170-1183.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Kiss, M., Grubert, A., Petersen, A., & Eimer, M. (2012). Attentional Cap-ture by Salient Distractors during Visual Search Is Determined by Temporal Task Demands. Journal of Cognitive Neurosci-ence, 24, 749-759.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Kiss, M., Jolicoeur, P., Dell’acqua, R., & Eimer, M. (2008). Attentional Capture by Visual Singletons Is Mediated by Top-Down Task Set: New Evidence from the N2pc Component. Psychophysi-ology, 45, 1013-1024.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Kumar, S., Soto, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2009). Electro-physiological Evidence for Attentional Guidance by the Contents of Working Memory. European Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 307-317.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Lamy, D. (2021). The Attentional Capture Debate: The Long-Lasting Consequences of a Misnomer. Visual Cognition, 29, 544-547.[CrossRef
[27] Luck, S. J., Gaspelin, N., Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Theeuwes, J. (2021). Progress toward Resolving the Attentional Capture Debate. Visual Cognition, 29, 1-21.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Moher, J., & Egeth, H. E. (2012). The Ignoring Paradox: Cue-ing Distractor Features Leads First to Selection, then to Inhibition of To-Be-Ignored Items. Attention, Perception, & Psycho-physics, 74, 1590-1605.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Ruthruff, E., Faulks, M., Maxwell, J. W., & Gaspelin, N. (2020). Attentional Dwelling and Capture by Color Singletons. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82, 3048-3064.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Ruthruff, E., Kuit, D., Maxwell, J. W., & Gaspelin, N. (2019). Can Capture by Abrupt Onsets Be Suppressed? Visual Cognition, 27, 279-290.[CrossRef
[31] Sawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. (2010). Capture versus Suppression of Attention by Salient Singletons: Electrophysiological Evidence for an Automatic Attend-to-Me Signal. Attention, Percep-tion, & Psychophysics, 72, 1455-1470.[CrossRef
[32] Schönhammer, J. G., & Kerzel, D. (2018). Optimal Task-Sets Override Attentional Capture by Rare Cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44, 681-692.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Stilwell, B. T., & Gaspelin, N. (2021). Attentional Suppression of Highly Salient Color Singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 47, 1313-1328.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Stilwell, B. T., Egeth, H., & Gaspelin, N. (2022). Electrophysiological Evi-dence for the Suppression of Highly Salient Distractors. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 34, 787-805.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and Endogenous Control of Attention: The Effect of Visual Onsets and Offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 83-90.[CrossRef
[36] Theeuwes, J. (2004). Top-Down Search Strategies Cannot Override Atten-tional Capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 65-70.[CrossRef
[37] Theeuwes, J. (2021). Progress toward Resolving the Attentional Capture Debate. Visual Cognition, 29, 637-643.
[38] Theeuwes, J., Atchley, P., & Kramer, A. F. (2000). On the Time Course of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Control of Visual Attention. Con-trol of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII, 105-124.
[39] Wang, B., & Theeuwes, J. (2020). Salience Determines Attentional Orienting in Visual Selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perfor-mance, 46, 1051-1057.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Wang, B., Van Driel, J., Ort, E., & Theeuwes, J. (2019). Anticipatory Distractor Suppression Elicited by Statistical Regularities in Visual Search. Journal of Cognitive Neu-roscience, 31, 1535-1548.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0 a Re-vised Model of Visual Search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.[CrossRef