基于思维品质的人教版初二英语教材活动设计研究
A Study on the Activity Design of PEP English Textbooks for Grade Eight Based on Thinking Qualities
DOI: 10.12677/CES.2023.119408, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 王佳炫:绍兴文理学院外国语学院,浙江 绍兴
关键词: 英语课程标准思维品质文本分析法教材活动设计English Curriculum Standards Thinking Qualities Text Analysis The Activity Design of Textbooks
摘要: 《义务教育英语课程标准(2022)年版》强调对学生思维品质培养的要求。本文通过文本分析法探究人教版八年级教材活动设计如何体现思维品质的培养,讨论各类教材活动对学生思维品质培养时可能存在的问题,而后从使用前、使用中与使用后三方面总结应用策略。研究发现,八年级教材活动设计的思维层次与思维品质均存在着不平衡与不全面的问题,其中高级思维层次的训练偏少与批判性思维品质培养体现不明显。但这两层问题可以在使用层面得以解决,建议教师在使用前设置真实情境,与学生共同合作进行头脑风暴,提供线索,鼓励学生灵活思考与创造性发挥;在使用中把握线索,整理逻辑,完成作品,竞争互助;在使用后,师生批判性思考,积极反馈与深刻总结,升华活动意义。
Abstract: English Curriculum Standards for Compulsory Education (2022 Edition) emphasizes the requirements for cultivating students’ thinking qualities. By means of text analysis, this paper explores how the activity design of PEP textbooks of grade eight reflects the cultivation of thinking qualities. Meanwhile, it discusses several possible problems of these textbook activities on the cultivation of students’ thinking qualities, and then summarizes the strategies from three aspects of application, before, while, and after. The study finds that, in light of the activity design of PEP English textbooks for grade eight, its thinking levels and thinking qualities fail to make a balanced and comprehensive reflection. From these problems, it can be seen that the training of advanced thinking levels is inadequate and the cultivation of critical thinking is not obvious. But the problems are able to be solved from the aspect of application. It is suggested that before using activities on the textbooks, English teachers need to set up real situations, collaborate with students to brainstorm, provide clues, and encourage students to think flexibly and creatively. Besides, while using, competing with and learning from others, students need to grasp clues they have obtained, and organize them logically, which helps them complete work. After using, teachers and students engage in critical thinking, give positive feedback, and summarize themselves deeply, that is able to enhance the significance of activities on the textbooks.
文章引用:王佳炫. 基于思维品质的人教版初二英语教材活动设计研究[J]. 创新教育研究, 2023, 11(9): 2771-2780. https://doi.org/10.12677/CES.2023.119408

参考文献

[1] 邹敏, 陈则航. 基于思维品质培养的初中英语教材使用研究[J]. 天津师范大学学报(基础教育版), 2023, 24(3): 19-24.
[2] 教育部. 义务教育英语课程标准(2022年版) [M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2022: 3, 4, 6, 9, 10, 14, 34, 72.
[3] 惠瑜. 国内外英语教材研究二十年[J]. 教学研究, 2020, 43(4): 38-49.
[4] 张莉, 王晓丽. 中小学教师教材使用的问题与对策[J]. 天津师范大学学报(基础教育版), 2019, 20(4): 8-11.
[5] Barak, M. and Levenberg, A. (2016) A Model of Flexible Thinking in Contemporary Education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 74-85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Hare, W. (1999) The Aims of Education. In: Marples, R., Ed., Critical Thinking as an Aim of Education, Routledge, New York and London, 85-99.
[7] Richards, J.C. and Lockhart, C. (2000) Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classroom. People’s Education Press, Beijing.
[8] Anderson, L.W. and Krathwohl, D.R. (2001) A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete Edition). Longman, New York.
[9] 林崇德. 培养思维品质是发展智能的突破口[J]. 国家教育行政学院学报, 2005(9): 21-26+32.
[10] 张金秀. 英语学科思维品质培养面临的困境与对策[J]. 中小学外语教学(中学篇), 2016, 39(7): 6-11.
[11] 王琼, 秦忠翼. 论思维方法与创造性思维的培养[J]. 湖南社会科学, 2011(6): 29-31.
[12] 陈则航, 王蔷, 钱小芳. 论英语学科核心素养中的思维品质及其发展途径[J]. 课程∙教材∙教法, 2019, 39(1): 91-98.
[13] 杨轶群. 深挖教材文本, 发展思维能力——初中英语阅读教学活动设计实例探究[J]. 英语教师, 2020, 20(7): 100-103.
[14] 张宏祥. 理解•批判•创新: 高中英语思维型阅读的新审视[J]. 天津师范大学学报(基础教育版), 2021, 22(1): 48-50.
[15] 王蔷, 孙薇薇, 蔡铭珂, 汪菁. 指向深度学习的高中英语单元整体教学设计[J]. 外语教育研究前沿, 2021, 4(1): 17-25.
[16] 邹为诚. 英语课程标准研究与教材分析[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2007: 132.
[17] 熊鹏辉. 注重语言交际功能的对话教学活动设计——以PEP小学英语教材对话教学为例[J]. 现代教育科学, 2012(2): 153-155.
[18] 刘倩, 周祁林. 义务教育英语教材编写现状的分析与思考——以人教版英语教材为例[J]. 海外英语, 2022(7): 161-162.
[19] 程军. 我国初中英语教材研究四十年——基于CNKI文献数据的可视化分析[J]. 教育导刊, 2023(2): 59-67.
[20] 杨栋栋. 人教版初中英语教材活动设计使用策略研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林外国语大学, 2020.