不同评分系统对内镜逆行胰胆管造影后胰腺炎预后的预测价值
Predictive Value of Different Scoring Systems on the Prognosis of Pancreatitis after Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreati-tis
摘要: 内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎(PEP)是经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)后最常见的并发症之一，在大多数情况下PEP为轻型，预后较好，但仍存在部分的患者可能出现其他脏器的衰竭或其他局部并发症从而进展为重症急性胰腺炎；因此对病情的早期诊断、严重程度的评估、对不同的患者采取不同的评估方式，从而采取有效的防治措施，这对于预防和治疗ERCP术后胰腺炎都起着关键性的作用，就上述而言本文仅针对不同评分系统在内镜逆行胰胆管造影后胰腺炎预后的预测价值作一综述。
Abstract: Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) is one of the most com-mon complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), in most cases PEP is mild and the prognosis is good, but there are still some patients who may develop failure of other organs or other local complications that progress to severe acute pancreatitis; therefore, the early diagnosis of the disease, the assessment of severity, and different evaluation methods for dif-ferent patients, so as to take effective prevention and treatment measures, which plays a key role in the prevention and treatment of pancreatitis after ERCP surgery, in view of the above, this article only reviews the predictive value of different scoring systems in the prognosis of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatitis.
文章引用：徐耀东, 任利. 不同评分系统对内镜逆行胰胆管造影后胰腺炎预后的预测价值[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(9): 14634-14639. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.1392046

参考文献

[1] Mine, T., Morizane, T., Kawaguchi, Y., et al. (2017) Clinical Practice Guideline for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis. Journal of Gastroenterology, 52, 1013-1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Matsushita, M., Koyabu, M., Nishio, A., Seki, T. and Okazaki, K. (2017) Techniques of ERCP with a Conventional Endoscope in Pancreatoduode-nectomy Anatomy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 86, 747-748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Pekgöz, M. (2019) Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancrea-tography Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review for Prevention and Treatment. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 25, 4019-4042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Cahyadi, O., Tehami, N., de-Madaria, E. and Siau, K. (2022) Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: Prevention, Diagnosis and Management. Medicina, 58, Article No. 1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Shih, H.-Y., Hsu, W.-H. and Kuo, C.-H. (2019) Postendoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 35, 195-201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Morales, S.J., Sampath, K. and Gardner, T.B. (2018) A Review of Pre-vention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis. Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 14, 286-292.
[7] 彭婧, 祝斌. ERCP术后胰腺炎诊治与严重程度评估的研究进展[J]. 海南医学, 2021, 32(9): 1179-1183.
[8] Cotton, P.B., Lehman, G., Vennes, J., et al. (1991) Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Complications and Their Management: An Attempt at Consensus. Gastrointes-tinal Endoscopy, 37, 383-393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Dumonceau, J.M., Andriulli, A., Elmunzer, B.J., et al. (2014) Prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline—Updated June 2014. Endoscopy, 46, 799-815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Chandrasekhara, V., Khashab, M.A., Muthusamy, V.R., et al. (2017) Adverse Events Associated with ERCP. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 85, 32-47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 郭学刚, 罗辉, 郑亮. ERCP术后胰腺炎的预防策略[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(8): 853-860.
[12] Andrade-Dávila, V.F., Chávez-Tostado, M., Dávalos-Cobián, C., et al. (2015) Rectal Indomethacin Versus Placebo to Reduce the Incidence of Pancreatitis after Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopan-creatography: Results of a Controlled Clinical Trial. BMC Gastroenterology, 15, Article No. 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Dubravcsik, Z., Hritz, I., Keczer, B., et al. (2021) Network Me-ta-Analysis of Prophylactic Pancreatic Stents and Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in the Prevention of Moder-ate-to-Severe Post-ERCP Pancreatitis. Pancreatology, 21, 704-713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Kim, E.J., Cho, J.H., Oh, K.Y., et al. (2017) The Risk Factors for Moderately Severe and Severe Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis According to the Re-vised Atlanta Classification. Pancreas, 46, 1208-1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] Min, A., Li, H., Xiang, H., et al. (2019) Comparison of Three Classification Systems for Acute Pancreatitis. Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine, 625-629.
[16] Banks, P.A., Bollen, T.L., Dervenis, C., et al. (2013) Classification of Acute Pancreatitis—2012: Revision of the Atlanta Classification and Definitions by International Consensus. Gut, 62, 102-111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Smeets, X., Bouhouch, N., Buxbaum, J., et al. (2019) The Re-vised Atlanta Criteria More Accurately Reflect Severity of Post-Ercp Pancreatitis Compared to the Consensus Criteria. United European Gastroenterology Journal, 7, 557-564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Wu, B.U., Johannes, R.S., Sun, X., et al. (2008) The Early Pre-diction of Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis: A Large Population-Based Study. Gut, 57, 1698-1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] 唐豪佑, 刘胜, 胡程俊, 等. 改良客观性BISAP评分对急性胰腺炎严重程度及预后的预测价值[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2021, 37(6): 1386-1391.
[20] Yang, C.J., Chen, J., Phillips, A.R., Windsor, J.A. and Petrov, M.S. (2014) Predictors of Severe and Critical Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review. Digestive and Liver Disease, 46, 446-451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Gao, W., Yang, H.-X. and Ma, C.-E. (2015) The Value of BISAP Score for Predicting Mortality and Severity in Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLOS ONE, 10, e0130412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Yang, Y.-X. and Li, L. (2016) Evaluating the Ability of the Bedside Index for Severity of Acute Pancreatitis Score to Predict Severe Acute Pancreatitis: A Meta-Analysis. Medical Principles and Practice, 25, 137-142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Valverde-López, F., Wilcox, C.M. and Redondo-Cerezo, E. (2018) Evalu-ation and Management of Acute Pancreatitis in Spain. Gastroenterologia y Hepatologia, 41, 618-628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Zanwar, S., Mohan, A.T., Paramsivan, P., et al. (2021) A Novel “BISSHOAP” Score for Predicting Severe and Moderately Severe Acute Pancreatitis in Emergency Room. Gas-troenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy Practice, 1, 111-115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[25] Ranson, J.H., Rifkind, K.M., Roses, D.F, et al. (1974) Objective Early Identification of Severe Acute Pancreatitis. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 61, 443-451.
[26] 杨涓, 郑盛, 张帆, 刘占举. 不同评分系统早期预测急性胰腺炎病情严重程度的比较研究[J]. 中国医药导报, 2016, 13(2): 133-137+141.
[27] He, W., Zheng, X., Zhu, Y., et al. (2019) Comparison of APACHE II, Ranson, BISAP and CTSI Scores in Early Prediction of the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis Based on Large Sample Database. Chinese Journal of Pancreatology, 19, 172-176.
[28] 张杨, 杨琰, 曹钧. Ranson评分与Glasgow评分对急性胰腺炎严重程度及预后评估的对比分析[J]. 腹部外科, 2016, 29(6): 431-434.
[29] 陈辉, 兰涛, 张培君, 等. BISAP、Ranson和APACHE II评分系统对高脂血症性急性胰腺炎患者病情和预后的评估价值 [J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2020, 20(2): 361-365+396.
[30] Mikó, A., Vigh, É., Mátrai, P., et al. (2019) Computed Tomography Severity Index vs. Other Indi-ces in the Prediction of Severity and Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis: A Predictive Accuracy Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Physiology, 10, Article 1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Ong, Y. and Shelat, V.G. (2021) Ranson Score to Stratify Severity in Acute Pancreatitis Remains Valid—Old Is Gold. Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 15, 865-877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] 罗秀平, 王洁, 吴青, 等. 急性胰腺炎评分系统的研究进展[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2022, 38(9): 2188-2192.
[33] Knaus, W.A., Draper, E.A., Wagner, D.P. and Zimmerman, J.E. (1985) APACHE II: A Severity Of Disease Classification System. Critical Care Medicine, 13, 818-829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[34] Akavipat, P., Thinkhamrop, J., Thinkhamrop, B. and Sriraj, W. (2019) Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II Score—The Clinical Predictor in Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit. Acta Clinica Croatica, 58, 50-56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] 王露, 黄兰, 邵颖颖, 等. 急性生理功能和慢性健康状况评分系统II及严重程度床边指数评分对急性胰腺炎病情变化的预测价值研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2011, 14(32): 3693-3695.
[36] 吴县斌, 苏东星, 潘志刚, 等. BISAP、APACHE II、Ranson评分在预测急性胰腺炎预后中价值对比分析[J]. 现代消化及介入治疗, 2016, 21(2): 294-296.
[37] Adam, F., Bor, C., Uyar, M., Demirağ, K. and Çankayali, İ (2013) Severe Acute Pancreatitis Admitted to Intensive Care Unit: SOFA Is Superior to Ranson’s Criteria and APACHE II in Determining Prognosis. The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, 24, 430-435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Alberti, P., Pando, E., Mata, R., et al. (2021) Evaluation of the Modified Computed Tomography Severity Index (MCTSI) and Computed Tomography Severity Index (CTSI) In Predicting Se-verity and Clinical Outcomes in Acute Pancreatitis. Journal of Digestive Diseases, 22, 41-48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Bao, Y. and Ge, W. (2022) Correlation between Serum Levels of PTX-3, SIL-2R, Inflammatory Markers, and APACHE II Scores in Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis. Medicine, 101, e31252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐