基于不礼貌理论的夫妻冲突话语研究——以《再见爱人》为例
Analysis of Conflict Talk between Couples from the Perspective of Impoliteness Theory—A Case Study on See You Again
摘要: 礼貌原则作为语用学的重要议题之一,提出较早,一直受到众多学者的关注。相对来说,不礼貌现象研究起步较晚,但近年来受到学者愈来愈多的关注。冲突话语是日常生活交往中普遍的语言现象,学者们基于不同视角研究夫妻冲突话语、亲子冲突话语等不同冲突话语。本文结合不礼貌与冲突话语,从不礼貌角度出发,以Bousfield 2008年提出的不礼貌理论为依据,研究了国内真人秀节目《再见爱人》中的夫妻冲突话语。研究发现,夫妻冲突话语中共使用了13类不礼貌策略和3种不礼貌回应模式,不同夫妻使用不礼貌策略的特点不同,这与夫妻相处模式和夫妻双方性格息息相关。本研究帮助人们更好的理解夫妻间的冲突话语,有助于人们在人际交往中塑造和谐的人际关系。
Abstract: As one of the indispensable topics in pragmatics, Politeness principle has always attracted researchers’ high attention. Relatively, impoliteness study is proposed later, but it attracts more and more scholars’ stress in recent years. Conflict talk is prevailing and ubiquitous phenomenon in our daily life. From different perspectives, scholars conduct studies on different conflict talks, such as conflict talks between couples and parent-child conflict talks. From the perspective of impoliteness, this paper probes into conflict talks between couples in the reality television show See You Again. The study finds that 13 impoliteness strategies and 3 response patterns have applied to linguistic data in this thesis. The use of impoliteness strategies by different couples presents different characteristics, which is closely related to the marital relationship pattern and the personality of couples. This paper conduces to a better understanding of conflict talks between couples and helps people to shape harmonious interpersonal relationships in interpersonal communication.
文章引用:朱秀丽. 基于不礼貌理论的夫妻冲突话语研究——以《再见爱人》为例[J]. 现代语言学, 2023, 11(9): 3899-3906. https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2023.119523

参考文献

[1] 冉永平. 冲突性话语的语用学研究概述[J]. 外语教学, 2010, 31(1): 1-6.
[2] 刘峰. 不礼貌理论视角下的夫妻冲突话语研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 青岛: 青岛大学, 2016.
[3] 汤春梦, 薛枝. 亲子间冲突话语引发方式研究[J]. 吕梁学院学报, 2022, 12(3): 21-24.
[4] 余莎. 不礼貌原则下的婆媳冲突话语研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2017.
[5] 刘蔚, 薛枝. 不礼貌视角下闺蜜冲突话语的语言策略研究[J]. 宁夏大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2022, 44(1): 120-126..
[6] 卓晓孟. 课堂场域内师生话语冲突及其调适——基于A.L.科塞功能冲突理论[J]. 当代教育科学, 2018(5): 42-46.
[7] 龚双萍. 冲突性军事外交话语中合法化的语用研究[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2020, 43(6): 26-33.
[8] 耿雯雯, 谢朝群. 网络语言暴力的(不)礼貌研究[J]. 中国外语, 2020, 17(3): 20-28.
[9] 赖小玉. 汉语语境下夫妻间冲突性话语的顺应性研究[J]. 外语学刊, 2011(4): 59-63.
[10] 何暄, 丁青兰. 夫妻冲突话语毗邻结构探析[J]. 南昌高专学报, 2011, 26(4): 41-42+44.
[11] 许淑瑶. 违反合作原则的夫妻冲突话语的语言策略描述——以《绝望主妇》为语料[J]. 集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 22(1): 123-129.
[12] 马巧艳. 夫妻冲突性话语中的身份建构研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆师范大学, 2021.
[13] Bousfield, D. (2008) Impoliteness in Interaction. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Goffman, E. (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Interaction. Doubleday and Company, New York.
[15] Brown, P. and Levinson, S.C. (1978) Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena In: Goody, E.N., Ed., Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 56-311.
[16] Leech, G. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. Longman, London.
[17] Culpeper, J. (1996) Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 349-367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef