社会阶层对亲环境意愿的影响——环境关注与环境问题感知的链式中介作用
The Effect of Social Class on Pro-Environmental Willingness—Serial Mediating Role of Environmental Concerns and Perceived Environmental Problems
摘要: 为探讨个体社会阶层对其亲环境意愿的影响及其心理机制,本研究基于中国综合社会调查发布的大样本数据,抽取相应指标,通过两个研究对该问题进行考察。结果表明:① 个体的主观社会阶层对其亲环境意愿具有正向预测作用;② 个体的主观社会阶层越高越关注环境问题,且感知到环境问题的严重性越高;③ 个体对环境的关注度越高,其对感知环境问题的严重性越高;④ 个体对环境越关注,感知到的问题越严重,其亲环境意愿越高;⑤ 主观社会阶层分别通过环境关注、环境问题感知两条路径间接影响个体亲环境意愿;⑥ 主观社会阶层通过环境关注度→环境问题感知对亲环境意愿产生间接影响。该结果对提高个体环保意识,进而改善生态环境具有启示意义。
Abstract: In order to explore the influence of an individual’s social class on his/her pro-environmental in-tention and its psychological mechanism, this study examines this issue through two studies based on the large-sample data released by the China General Social Survey (CGSS), with corresponding indicators extracted. The results show that: ① An individual’s subjective social class has a positive predictive effect on his/her pro-environmental willingness; ② the higher an individual’s subjective social class is, the more concerned he/she is about environmental problems, and the higher the perceived severity of environmental problems; ③ the higher an individual’s concern for the environment, the higher his/her perception of the severity of environmental problems; ④ the higher an individual’s concern for the environment and the more severe the perceived problem is, the higher his/her pro-environmental willingness is; ⑤ the subjective social class indirectly affects individual pro-environmental willingness through the two paths of environmental concern and perceived environmental problems, respectively; ⑥ subjective social class indirectly affects pro-environmental willingness through environmental concern → perceived environmental problems. The results are suggestive for improving individuals’ environmental awareness and thus improving the ecological environment.
文章引用:张颖. 社会阶层对亲环境意愿的影响——环境关注与环境问题感知的链式中介作用[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2023, 12(9): 5235-5241. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2023.129716

参考文献

[1] Fritsche, I. and Masson, T. (2021) Collective Climate Action: When Do People Turn into Collective Environmental Agents? Current Opinion in Psychology, 42, 114-119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] 胡奕欣, 李寿涛, 陈瑞蕊, 等. 近20年来亲环境行为研究进展[J]. 心理研究, 2021, 14(5): 428-438.
[3] 白洁, 杨沈龙, 徐步霄, 等. 达者何以兼济天下: 高阶层再分配偏向的心理机制及谦卑的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(10): 1161-1172.
[4] 许云鹏, 王晓明, 王亚如, 等. 主观社会阶层对亲环境行为的影响: 物质主义价值观的中介作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2021, 9(4): 219-228.
[5] 皮磊. 《2023中国高净值人士慈善调研报告》发布, 超八成高净值人士踊跃参与慈善[EB/OL]. http://www.gongyishibao.com/html/yanjiubaogao/2023/03/23470.html, 2023-03-31.
[6] Eom, K., Kim, H.S. and Sherman, D.K. (2018) Social Class, Control, and Action: Socioeconomic Status Differences in Antecedents of Support for Pro-Environmental Action. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 77, 60-75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Pearson, A.R., Ballew, M.T., Naiman, S. and Schuldt, J.P. (2017) Race, Class, Gender and Climate Change Communication. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 王建华, 王缘. 环境风险感知对民众公领域亲环境行为的影响机制研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022(6): 68-80.
[9] 施利民. 公众环境风险感知对亲环境行为的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 四川大学, 2021.
[10] Tan, J.J. and Kraus, M.W. (2015) Lay Theories about Social Class Buffer Lower-Class Individuals against Poor Self-Rated Health and Negative Affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 446-461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Yan, L., Keh, H.T. and Chen, J. (2021) Assimilating and Differentiating: The Curvilinear Effect of Social Class on Green Consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 47, 914-936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 汪新建, 史梦薇. 中国人压力应对研究: 基于主位与客位的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(7): 1239-1247.
[13] 李馨, 刘培, 肖晨洁, 等. 组织中权力如何促进亲社会行为? 责任感知的中介作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(9): 1586-1598.
[14] 廖化化, 黄蕾, 胡斌. 资源保存理论在组织行为学中的应用: 演变与挑战[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(2): 449-463.
[15] Vieites, Y., Goldszmidt, R. and Andrade, E.B. (2022) Social Class Shapes Donation Allocation Preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 48, 775-795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef