国际贸易中的跨境数据流动自由和监管自主权问题研究
Cross-Border Data Flow Freedom and Regulatory Autonomy in International Trade
DOI: 10.12677/DS.2023.95342, PDF,   
作者: 黄博轩:华东政法大学国际法学院,上海
关键词: 数字贸易跨境数据流动监管权协调 Digital Trade Cross-Border Data Flow Regulatory Coordination
摘要: 科技的发展和国际形势的变化促使着国际贸易的形式不断突破传统。近年来互联网公司的出现,让基于跨境数据流动的国际贸易形式越来越常见,然而每个国家对跨境数据的流动都有不同的监管政策,不同国家间的监管政策冲突给跨国企业以及国际贸易带来了巨大的挑战和困扰。为了不影响国际贸易的发展,在现有贸易协定框架下协调不同的监管政策已成为了国际组织和各个国家所面临的重要问题。本文将试图分析各国跨境数据流动的相关法律和多边贸易条约及区域贸易协定下的义务框架,提出协调监管自主权和跨境数据流动自由的路径,最后对我国在国际贸易中的跨境数据流动监管和国际合作存在的缺憾提出建议。
Abstract: The development of technology and the changes in the international situation have prompted the forms of international trade to constantly break through tradition. In recent years, the emergence of internet companies has made the form of international trade based on cross-border data flow more and more common. However, each country has different regulatory policies on cross-border data flow, and the conflicts of regulatory policies among different countries have brought huge challenges and troubles to multinational enterprises and international trade. In order not to affect the development of international trade, it has become an important issue for international organizations and countries to coordinate different regulatory policies under the existing trade agreement framework. This article will try to analyze the relevant laws of cross-border data flow in various countries and the obligation framework under multilateral trade treaties and regional trade treaties, propose a path to coordinate the regulatory autonomy and the freedom of cross-border data flow, and finally put forward suggestions on the shortcomings of China’s cross-border data flow regulation and international cooperation in international trade.
文章引用:黄博轩. 国际贸易中的跨境数据流动自由和监管自主权问题研究[J]. 争议解决, 2023, 9(5): 2503-2509. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2023.95342

参考文献

[1] The Work Programme on Electronic Commerce: What Is E-Commerce?
https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/ecom_e/ecom_work_programme_e.htm
[2] 戴艺晗. 贸易数字化与监管碎片化:国际贸易制度框架下跨境数据流动治理的挑战与应对[J]. 国际经济法学刊, 2021(1): 1-13.
[3] OECD (2013) The App Economy. OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 230, OECD Publishing, Paris.
[4] 许多奇. 个人数据跨境流动规制的国际格局及中国应对[J]. 法学论坛, 2018, 33(3): 130-137.
[5] 叶开儒. 数据跨境流动规制中的“长臂管辖”——对欧盟GDPR的原旨主义考察[J]. 法学评论, 2020, 38(1): 106-117.
[6] 白一芳. 欧盟法院宣布欧美数据传输“隐私盾”无效: 详细始末如何? 未来何去何从? [EB/OL].
https://www.ilawpress.com/material/detail?id=519294540025168384&t=material, 2023-06-20.
[7] 韩静雅. 跨境数据流动国际规制的焦点问题分析[J]. 河北法学, 2016, 34(10): 170-178.
[8] 时业伟. 跨境数据流动中的国际贸易规则: 规制、兼容与发展[J]. 比较法研究, 2020(4): 173-184.
[9] Sen, N. (2018) Understanding the Role of the WTO in International Data Flows: Taking the Liberalization or the Regulatory Autonomy Path. Journal of International Economic Law, 21, 323-348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 陈卫东, 石静霞. WTO体制下文化政策措施的困境与出路——基于“中美出版物和视听产品案”的思考[J]. 法商研究, 2010, 27(4): 52-62.
[11] 石静霞. 数字经济背景下的WTO电子商务诸边谈判: 最新发展及焦点问题[J]. 东方法学, 2020(2): 170-184.
[12] 彭德雷, 张子琳. RCEP核心数字贸易规则及其影响[J]. 中国流通经济, 2021, 35(8): 18-29.
[13] 徐金海, 周蓉蓉. 数字贸易规则制定: 发展趋势、国际经验与政策建议[J]. 国际贸易, 2019(6): 61-68.