资产分割理论背景下成员在破产清算中的责任承担方式
Members’ Liability Bearing Method in Bankruptcy Liquidation under the Background of Assets Division Theory
摘要: 当涉及资产分割理论及其与企业清算的交织,我们不仅仅揭开公司运作机制的面纱,更进一步深入理解其内在运作。本文从资产分割理论角度,剖析成员责任承担方式,特别关注在企业清算过程中的应用。资产分割理论的研究揭示了公司内部不同成员在责任分担上的不同角色,从高层管理者到普通股东,都肩负着不同风险与责任。此理论为企业清算提供了理论基础,其内涵拓展至清算场景。在资产分割理论的指引下,企业清算成为一个责任和利益重新分配的过程。资产分割理论提供了深刻的理论视角,有助于我们全面理解企业清算。透过不同成员的责任与权益,以及在清算中的角色,我们能更加准确地解决清算过程中的复杂问题,确保责任和利益在重新分配中得以公正合理体现。
Abstract:
Turning to the theory of asset division and its intertwining with corporate liquidation, we not only reveal the mechanics of corporate operation, but also further deepen our understanding of its inner workings. This paper analyses the way in which member liability is assumed from the perspective of asset division theory, with a particular focus on its application to the process of corporate liquidation. The study of asset division theory reveals the different roles of different members within the firm in sharing responsibilities, from top management to ordinary shareholders, who all bear different risks and responsibilities. This theory provides a theoretical basis for corporate liquidation, and its connotation is extended to liquidation scenarios. Under the guidance of the asset division theory, corporate liquidation becomes a process of redistribution of responsibilities and benefits. The asset division theory provides a profound theoretical perspective that helps us to fully understand corporate liquidation. By considering the responsibilities and interests of different members and their roles in liquidation, we can more accurately solve the complex problems in the liquidation process and ensure that the responsibilities and interests are justly and reasonably reflected in the redistribution.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
赵廉慧. 有限责任的性质与功能[J]. 广东社会科学, 2021(6): 216-228.
|
|
[2]
|
Morley, J. (2016) The Common Law Corporation: The Power of the Trust in Anglo-American Business History. Columbia Law Review, 116, 2168-2174.
|
|
[3]
|
曾思. 资产分割理论下的企业财产独立性 经济功能与法律限制[J]. 中外法学, 2019, 31(5): 1357-1376.
|
|
[4]
|
林斯韦. 股权转让如何准用买卖合同规范?——跨越契约法与组织法的解释[J]. 兰州学刊, 2020(12): 46-67.
|
|
[5]
|
葛伟军. 刺破公司面纱规则的变迁与展望[J]. 法治研究, 2022(5): 101-113.
|
|
[6]
|
Thompson, R.B. (1991) Piercing the Corporate Veil: An Empirical Study. Cornell Law Review, 76, 1063-1069.
|
|
[7]
|
刘俊海. 揭开公司面纱制度应用于司法实践的若干问题研究[J]. 法律适用, 2011(8): 16-22.
|
|
[8]
|
蔡卓瞳. 资产分割理论下关联企业实质合并破产的判断标准[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东政法大学, 2020.
|
|
[9]
|
王军. 公司偿债能力判断规则及其构建[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 36(4): 33-45.
|
|
[10]
|
肖彬. 实质合并破产规则比较研究与完善[D]: [博士学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学, 2021.
|
|
[11]
|
江朵. 关联企业破产时的实质合并原则研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2007.
|