脓毒症心肌损伤生物标志物最新进展
Recent Advances in Biomarkers of Myocardial Damage in Sepsis
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2023.1392114, PDF,   
作者: 阿卜力提普·阿卜杜瓦柯, 刘 艳*:新疆医科大学研究生院,新疆 乌鲁木齐
关键词: 脓毒血症心肌损伤生物标志物Sepsis Myocardial Damage Biomarkers
摘要: 近几年在危重症病人当中因脓毒症的发病率和死亡率逐渐上升对其早期诊断和治疗被引起越来越多的关注,早期识别感染对脓毒症心肌损伤患者的临床病程和结局至关重要。脓毒症的理想标志物应出现在病程早期,可快速、轻松地测量,具有预后意义,足够敏感,可以检测宿主反应最小的患者的感染,并且具有足够的特异性,可以区分感染与其他非感染性疾病,但既往根据患者临床表现、心脏超声心动图和部分传统标志物,对脓毒症患者心肌损伤的评估中没有呈现很好的特异度。为了能更好的早期诊断及评估病情,近期陆续出现了一些同样可能与脓毒症心肌损伤相关的新型标志物。本文主要讲述心肌损伤相关的传统与新型生物标志物优缺点与适用范围,以及生物标志物相互联合作用下对心功能状态的评估价值。
Abstract: In recent years, due to the increasing incidence and mortality of sepsis in critically ill patients, more and more attention has been paid to its early diagnosis and treatment. Early identification of infec-tion is crucial to the clinical course and outcome of patients with myocardial damage caused by sep-sis. The ideal marker for sepsis should appear early in the course of the disease, be quickly and eas-ily measured, have prognostic significance, be sensitive enough to detect infection in patients with minimal host response, and be specific enough to distinguish infection from other non- infectious diseases. There is no good specificity in the assessment of myocardial damage in patients with sep-sis. In order to have better early diagnosis and evaluation of the disease, some new markers that may also be associated with myocardial damage in sepsis have recently emerged. On the basis of traditional markers of myocardial injury, this paper mainly reviews the advantages and disad-vantages of new markers that have attracted recent attention and their application scope, and the evaluation value of recently widely cited biomarkers on cardiac function status under the interac-tion of mutual interaction.
文章引用:阿卜力提普·阿卜杜瓦柯, 刘艳. 脓毒症心肌损伤生物标志物最新进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(9): 15122-15127. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.1392114

参考文献

[1] Singer, M., Deutschman, C.S., Seymour, C.W., Shankar-Har, M., Annane, D. and Bauer, M. (2016) The Third Interna-tional Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA, 315, 801-810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Sato, R. and Nasu, M. (2015) A Review of Sepsis-Induced Cardio-myopathy. Journal of Intensive Care, 3, Article No. 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Lin, H., Wang, W., Lee, M., Meng, Q. and Ren, H. (2020) Current Status of Septic Cardiomyopathy: Basic Science and Clinical Progress. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 11, Article No. 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 苏梅, 陈涛, 秦引林, 马瑞. 诺新康注射液对脓毒血症大鼠心肌损伤的保护作用[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2015, 20(12): 1328-1334.
[5] Liu, Z., Cui, L., Wang, Y. and Guo, Y. (2006) Cardiac Troponin I and Ventricular Arrhythmia in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure. European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 36, 466-472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Samad, M. and Malempati, S. (2023) Natriuretic Peptides as Biomarkers: Narrative Review and Considerations in Cardiovascular and Respiratory Dysfunctions. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 96, 137-149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Yaluri, N., Stančáková Yaluri, A., Žeňuch, P., Žeňuchová, Z., Tóth, Š. and Kalanin, P. (2023) Cardiac Biomarkers and Their Role in Identifying Increased Risk of Cardiovascular Complications in COVID-19 Patients. Diagnostics (Basel), 13, Article No. 2508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Vallabhajosyula, S., Wang, Z., Murad, M.H., Vallabhajosyula, S., Sundaragiri, P.R. and Kashani, K. (2020) Natriuretic Peptides to Predict Short-Term Mortality in Patients with Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes, 4, 50-64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 陈宇, 张西京. 早期诊断脓毒症心肌病的心肌标志物[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志(网络版), 2020, 6(2): 146-150.
[10] Ion, A., Stafie, C., Mitu, O., Ciobanu, C.E., Halitchi, D.I. and Costache, A.D. (2021) Biomarkers Utility: At the Borderline between Cardiology and Neurology. Journal of Cardi-ovascular Development and Disease, 8, Article No. 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 李娟珍, 王莹. 脓毒症心肌抑制的临床诊断[J]. 中国小儿急救医学, 2016, 23(8): 556-560.
[12] Boncler, M., Wu, Y. and Watala, C. (2019) The Multiple Faces of C-Reactive Pro-tein-Physiological and Pathophysiological Implications in Cardiovascular Disease. Molecules, 24, Article No. 2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Nuntnarumit, P., Pinkaew, O. and Kitiwanwanich, S. (2002) Pre-dictive Values of Serial C-Reactive Protein in Neonatal Sepsis. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 85, S1151-S1158.
[14] Ridker, P. (2003) Clinical Application of C-Reactive Protein for Cardiovascular Disease Detection and Prevention. Circulation, 107, 363-369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Balk, R. (2014) Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS): Where Did It Come from and Is It Still Relevant Today? Virulence, 5, 20-26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Afari, M. and Bhat, T. (2016) Neutrophil to Lympho-cyte Ratio (NLR) and Cardiovascular Diseases: An Update. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy, 14, 573-577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Bartel, D.J. (2009) MicroRNAs: Target Recognition and Regulatory Functions. Cell, 136, 215-233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Zhang, Z.C., Dai, H.W., Yu, Y.H., Yang, J.D. and Hu, C.B. (2012) Usefulness of Heart-Type Fatty Acid-Binding Protein in Patients with Severe Sepsis. Journal of Critical Care, 27, 415e13-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Azzazy, H.M., Pelsers, M.M. and Christenson, R.H. (2006) Unbound Free Fatty Acids and Heart-Type Fatty Acid-Binding Protein: Diagnostic Assays and Clinical Applica-tions. Clinical Chemistry, 52, 19-29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] 王婵, 董道然, 荆程桥, 张倩楠, 史晓娟, 宗媛. 心型脂肪酸结合蛋白对脓毒性心肌病的早期诊断价值[J]. 中国急救医学, 2023, 43(3): 169-174.
[21] Deng, C., Zhao, L., Yang, Z., Shang, J.J., Wang, C.Y. and Shen, M.Z. (2022) Targeting HMGB1 for the Treatment of Sepsis and Sep-sis-Induced Organ Injury. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, 43, 520-528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Yang, K., Cao, F., Wang, W., Tian, Z. and Yang, L. (2023) The Relationship between HMGB1 and Autophagy in the Pathogenesis of Diabetes and Its Complications. Frontiers in En-docrinology (Lausanne), 14, Article ID: 1141516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] 颜培夏, 王媛媛. HMGB1、cTnI、CK-MB及NT-proBNP对脓毒症心肌损伤的诊断价值[J]. 重庆医学, 2023, 52(5): 737-741.
[24] Schenk, M., Bouchon, A., Seibold, F. and Mueller, C. (2007) TREM-1—Expressing Intestinal Macrophages Crucially Amplify Chronic Inflammation in Experi-mental Colitis and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 117, 3097-3106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Wu, Y., Wang, F., Fan, X., Bao, R., Bo, L. and Li, J. (2012) Accuracy of Plasma sTREM-1 for Sepsis Diagnosis in Systemic Inflammatory Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Critical Care, 16, R229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Chang, W., Peng, F., Meng, S., Xu, J. and Yang, Y. (2020) Diagnostic Value of Serum Soluble Triggering Expressed Receptor on Myeloid Cells 1 (sTREM-1) in Suspected Sepsis: A Meta-Analysis. BMC Immunology, 21, Article No. 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Dilireba, T., Yang, C., Wang, Y., Ding, Q. and Yu, X. (2022) Research Advance of the Mechanism and Treatment of Septic Cardiomyopathy. Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medi-cine, 34, 1112-1115.
[28] 王超, 姜阳, 杨欣. 超声心动图联合Tei指数对脓毒症预后评估价值及对心肌损伤的诊断价值研究[J]. 中国医学创新, 2023, 20(6): 116-120.
[29] 陈文冲, 李德平, 罗建立, 周亚锋, 郑明江, 黎洁芳. 心肌损伤标志物和序贯器官衰竭评估评分评估感染性休克患者预后的价值分析[J]. 广西医学, 2021, 43(2): 167-169, 196.