沾化凹陷沙四上亚段湖相碳酸盐岩储层岩石物理特征与模型
Petrophysical Characteristics and Model of Lacustrine Carbonate Reservoir in the Upper Fourth Member of Shahejie Formation in the Zhanhua Sag
DOI: 10.12677/AG.2023.139106, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 苏朝光, 巴素玉, 刘升余, 宋晓倩:中国石化胜利油田分公司物探研究院,山东 东营;金杰华*:中国石化胜利油田分公司物探研究院,山东 东营;胜利石油管理局博士后科研工作站,山东 东营;杨 田, 何 青:成都理工大学沉积地质研究院,四川 成都
关键词: 岩性参数岩石物理模型参数敏感性湖相碳酸盐岩沙四上亚段沾化凹陷Petrophysical Parameters Petrophysical Model Parameter Sensitivity Lacustrine Carbonate Upper Fourth Member of the Shahejie Formation Zhanhua Sag
摘要: 沾化凹陷是渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷重要的油气勘探区,其中沙四上亚段湖相碳酸盐岩油藏是凹陷内关键的勘探目标。为进一步认识湖相碳酸盐岩储层岩性、沉积微相与岩石物理参数之间的关系,本文以沾化凹陷沙四上亚段湖相碳酸盐岩储层为目标,综合利用岩石学、物性表征、岩石物理测试等多种分析测试资料,系统表征湖相碳酸盐岩储层的岩石学特征、沉积微相、岩石物理参数及参数敏感性特征,并开展储层岩石物理建模。结果表明:沾化凹陷沙四上亚段湖相碳酸盐岩以灰岩为主,次为混积岩,白云岩发育较少。主要发育灰礁、灰滩、灰泥亚相,包括礁核、礁前、礁间水道、礁后、礁缘、滩核、滩缘、滩间水道微相。在样品干燥和饱水情况下,滩核微相纵波速度、横波速度、体积模量、剪切模量、杨氏模量、泊松比中相较于滩缘微相较高;生物灰岩纵、横波速度、体积模量较高,砂屑灰岩纵、横波速度、体积模量变化范围较大,灰质白云岩、砂屑灰岩、砂质灰岩及泥晶灰岩的泊松比偏低。密度、纵横波速度比和λ常数交汇,作为岩性敏感性参数反映流体对储层岩性无影响;纵、横波速度比值与λ常数在不同流体情况下对区分沉积微相的敏感性特征不同。碳酸盐岩储层整体符合Gassmann岩石物理模型预测,但局部符合DEM岩石物理模型预测;DEM岩石物理模型作为微裂缝发育的非均质储层的岩石物理模型较Gassmann模型预测结果更准确。
Abstract: The Zhanhua Sag is a significant oil and gas exploration area in Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin. Lacustrine carbonate reservoirs of the upper fourth member of Shahejie Formation are the key exploration target in this sag. To further reveal the relationship between lithology, sedimentary microfacies and petrophysical parameters of lacustrine carbonate reservoir, in this paper, the upper fourth member of Shahejie Formation in Zhanhua Sag was taken as the target. The petrological characteristics, sedimentary microfsacies, petrophysical parameters and parameter sensitivity characteristics of lacustrine carbonate reservoirs are systematically characterized by comprehensive use of petrological, physical characterization and petrophysical testing data, and reservoir petrophysical modeling is carried out. The results show that the lacustrine carbonate rocks in the upper fourth member of Shahejie Formation in the Zhanhua Sag are mainly limestone, the secondary is mixed rock, and the dolomite is less developed. It mainly develops lime-reef, lime-beach and lime-mud, including microfacies of reef core, reef front, channel among reefs, reef back, reef margin, beach core, beach margin and channel among beaches. In the case of dry and saturated samples, the velocity of P-wave, S-wave, bulk modulus, shear modulus, Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio of the beach core microfacies are higher than those of the beach margin microfacies. The velocity of P-wave, S-wave and volume modulus of biogenic limestone is higher, the velocity of P-wave, S-wave and volume modulus of calcarenite is larger, and the Poisson’s ratio of limy dolomite, calcarenite, sandy limestone and micrite is lower. The intersection of the density, the ratio of P-wave velocity to S-wavevelocity and λ shows that fluid has no influence on the reservoir lithology. The ratio of P-wave velocity to S-wave velocity and shear waves and λ has different sensitivity characteristics to distinguish sedimentary microfacies under different fluid conditions. The carbonate reservoir is predicted by Gassmann petrophysical model as a whole, but locally by DEM petrophysical model. The DEM petrophysical model is more accurate than the Gassmann model as a petrophysical model of heterogeneous reservoir with micro-fracture development.
文章引用:苏朝光, 金杰华, 巴素玉, 刘升余, 杨田, 宋晓倩, 何青. 沾化凹陷沙四上亚段湖相碳酸盐岩储层岩石物理特征与模型[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2023, 13(9): 1114-1126. https://doi.org/10.12677/AG.2023.139106

参考文献

[1] Williamson, C.R. and Picard, M.D. (1974) Petrology of Carbonate Rocks of the Green River Formation (Eocene). Journal of Sedimentary Research, 44, 738-759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 初广震, 张矿明, 柳佳期. 湖相碳酸盐岩油气资源分析与勘探前景[J]. 资源与产业, 2010, 12(2): 99-102.
[3] Eardley, A.J. (1938) Sediments of Great Salt Lake, Utah. AAPG Bulletin, 22, 1305-1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Herlinger Jr., R., Zambonato, E.E. and De Ros, L.F. (2017) Influence of Diagenesis on the Quality of Lower Cretaceous Pre-Salt Lacustrine Carbonate Reservoirs from Northern Campos Basin, Offshore Brazil. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 87, 1285-1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 刘震, 张军华, 王静, 等. 湖相碳酸盐岩研究进展及展望[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2022, 57(2): 487-497+250.
[6] 杜江民, 龙鹏宇, 杨鹏, 等. 中国陆相湖盆碳酸盐岩储集层特征及其成藏条件[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(1): 52-69.
[7] 师涛, 苏朝光, 张营革, 等. 碳酸盐岩沉积相带分析及地震预测——以邵家地区沙四段为例[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2012, 5(4): 23-26.
[8] 黄铮. 邵家地区沙四上亚段碳酸盐岩储层发育特征[J]. 石化技术, 2018, 25(3): 124+99.
[9] 夏伟. 邵家洼陷沙四段湖相白云岩成因及其储层发育规律研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2017.
[10] 杜彦男, 吴孔友, 徐天野, 等. 沾化、车镇凹陷构造样式差异特征对比[J]. 甘肃科学学报, 2021, 33(5): 35-46.
[11] Peng, C. (2011) Distribution of Favorable Lacustrine Carbonate Reservoirs: A Case from the Upper Es4 of Zhanhua Sag, Bohai Bay Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 38, 435-443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 高晓鹏. 沾车地区沙四上亚段湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特征研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2012.
[13] 蔡观强, 郭峰, 刘显太, 等. 沾化凹陷新近系沉积岩地球化学特征及其物源指示意义[J]. 地质科技情报, 2007(6): 17-24.
[14] 林承焰, 朱兆群, 刘魁元, 等. 济阳坳陷邵家地区沙四段油气成藏差异性及其定量评价[J]. 地学前缘, 2018, 25(4): 155-167.
[15] Bolhar, R. and Van Kranendonk, M.J. (2007) A Non-Marine Depositional Setting for the Northern Fortescue Group, Pilbara Craton, Inferred from Trace Element Geochemistry of Stromatolitic Carbonates. Precambrian Research, 155, 229-250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 闫伟鹏, 杨涛, 李欣, 等. 中国陆上湖相碳酸盐岩地质特征及勘探潜力[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2014, 19(4): 11-17.
[17] Lv, Z., Qing, Y., Zhao, F., et al. (2018) Diagenetic Evolution Characteristics of Paleogene Lacustrine Carbonate Reservoirs in Central Bohai Sea, China. Journal of Natural Gas Geoscience, 3, 243-252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 陈立. 微古地貌对湖相碳酸盐岩储层的控制作用——以沾化凹陷沙四上亚段储层为例[C]//中国地质学会沉积地质专业委员会, 中国矿物岩石地球化学学会沉积学专业委员会. 2015年全国沉积学大会沉积学与非常规资源论文摘要集, 2015: 2.
[19] 吴智平, 李伟, 郑德顺, 等. 沾化凹陷中、新生代断裂发育及其形成机制分析[J]. 高校地质学报, 2004(3): 405-417.
[20] 张凡芹, 王伟锋, 张晶, 等. 沾化凹陷断层对沉积的控制作用[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2005(5): 1-6.
[21] 穆娜娜. 沾车凹陷沙四上亚段湖相碳酸盐岩储层研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2011.
[22] 孙耀庭, 刘雅利, 巩建强, 等. 济阳坳陷沾化凹陷沙四上亚段灰质滩坝储层评价[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2016, 21(5): 62-69.
[23] 苏朝光. 沾车地区沙四段湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特征及储层物性[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2010, 17(6): 20-22+26+112.
[24] 吕姗姗. 基于岩石物理测试的碳酸盐岩弹性参数特征分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2012.
[25] 邢文军, 吴开龙, 吴鑫, 等. 储层砂岩宽频段地震岩石物理特征的实验研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2018, 33(4): 1609-1616.
[26] 唐杰, 郭渊, 孙成禹, 等. 碳酸盐岩波速与弹性模量变化规律试验研究[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 36(5): 62-66+71.
[27] 杜炳毅, 杨午阳, 王恩利, 等. 基于杨氏模量、泊松比和各向异性梯度的裂缝介质AVAZ反演方法[J]. 石油物探, 2015, 54(2): 218-225.
[28] Pei, F.G., Zou, C.C., He, T., et al. (2010) Fluid Sensitivity Study of Elastic Parameters in Low-Medium Porosity and Permeability Reservoir Rocks. Applied Geophysics, 7, 1-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] 孙兴刚, 魏文, 李红梅. 岩石物理参数的流体敏感性分析[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2012, 2(1): 37-40+49.
[30] 张秉铭, 刘致水, 刘俊州, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地北部复杂碳酸盐岩横波速度预测研究[J]. 石油物探, 2017, 56(3): 328-337.
[31] Adelinet, M., Fortin, J. and Guéguen, Y. (2011) Dispersion of Elastic Moduli in a Porous-Cracked Rock: Theoretical Predictions for Squirt-Flow. Tectonophysics, 503, 173-181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Sun, C., Borgomano, J.V.M., Fortin, J., et al. (2020) Effect of Pore Collapse and Grain Crushing on the Frequency Dependence of Elastic Wave Velocities in a Porous Sandstone. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 53, 5081-5093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef