乌鲁木齐机场持续浓雾的爆发性特征及成因分析
Analysis on the Explosive Characteristics and Trigger Conditions of Persistent Heavy Fog at Urumqi Airport
摘要: 利用常规气象资料,乌鲁木齐国际机场跑道自动气象观测系统(AWOS)、边界层风廓线雷达、微波辐射计等实时监测资料以及逐时新疆区域自动气象站资料,对乌鲁木齐机场2014年11月~2017年3月出现的47次持续浓雾天气的爆发性特征进行分析,主要结论如下:1) 乌鲁木齐机场持续浓雾天气中,爆发性发展个例占总数的34%,其中突变为强浓雾的又占爆发性发展个例的62.5%。2) 浓雾爆发性发展前后,地面相对湿度基本上处于并维持 ≥ 85%,风向维持或转变为北–东北和西–西北风,风速0~2 m/s。浓雾出现前5~15 min内的3.5℃•h−1~12℃•h−1、30 min内3.5℃•h−1~12℃•h−1的气温突降,或1~3 h内的1.5℃•h−1~3℃•h−1的持续降温,分别对应着能见度不同程度的迅速降低。边界层500 m以下以偏北和偏西风为主,近地层气温降低,相对湿度迅速增大到85%甚至95%左右,贴地逆温得以建立或加强。3) 浓雾爆发性发展前后,绝对湿度条件较稳定,近地层和地面的降温冷却作用,使得对相对湿度在短时间内达到高湿成雾条件,贴地逆温得以建立或加强,从水汽和层结两个方面都对浓雾爆发性发展有着触发作用。4) 辐射降温和局地偏北风平流降温是地面和近地层降温的主要原因。在有利的天气形势下,机场爆发性浓雾发生的预报关键点在于对地面和近地层降温时段和强度的预报,局地风场变化是温度预报的重要关联变量。
Abstract: Utilizing conventional meteorological data, real-time data from the automatic weather observation system (AWOS), boundary layer wind profiler radar, and microwave radiometer at Urumqi Interna-tional Airport, as well as hourly data from regional automatic weather stations across Xinjiang, this paper analyzes the explosive characteristics of 47 persistent heavy fog events occurring at Urumqi Airport from November 2014 to March 2017. The main conclusions are as follows: 1) Among the persistent heavy fog events, 34% showed explosive development, of which 62.5% abruptly intensi-fied into heavy fog. 2) While the explosive development of heavy fog was occurring, surface relative humidity persisted at or above 85%, with wind direction maintaining or shifting to norther-ly-northeasterly and westerly-northwesterly winds at 0~2 m/s. The temperature decreases of 3.5˚C•h−1~12˚C•h−1 within 5~15 minutes prior to fog onset, the temperature of 3.5˚C•h−1~12˚C•h−1 drops abruptly within 30 minutes, or sustained decreases of 1.5˚C•h−1~3˚C•h−1 in the preceding 1~3 hours, correspond to rapid visibility reduction to varying extents. In the boundary layer below 500 m, northerly and westerly winds prevail, along with decreasing ground layer temperature and rapidly rising relative humidity to around 85% or even 95%, during which ground temperature inversion is formed or intensified. 3) Before and after the explosive development of heavy fog, absolute humidity conditions remained relatively stable. The ground layer cooling strengthened relative humidity, rapidly attaining fog-forming threshold, during which ground temperature inversion was formed or intensified. Both the cooling and inversion played triggering roles in water vapor and stratification to the explosive development of the heavy fog. 4) Radiative cooling and advection cooling are the main reasons for surface and ground layer cooling. Under advantageous weather conditions, the key to forecasting the airport’s explosive fog lies in predicting the timing and inten-sity of surface and ground layer cooling, of which the local wind field is an important correlated var-iable.
文章引用:谭艳梅, 王春红, 王清平, 陈阳权. 乌鲁木齐机场持续浓雾的爆发性特征及成因分析[J]. 气候变化研究快报, 2023, 12(5): 1013-1021. https://doi.org/10.12677/CCRL.2023.125105

参考文献

[1] 黄继雄, 张庆红. 首都机场浓雾中的能见度突发性振荡及其演变规律[J]. 暴雨灾害, 2014, 33(3): 208-216.
[2] 邓长菊, 甘璐, 尤焕泠, 等. 北京城市浓雾特征及其与交通预报服务的关系[J]. 暴雨灾害, 2012, 31(2): 188-192.
[3] 濮梅娟, 严文莲, 商兆堂, 等. 南京冬季雾爆发性增强的物理特征研究[J]. 高原气象, 2008, 27(5): 1-8.
[4] 朱承瑛, 朱毓颖, 祖繁, 等. 江苏省秋冬季强浓雾发展的一些特征[J]. 气象, 2018, 44(9): 1208-1219.
[5] 方春刚, 郭学良. 华北一次浓雾过程爆发性增强的微物理特征[J]. 应用气象学报, 2019, 6(2): 700-709.
[6] 王庆, 李季, 樊明月. 济南爆发性增强冬季雾的物理特征分析[J]. 海洋气象学报, 2020, 2(9): 83-95.
[7] 牛生杰, 陆春松, 吕晶晶, 等. 近年来中国雾研究进展[J]. 气象科技进展, 2016, 6(2): 6-19.
[8] 王春红, 汪宏伟. 乌鲁木齐机场天气原因对航班正常性的影响及服务对策分析[J]. 空中交通管理, 2010, 2(z1): 47-50.
[9] 王清平, 朱蕾. 乌鲁木齐国际机场一次高影响大雾的成因分析[J]. 沙漠与绿洲气象, 2017, 11(6): 46-51.
[10] 郑玉萍, 李景林. 乌鲁木齐近31年大雾天气气候特征分析[J]. 气象, 2008, 34(8): 22-28.
[11] 张家宝. 新疆短期天气预报指导手册[M]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆人民出版社, 1986.
[12] 韩磊, 王春红, 王勇, 等. 乌鲁木齐国际机场“持续双低浓雾”天气特征分析[J]. 沙漠与绿洲气象, 2019, 13(5): 9-16.
[13] 奥银焕, 陈玉春, 吕世华. 准噶尔盆地冬季一个例低空风、温、湿场的数值模拟[J]. 高原气象, 2005, 24(2): 160-166.
[14] 李霞. 峡口城市乌鲁木齐冬季重污染的机理研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2015.
[15] 赵克明, 李霞, 孙鸣婧, 等. 乌鲁木齐冬季浅薄型焚风对大气扩散条件及空气质量的影响[J]. 沙漠与绿洲气象, 2019, 13(1): 13-20.