负压封闭引流联合皮瓣移植治疗慢性难愈性创面效果的Meta分析
Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Negative Pressure Closed Drainage Combined with Flap Transplantation in the Treatment of Chronic Refractory Wounds
DOI: 10.12677/NS.2023.125105, PDF,   
作者: 吴 璠, 刘斌礼:甘肃中医药大学护理学院,甘肃 兰州;魏万霞*, 沈彦萍:甘肃中医药大学附属医院麻醉手术科,甘肃 兰州
关键词: 负压封闭引流皮瓣移植慢性难愈性创面随机对照试验 Negative Pressure Closed Drainage Flap Transplantation Chronic Refractory Wounds Randomized Controlled Trial
摘要: 目的:系统评价负压封闭引流联合皮瓣移植应用于慢性难愈性创面的临床疗效。方法:计算机检索中国知网、万方、维普、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、PubMed、Web of Science、EMbase、The Cochrane Library等数据库,收集负压封闭引流联合皮瓣移植治疗慢性难愈性创面的随机对照试验(RCT),检索时限均为建库至2023年3月1日。由两名研究者按照纳排标准独立检索文献,采用Cochrane协作网的评价工具对纳入的文献进行质量评价,使用Revman5.4软件进行图表绘制及分析。结果:共纳入9篇RCT,包括570例患者,其中,试验组288例,对照组282例。meta分析结果显示,与对照组相比,试验组可提高治疗总有效率[RR = 1.34, 95%CI (1.22, 1.47), P < 0.00001]、降低创面感染发生率[RR = 0.20, 95%CI (0.06, 0.68), P = 0.01],缩短创面愈合时间[MD = −8.11, 95%CI (−11.32, −4.91), P < 0.00001]、缩短住院时间[MD = −9.52, 95%CI (−12.40, −6.64), P < 0.00001]。结论:负压封闭引流联合皮瓣移植在治疗慢性难愈性创面中有优越性,但受纳入研究质量和样本量的限制,今后可开展多中心、大样本的随机对照试验,进一步验证负压封闭引流联合皮瓣移植的应用效果。
Abstract: Objective: To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of negative pressure closed drainage combined with flap transplantation in chronic refractory wounds. Methods: The randomized controlled trial (RCT) of CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM), PubMed, Web of Science, EMbase, The Cochrane Library and negative pressure closed drainage and flap graft transplantation for chronic difficult wounds were collected for the database until March 1, 2023. Two researchers independently searched the literature according to the size exclusion standard, evaluated the quality of the included literature, and graphed and analyzed using Revman5.4 software. Results: Of 9 RCTs were included, including 570 patients, including 288 patients in the test group and 282 patients in the control group. The results of the meta-analysis showed that, Compared with the control group, The test group can improve the total response rate [RR = 1.34, 95%CI (1.22, 1.47), P < 0.00001], reduce the incidence of wound infection [RR = 0.20, 95%CI (0.06, 0.68), P = 0.01], Shorten the wound healing time [MD = −8.11, 95%CI (−11.32, −4.91), P < 0.00001], shortened the length of stay [MD = −9.52, 95%CI (−12.40, −6.64), P < 0.00001]. Conclusion: The combination of negative pressure closure and drainage combined with flap transplantation has advantages in the treatment of chronic difficult wounds, but limited by the study quality and the sample size, a randomized controlled trial with multiple centers and large samples can be carried out in the future to further verify the application effect of negative pressure closure and drainage combined with flap transplantation.
文章引用:吴璠, 魏万霞, 刘斌礼, 沈彦萍. 负压封闭引流联合皮瓣移植治疗慢性难愈性创面效果的Meta分析[J]. 护理学, 2023, 12(5): 744-752. https://doi.org/10.12677/NS.2023.125105

参考文献

[1] 廖文强, 詹剑华, 罗锦花, 等. 慢性创面临床防治的现状与思考[J]. 实用临床医学, 2021, 22(2): 83-89.
[2] Jär-brink, K., Ni, G., Sönnergren, H., et al. (2017) The Humanistic and Economic Burden of Chronic Wounds: A Protocol for a Systematic Review. Systematic Reviews, 6, Article No. 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Rondas, A.A., Schols, J.M., Stobberingh, E.E., et al. (2015) Prevalence of Chronic Wounds and Structural Quality Indicators of Chronic Wound Care in Dutch Nursing Homes. In-ternational Wound Journal, 12, 630-635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 秦峰, 吴宇, 黄伟谦, 等. 负压封闭引流联合氧疗在慢性创面修复治疗中的研究进展[J]. 联勤军事医学, 2023, 37(1): 80-84.
[5] 吕阳. 慢性难愈性创面的临床与基础研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 合肥: 安徽医科大学, 2023.
[6] 许飞. 富血小板血浆联合真空辅助闭合技术治疗难愈性创面的临床研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2020.
[7] 刘江涛, 赵男, 欧阳容兰, 等. 综合疗法在骶尾部压疮处理中的应用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2018, 13(1): 58-60.
[8] 莫济贤, 王宏伟, 高峰, 等. 皮瓣修复肢体慢性难愈性创面的远期疗效探析[J]. 医学理论与实践, 2015, 28(6): 721-722, 725.
[9] 邓锦华, 廖锵云, 方镇国. 皮瓣移植术联合负压封闭引流术对糖尿病足溃疡患者皮损面积及溃疡情况的影响[J]. 黑龙江医学, 2021, 45(15): 1585-1586.
[10] 袁野. 游离植皮、皮瓣移植联合VSD治疗慢性溃疡创面的效果分析[J]. 皮肤病与性病, 2020, 42(4): 604-605.
[11] 黄华森, 彭奇浩, 吴国轩, 等. VSD联合皮瓣移植治疗慢性溃疡创面效果分析[J]. 中国卫生标准管理, 2020, 11(2): 37-39.
[12] 孙阳, 沈国良, 赵小瑜, 等. 术前负压封闭引流联合局部旋转皮瓣修复骶尾部压力性损伤的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2019, 14(6): 443-448.
[13] 徐靖波, 王瑞瑞. 封闭负压引流技术联合皮瓣移植术对糖尿病足溃疡的应用[J]. 黑龙江医药科学, 2019, 42(2): 91-92.
[14] 杨凯, 薛朝亚, 刘学辉. 负压封闭引流联合游离皮瓣移植治疗长期慢性溃疡创面的效果观察[J]. 临床误诊误治, 2019, 32(4): 74-78.
[15] 林洪明, 李德胜. 游离植皮、皮瓣移植联合负压封闭引流术治疗长期慢性溃疡创面的临床效果及对疼痛的影响[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2018, 27(7): 740-743.
[16] 王付勇, 李华强. 负压封闭引流联合臀上动脉穿支皮瓣修复术治疗骶尾部压疮[J]. 中华实验外科杂志, 2016, 33(6): 1682-1683.
[17] 周文涛, 何国, 张文仕. VSD技术配合臀大肌肌皮瓣修复骶尾部压疮的临床分析[J]. 中国实用医药, 2015, 10(12): 33-34.
[18] Powers, J.G., Higham, C., Broussard, K., et al. (2016) Wound Healing and Treating Wounds: Chronic Wound Care and Management. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 74, 607-626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Werner, S. and Grose, R. (2003) Regulation of Wound Healing by Growth Factors and Cytokines. Physiological Reviews, 83, 835-870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] 吴兴康. 应用生物补片联合负压引流修补腹壁切口全层裂开22例的回顾性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 延安: 延安大学, 2021.
[21] Fleischmann, W., Strecker, W., Bombelli, M., et al. (1993) Vacuum Sealing as Treatment of Soft Tissue Damage in Open Fractures. Die Unfallchirurgie, 96, 488-492.
[22] 刘帆. 真空辅助闭合技术在慢性创面中的应用[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 重庆医科大学, 2022.
[23] 张延祠, 王浩汀, 崔树廷, 等. 封闭负压引流技术联合皮瓣移植术治疗糖尿病足溃疡效果观察[J]. 临床误诊误治, 2018, 31(11): 76-80.
[24] 谭敏飞, 李艾连. VSD联合皮瓣移植促进压疮创面愈合的安全性及效果研究[J]. 黑龙江医药, 2017, 30(5): 1140-1142.
[25] 黄波, 薛刚, 张彦标, 等. 负压封闭引流联合异种脱细胞真皮基质临时覆盖后延期植皮修复严重感染的腹壁缺损(附7例报告) [J]. 腹部外科, 2023, 36(1): 55-59.
[26] 陈斌, 胡伟, 荆志振, 等. 皮瓣移植结合VSD治疗慢性感染性创面32例[J]. 中华显微外科杂志, 2019, 42(4): 374-376.
[27] 李惠东, 杨乾坤, 李书慧, 等. 负压封闭引流技术对糖尿病足再发溃疡疗效的研究[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2017, 27(8): 1792-1794.
[28] Serra, R., Grande, R., Buffone, G., et al. (2016) Extracellular Matrix As-sessment of Infected Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers: Role of Metalloproteinases and Inflammatory Cytokines. International Wound Journal, 13, 53-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]