多模型融合的对抗网络图像去雾研究
Research on Defogging of Adversarial Network Images Based on Multi-Model Fusion
DOI: 10.12677/CSA.2023.1310179, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 尹思源, 王行建*:东北林业大学计算机与控制工程学院,黑龙江 哈尔滨
关键词: 图像去雾循环生成式对抗网络信息融合Image Defogging Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Network Information Fusion
摘要: 为了应对单一网络模型在雾天场景下去雾效果不理想的,去雾后图像颜色失真等问题,提出一种基于循环生成对抗网络(CycleGAN)的多去雾模型融合的去雾算法。首先,在整体去雾模型上,针对不同雾气浓度,将传统的单一模型改为多去雾模型,分别将不同浓度的雾气图像传入对应的去雾网络,接着在生成器模块中引入CBAM注意力机制,帮助模型可以更好的考虑通道上和空间上的影响,赋予重要特征以更多的权重,最后针对生成的无雾图像颜色失真问题,提出一种基于Lab色彩空间的新的色彩损失函数。实验结果表明,与传统的CycleGAN模型相比,本文算法在公共合成数据集和真实世界的图像上取得了更好的性能和更好的视觉效果。
Abstract: In order to deal with the problems such as the unsatisfactory effect of single network model in foggy scenes and the image color distortion after fog removal, a new algorithm based on the fusion of mul-tiple fog removal models based on CycleGAN was proposed. First of all, in terms of the overall de-fogging model, the traditional single model is changed into a multi-de-fogging model according to different fog concentrations, and the fog images of different concentrations are respectively intro-duced into the corresponding de-fogging network. Then, CBAM attention mechanism is introduced into the generator module to help the model better consider the influence on channel and space, and give more weight to important features. Finally, a new color loss function based on Lab color space is proposed to solve the color distortion problem of the generated fog free image. The exper-imental results show that compared with the traditional CycleGAN model, the proposed algorithm achieves better performance and better visual effect on public synthetic data sets and real world images.
文章引用:尹思源, 王行建. 多模型融合的对抗网络图像去雾研究[J]. 计算机科学与应用, 2023, 13(10): 1807-1816. https://doi.org/10.12677/CSA.2023.1310179

参考文献

[1] 董鹏曙, 向龙, 谢幼才, 等. 基于运动补偿的动目标检测处理方法[J]. 探测与控制学报, 2020, 42(6): 29-34.
[2] 刘尚旺, 崔智勇, 李道义. 基于Unet网络多任务学习的遥感图像建筑地物语义分割[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2020, 32(4): 74-83.
[3] Dou, Z., Han, Y., Sheng, W., et al. (2015) Image Dehaze Using Alternating Laplacian and Beltrami Regularizations. Journal of Electronic Imaging, 24, Article ID: 023004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 覃宏超, 李炎炎, 龙伟, 等. 基于引导滤波和暗原色先验理论透射率估值的视频去雾算法[J]. 浙江大学学报: 工学版, 2018, 52(7): 1302-1309.
[5] Jin, W., Mi, Z., Wu, X., et al. (2012) Single Image de-Haze Based on a Newdark Channel Estimation Method. 2012 IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Automation Engineering, Zhangjiajie, 25-27 May 2012, 791-795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Sengupta, D., Biswas, A. and Gupta, P. (2021) Non-Linear Weight Adjustment in Adaptive Gamma Correction for Image Contrast Enhancement. Multimedia Tools and Applica-tions, 80, 3835-3862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Tang, Q., Yang, J., He, X., et al. (2021) Nighttime Image Dehazing Based on Retinex and Dark Channel Prior Using Taylor Series Expansion. Computer Vision and Image Un-derstanding, 202, Article ID: 103086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Liang, J., Ju, H., Ren, L., et al. (2020) Generalized Polarimetric Dehazing Method Based on Low-Pass Filtering in Frequency Domain. Sensors, 20, 1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Chen, Z. and Ou, B. (2021) Visibility Detection Algorithm of Single Fog Image Based on the Ratio of Wavelength Residual Energy. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021, Article ID: 5531706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] He, K.M., Sun, J. and Tang, X.O. (2011) Single Image Haze Removal Using Dark Channel Prior. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 33, Article ID: 12301542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Ju, M., Ding, C., Zhang, D., et al. (2018) Gamma-Correction-Based Visibility Restoration for Single Hazy Images. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 25, 1084-1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Chen, D., He, M., Fan, Q., et al. (2019) Gated Context Aggrega-tion Network for Image Dehazing and Deraining. 2019 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 7-11 January 2019, Waikoloa Village, 1375-1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Li, B., Peng, X., Wang, Z., et al. (2017) Aod-Net: All-In-One Dehazing Network. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, 22-29 October 2017, 4770-4778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Cai, B., Xu, X., Jia, K., et al. (2016) Dehazenet: An End-to-End Sys-tem for Single Image Haze Removal. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 25, 5187-5198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Zhu, J.Y., Park, T., Isola, P., et al. (2017) Unpaired Im-age-to-Image Translation Using Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networks. Proceedings of the IEEE International Confer-ence on Computer Vision, Venice, 22-29 October 2017, 2223-2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Woo, S., Park, J., Iee, J.Y., et al. (2018) Cbam: Convolutional Block Attention Module. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Munich, 8-14 September 2018, 3-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., et al. (2014) Generative Adversarial Nets. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Sys-tems, Vol. 2, 2672-2680.
[18] 黄山, 贾俊. 基于改进循环生成式对抗网络的图像去雾方法[J]. 计算机工程, 2022, 48(12): 218-223, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Silberman, N., Hoiem, D., Kohli, P., et al. (2012) Indoor Segmentation and Support Inference from RGBD Images. Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Computer Vision, Florence, 7-13 October 2012, 746-760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Yuan, F. and Huang, H. (2018) Image Haze Removal via Ref-erence Retrieval and Scene Prior. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 27, 4395-4409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., et al. (2004) Image Quality Assessment: from Error Visibility to Structural Similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13, 600-612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Huynh-Thu, Q. and Ghanbari, M. (2008) Scope of Validity of PSNR in Image/Video Quality Assessment. Electronics Letters, 44, 800-801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef