100%低地板有轨电车新型复轨器强度分析
Strength Analysis and Experimental Study on the New Rail Re-Railer of 100% Low-Floor Tram
摘要: 以HT250、40Cr两种材质的新型复轨器为研究对象,在ABAQUS中建立了其有限元模型,控制两者边界条件和载荷工况相同的情况下,仿真分析得出HT250复轨器最大接触应力为600 MPa,超出了其许用应力。40Cr复轨器最大接触应力为818 Mpa,基于静力安定理论计算出40Cr复轨器的安定极限为1812 Mpa远大于仿真计算的最大接触应力,并采用E-N法在FE-SAFE计算其疲劳寿命为331,895次大于设计之初对其使用寿命的要求。之后进行了现场试验,HT250复轨器在试验中直接破损,40Cr复轨器复轨过程高效且平顺,完成复轨后40Cr复轨器没有破损仅在表面留下轻微变形,验证了仿真计算的正确性。
Abstract:
Taking HT250rerailer and 40Cr rerailer as the research object, the finite element model of HT250 rerailer and 40Cr rerailer is established in ABAQUS. Under the same boundary conditions and load conditions, the simulation analysis shows that the maximum contact stress of HT250 rerailer is 600 MPa, which exceeds its allowable stress. The maximum contact stress of the 40Cr rerailer is 818 Mpa. Based on the static stability theory, the stability limit of the 40Cr rerailer is 1812 Mpa, which is much larger than the maximum contact stress calculated by simulation, The fatigue life calculat-ed by E-N method in FE-SAFE is 331,895 times, which is greater than the requirement of its service life at the beginning of design. After that, the field test was carried out. The HT250 rerailer was di-rectly damaged in the test, and the rerailing process of the40 Cr rerailer was efficient and smooth. After the rerailing, the 40Cr rerailer was not damaged and only left a slight deformation on the sur-face, which verified the correctness of the simulation calculation.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
关鸣飞. 新型有轨电车的发展现状与应用前景[J]. 交通世界, 2020(17): 28-32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[2]
|
周旋, 杨辉. 国内低地板车辆的发展现状及趋势[J]. 机车车辆工艺, 2020(3): 13-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[3]
|
韩宝明, 习喆, 孙亚洁, 等. 2022年世界城市轨道交通运营统计与分析综述[J]. 都市快轨交通, 2023, 36(1): 1-8.
|
|
[4]
|
黄勇. 铁路车辆顶复救援效率与安全性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2015.
|
|
[5]
|
沈岳, 李月琳, 郭忠. 新型单人便携式矿车复轨器的研究与探索[J]. 现代制造技术与装备, 2020(6): 73-74+76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[6]
|
张驰, 王磊, 王昊. 铁路机车车辆液压起复机具机械装置研究[J]. 甘肃科技纵横, 2023, 52(1): 30-32+45.
|
|
[7]
|
韩吉元. 城市轨道交通车辆起复救援方案分析[J]. 农业装备与车辆工程, 2018, 56(3): 87-90.
|
|
[8]
|
范晓云. 100%低地板有轨电车复轨救援模式分析[J]. 城市轨道交通研究, 2015, 18(7): 129-132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[9]
|
白付维, 马林, 周康, 等. 高速铁路救援拉复装备研究[C]//中国铁道学会. 京沪高铁运营10周年学术论文集. 北京: 中国铁道出版社有限公司(CHINA RAILWAY PUBLISHING HOUSE CO.), 2022: 239-246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[10]
|
严国希, 李向红, 孙永全, 等. 一种有轨电车单边导向复轨装置[P]. 中国专利, CN218839442U, 2023-04-11.
|
|
[11]
|
蔡仲恒, 吴平景, 何厅. 五模块有轨电车牵引性能研究[J]. 科学技术创新, 2023(6): 189-192.
|
|
[12]
|
刘启跃. 钢轨的安定状态研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 1995(4): 466-471.
|
|
[13]
|
王镇, 董遇泰. 40Cr低周疲劳性能试验研究[J]. 机械强度, 1988(4): 64-66+52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|