力动态理论视角下幽默话语的取效行为研究——以岳云鹏孙越历届春晚相声表演为例
A Study on Perlocutionary Act of Verbal Hu-mor from the Perspective of Force Dynamics Theory—Taking Comic Dialogues by Yue Yunpeng and Sun Yue in Previous Spring Festival Galas as an Example
摘要: 幽默是一种特殊的言语行为，普遍存在于人类交际和日常生活中。本文基于Talmy提出的力动态理论，对岳云鹏和孙越在历届春晚舞台的相声表演中的幽默言语行为进行分析，根据言语行为作用的力动态图式探究其取效行为的达成，即幽默的产生机制。分析发现，岳孙相声幽默言语行为中存在至少三类取效行为：引起歧义、造成反转、互动呼应。从力动态角度看，取效行为作为作用力作用于听者，在持续施力的过程中使听者状态发生变化，产生幽默效果。
Abstract: Humor is a special kind of speech act, which generally lies in human communication and daily life. In view of Force Dynamic Theory proposed by Talmy, this paper analyzes the humorous speech acts selected from the comic dialogues of Yue Yunpeng and Sun Yue on the CCTV Spring Festival Gala, draws up the force dynamic schema of these speech acts, and finally illustrates the perlocutionary acts of humor, that is, the generation mechanism of humor. It comes to the conclusion that, humor-ous speech acts in Yue and Sun’s comic dialogues have at least three kinds of perlocutionary acts: Ambiguity, reversal and repeat. From the perspective of force dynamics, perlocutionary acts act on listeners, which changes the states of listeners during the continuous action of literal force, and fi-nally generates humor.
文章引用：郭皓. 力动态理论视角下幽默话语的取效行为研究——以岳云鹏孙越历届春晚相声表演为例[J]. 现代语言学, 2023, 11(10): 4250-4259. https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2023.1110571

参考文献

[1] Austin, J.L. (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[2] 梅那. 基于语用学的相声语言特点分析——评《相声大词典》[J]. 科技管理研究, 2022, 42(1): 223.
[3] 赵峰. 顺应论视角下言语幽默解读的认知语用研究[J]. 现代语文, 2021(12): 65-70.
[4] Raskin, V. (1985) Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. D. Reidel, Lancaster. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] Attardo, S. and Raskin, V. (1991) Script Theory Revis(it)ed: Joke Similarity and Joke Representation Model. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 4, 293-348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Yus, F. (2003) Humor and the Search for Relevance. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1295-1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] 蒋冰清. 关联理论对幽默话语的认知解读[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2008(4): 26-29.
[8] 蒋景阳. 溯因推理对幽默的解读[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2006(3): 21-24.
[9] 李捷. 模因论视域中的言语幽默[J]. 外语学刊, 2008(1): 74-78.
[10] 蒋冰清. 预设理论与言语幽默的生成机制阐释[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2009(3): 14-18+27.
[11] Mahna, H. (2012) An Exploration in the Language of Humor in English. In-ternational Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 1, 44-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] 丛日珍, 仇伟. 喜剧小品演员幽默言语行为预设策略与运行机制阐释——以小品《扶不扶》为例[J]. 西安外国语大学学报, 2015, 23(1): 29-32+63.
[13] 丛日珍. “预设” VS “前设”语用功能呈现及认知理据辨析——以中国现代喜剧小品为例[J]. 西安外国语大学学报, 2018, 26(3): 35-40.
[14] Brone, G. and Feyaerts, K. (2004) Assessing the SSTH and GTVH: A View from Cognitive Linguistics. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 17, 361-372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] 刘国辉. 言语幽默生成机制的认知探究——SCF、CI与CB三维互补视角[J]. 四川外语学院学报, 2006, 22(2): 135-139.
[16] 宋云霞, 杨维秀. 构式视角下的幽默生成机制探究——构式义与语境义的矛盾凸显[J]. 东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版), 2010(5): 106-109.
[17] 胡璇. 概念整合理论视角下的中国相声幽默言语分析[J]. 西安外国语大学学报, 2011, 19(3): 37-40.
[18] 陈澄. 基于泰尔米力动态图式中的幽默认知阐释[J]. 长春大学学报, 2020, 30(1): 54-60.
[19] 王文斌, 林波. 英语幽默言语的认知语用探究——兼论RT与CB的互补性[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报), 2003(4): 32-38.
[20] 刘平. 英语言语幽默的语用认知赏析——以关联理论与不和谐-消解理论为视角[J]. 广东外语外贸大学学报, 2006, 17(2): 31-34+92.
[21] Talmy, L. (2000) Toward a Cognitive Semantics. MIT Press, Cambridge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[22] 韩春兰. 语言与认知中的力动态系统阐释[J]. 山东社会科学, 2011(8): 104-107.
[23] Sweetster, E.E. (1990) From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]