水平底板索连续刚构桥施工阶段混凝土收缩徐变效应研究
Research on the Effects of Concrete Shrinkage and Creep during the Construction Stage of Continuous Rigid-Frame Bridge with Horizontal Bottom Slab Cables
摘要: 以贵州山区某高墩大跨水平底板索连续刚构桥为工程背景,采用有限元方法研究了混凝土收缩徐变对水平底板索连续刚构桥施工阶段力学性能的影响,并分析了环境相对湿度和混凝土加载龄期对桥梁施工阶段力学性能的影响。研究发现,在不同施工阶段,考虑混凝土收缩徐变时水平底板索连续刚构桥的挠度均大于不考虑混凝土收缩徐变时的挠度,而考虑混凝土收缩徐变时桥梁的压应力均略小于不考虑混凝土收缩徐变时的压应力。并且,随着环境相对湿度的增大,桥梁的挠度会减小,而压应力几乎不变。此外,随着混凝土加载龄期的增大,桥梁的挠度会先增大后减小,而压应力几乎不变。本文研究成果可为水平底板索连续刚构桥的设计和施工提供有益的指导。
Abstract: Taking a high-pier and large-span continuous rigid-frame bridge with horizontal bottom slab cables (CRFB-HBSC) in the mountainous area of Guizhou as the engineering background, the influence of concrete shrinkage and creep on the mechanical properties of the bridge during construction was studied using the finite element method, and the effects of environmental relative humidity and concrete loading age on the mechanical properties of the bridge during construction were analyzed. It was found that, at different construction stages, the deflection of the CRFB-HBSC considering concrete shrinkage and creep was greater than that without considering it, while the compressive stress of the bridge considering concrete shrinkage and creep was slightly smaller than that without considering it. Moreover, as the environmental relative humidity increased, the deflection of the bridge decreased, while the compressive stress remained almost unchanged. In addition, as the concrete loading age increased, the deflection of the bridge first increased and then decreased, while the compressive stress remained almost unchanged. The research results of this paper can provide beneficial guidance for the design and construction of CRFB-HBSC.
文章引用:马林东, 赵若朝, 陶勇. 水平底板索连续刚构桥施工阶段混凝土收缩徐变效应研究[J]. 土木工程, 2023, 12(10): 1238-1246. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJCE.2023.1210144

参考文献

[1] Yao, S., Peng, B., Wang, L. and Chen, H. (2022) Estimation Formula of Finished Bridge Pre-Camber in Continuous Rigid-Frame Bridges. Scientific Reports, 12, Article No. 16034.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] 韦仕荣, 杨斌, 陈闯, 徐桂弘, 汪权明. 贵都高速大跨径连续刚构桥-石门坎大桥长期挠度监测分析[J]. 土木工程, 2018, 7(3): 367-374.
[3] 唐文斌, 覃亮, 袁博, 陶勇. 预应力损失对水平底板索连续刚构桥施工阶段力学性能影响分析[J]. 土木工程, 2023, 12(4): 472-482.
[4] Zhao, J., Jia, H. and Zhan, Y. (2023) Seismic Vulnerability Analysis of Multi-Main-Span High Pier Continuous Rigid-Frame Bridge in Terms of Cloud Method. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 27, 2519-2534.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 郑婵. 不同收缩徐变模型下的刚构桥结构响应研究[J]. 黑龙江交通科技, 2022, 45(6): 79-81.
[6] 张飞, 黄福云, 王燕. V型墩刚构桥悬浇施工中应变修正与应力监测[J]. 山东建筑大学学报, 2020, 35(3): 36-41.
[7] 熊学玉, 黄炜一, 张亚东, 王国民. 预应力混凝土收缩徐变效应测试与分析[J]. 工业建筑, 2012, 42(4): 65-68.
[8] 张海洋. 大跨度PC刚构桥的徐变效应分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2014.
[9] 韩树亮. 混凝土收缩徐变对连续刚构桥施工及成桥的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2016.
[10] 向小斌. 大跨径连续刚构梁桥混凝土徐变试验研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2007.
[11] 王斐. 连续刚构桥施工监控与收缩徐变效应分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2007.
[12] 陈爽, 唐慧琪, 李继芸, 文涛, 陈威庭, 李福海. 低湿环境对连续刚构桥收缩徐变影响分析[J]. 施工技术(中英文), 2022, 51(18): 34-38.
[13] 马显红, 余毅. 高墩大跨连续刚构桥施工控制参数敏感性分析[J]. 桥梁建设, 2012, 42(3): 57-62.
[14] 洪帆, 周征征. 混凝土收缩徐变在连续刚构桥施工中的影响分析[J]. 交通科技, 2009(S1): 1-3.
[15] 车俊, 武维宏, 吴国松. 基于水平底板索理念的大跨度PC连续刚构桥徐变下挠控制措施研究及工程应用[J]. 工程建设与设计, 2022(11): 109-112.
[16] 吴国松, 胡嘉鸿. 一种预应力混凝土变截面箱桥梁及其施工方法[P]. 中国, CN201310007747.5. 2015-03-18.
[17] 中交公路规划设计院有限公司. JTG 3362-2018, 公路钢筋混凝土及预应力混凝土桥涵设计规范[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社股份有限公司, 2018.
[18] 徐梓宸. 收缩徐变对加劲钢桁连续刚构组合梁桥变形的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2018.
[19] 邓宜峰. 大跨连续刚构桥混凝土收缩徐变效应分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2018.
[20] 卓斌. 大跨连续刚构桥典型力学问题分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2007.
[21] 刘洁. 大跨径连续刚构桥混凝土收缩徐变效应分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 长安大学, 2011.