反刍思维量表的修订及信效度检验
Revision and Reliability and Validity Test of the Ruminative Responses Scale
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2023.1310526, PDF,   
作者: 王俊尧：重庆师范大学教育科学学院，重庆
关键词: 反刍思维；项目分析；信度；效度；Rumination； Item Analysis； Reliability； Validity
摘要: 目的：修订反刍思维量表，并在大学生群体中进行项目分析和信效度检验。方法：对1150名中国大学生施测，通过项目分析、探索性因素分析以及验证性因素分析等对量表的信效度进行讨论，最终形成了35题的反刍思维量表，共包含四个维度：享受快乐、积极应对、抑制快乐和消极应对，前两个维度属于积极反刍，后两个维度属于消极反刍。结果：经项目分析该问卷具有良好的区分度；信度分析表明，总量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.85，探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析显示研究中构建的反刍思维模型拟合较好。结论：修订后的反刍思维量表信效度良好，符合测量学要求，可作为正式测量工具使用。
Abstract: Objective: To revise the Ruminative Responses Scale and conduct item analysis and test the relia-bility and validity of the scale among college students. Methods: The revised Ruminative Responses Scale was administered to 1150 Chinese college students, and the reliability and validity of the scale was tested through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, resulting in a 35-item Ruminative Responses Scale with four dimensions: enjoyment of pleasure, positive response, inhibition of pleasure, and negative response, with the first two dimensions belonging to positive rumination, and the last two dimensions belonging to negative rumination. Results: Item analysis showed that the scale had good differentiation. Reliability analysis showed that the Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient of the Ruminative Responses Scale was 0.85. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis showed that the constructed ruminative responses model fitted well. Conclusion: The revised Ruminative Responses Scale has good reliability and validity, meets the requirements of psychometrics, and it can be used as a formal measurement tool.
文章引用：王俊尧 (2023). 反刍思维量表的修订及信效度检验. 心理学进展, 13(10), 4186-4193. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2023.1310526

参考文献

[1] 郭素然, 伍新春, 郭幽圻, 王琳琳, 唐顺艳(2011). 大学生反刍思维对消极情感和积极情感的影响——以孤独感和情绪智力为例. 心理发展与教育, 27(3), 329-336.
[2] 韩秀, 杨宏飞(2009). Nolen-Hoeksema反刍思维量表在中国的试用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 17(5), 550-551+549.
[3] 潘明军(2013). 反刍思维的应用研究及其问题. 山西高等学校社会科学学报, 25(3), 78-82.
[4] 王中(2016). 大学生反刍思维量表的编制及其初步应用. 硕士学位论文, 杭州: 浙江大学.
[5] Alloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y., Hogan, M. E., Whitehouse, W. G., Rose, D. T., Robinson, M. S., Kim, R. S., & Lapkin, J. B. (2000). The Temple-Wisconsin Cognitive Vulnerability to Depression Project: Lifetime History of Axis I Psy-chopathology in Individuals at High and Low Cognitive Risk for Depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 403-418.[CrossRef] 
[6] Bagby, R. M., Rector, N. A., Bacchiochi, J. R., & McBride, C. (2004). The Stability of the Response Styles Questionnaire Rumination Scale in a Sample of Patients with Major Depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 28, 527-538.[CrossRef] 
[7] Conway, M., Alfonsi, G., Pushkar, D., & Giannopoulos, C. (2008). Rumination on Sadness and Dimensions of Communality and Agency: Comparing White and Visible Minority Individuals in a Canadian Context. Sex Roles, 58, 738-749.[CrossRef] 
[8] Conway, M., Csank, P. A. R., Holm, S. L., & Blake, C. K. (2000). On Assessing Individual Differences in Rumination on Sadness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 404-425.[CrossRef] 
[9] Davydov, D. M., Zech, E., & Luminet, O. (2011). Affective Context of Sadness and Physiological Response Patterns. Journal of Psychophysiology, 25, 67-80.[CrossRef] 
[10] Fritz, H. L. (1999). Rumination and Adjustment to a First Coronary Event. Psychosomatic Medicine, 61, 105.[CrossRef] 
[11] Martin, L. L., & Tesser, A. (1996). Some Ruminative Thoughts. In R. S. Wyer Jr. (Ed.), Ruminative Thoughts (pp. 1-47). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
[12] Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1991). Responses to Depression and Their Effects on the Duration of Depressive Episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 569-582.[CrossRef] 
[13] Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Morrow, J. (1991). A Prospective Study of Depression and Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms after a Natural Disaster: The 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 115-121.[CrossRef] 
[14] Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Re-thinking Rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 400-424.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Roelofs, J., Muris, P., Huibers, M., Peeters, F., & Arntz, A. (2006). On the Measurement of Rumination: A Psychometric Evaluation of the Ruminative Response Scale and the Rumina-tion on Sadness Scale in Undergraduates. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 37, 299-313.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Rood, L., Roelofs, J., Bögels, S. M., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schou-ten, E. (2009). The Influence of Emotion-Focused Rumination and Distraction on Depressive Symptoms in Non-Clinical Youth: A Meta-Analytic Review. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 607-616.[CrossRef] [PubMed]