数字化背景下传统制造业与数据平台服务商协同创新的多主体演化博弈
A Multi-Agent Evolutionary Game of Collaborative Innovation between Traditional Manufacturing Industry and Data Platform Service Providers under the Background of Digitalization
摘要: 数字化背景下,传统制造业生产模式和运营模式遭受巨大冲击。而数据平台服务商的出现,数据赋能,知识共享等已成为后工业时代传统工业企业转型的共同认识;同时数据平台行业还较为年轻,商业背书与技术完善也需不断完善。本文从制造型企业供应链上下游企业协同入手,探讨传统制造业内部与外部数据服务平台企业的演化路径。本文对其进行数值仿真后,得出结论:信用水平,投机行为,成本与收益的比值,数智化程度都对传统制造企业与数据平台服务商协同创新的演化博弈有显著影响;并且利益分配系数的设置存在一个合理阈值;投机行为的收益与企业协同创新的概率成反比;成本与收益的比值越小,促使企业向{协同创新}策略演化概率越大;数智化程度越高,三主体协同创新的概率越大。
Abstract: Under the background of digitization, the production mode and operation mode of traditional manufacturing industry have suffered a great impact. The emergence of data platform service providers, data empowerment, knowledge sharing have become the common understanding of the transformation of traditional industrial enterprises in the post-industrial era. At the same time, the data platform industry is still relatively young, so business endorsement and technological improvement need to be constantly improved. Based on the collaboration between up-stream and downstream enterprises in the supply chain of manufacturing enterprises, this paper discusses the evolution path of internal and external data service platform enterprises in traditional manufacturing industries. After numerical simulation, some conclusions are drawn. Credit level, speculative behavior, ratio of cost to income, and degree of digital intelligence all have significant effects on the evolutionary game of collaborative innovation between tradition-al manufacturing enterprises and data platform service providers. And there is a reasonable threshold for the benefit distribution coefficient. The return of speculation is inversely proportional to the probability of collaborative innovation. The smaller the ratio of cost to benefit, the greater the probability of the enterprise to evolve to {collaborative innovation} strategy. The higher the degree of number intellectualization, the greater the probability of collaborative innovation of three subjects.
文章引用:张悦然. 数字化背景下传统制造业与数据平台服务商协同创新的多主体演化博弈[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2023, 13(5): 4765-4780. https://doi.org/10.12677/ORF.2023.135478

参考文献

[1] 陈剑, 刘运辉. 数智化使能运营管理变革: 从供应链到供应链生态系统[J]. 管理世界, 2020(11): 227-241.
[2] 陈剑, 黄朔, 刘运辉. 从赋能到使能——数字化环境下的企业运营管理[J]. 管理世界, 2020(2): 117-128+222.
[3] 孙聪, 魏江. 企业层创新生态系统结构与协同机制研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2019, 37(7): 1316-1325.
[4] 陈威如, 王节祥. 依附式升级: 平台生态系统中参与者的数字化转型战略[J]. 管理世界, 2021(10): 195-214.
[5] Li, L., Su, F., Zhang, W. and Mao, J.Y. (2018) Digital Transformation by SME Entre-preneurs: A Capability Perspective. Information Systems Journal, 28, 1129-1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 刘检华, 李坤平, 庄存波, 等. 大数据时代制造企业数字化转型的新内涵与技术体系[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2022, 28(12): 3707-3719.
[7] 解学梅, 陈佳玲. 供应链多维协同创新与企业绩效: 一项元分析的检验[J]. 管理工程学报, 2022(2): 20-36.
[8] 李柏洲, 王雪, 苏屹, 罗晓芳. 我国战略性新兴产业间供应链企业协同创新演化博弈研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021(8): 136-147.
[9] 解学梅, 刘丝雨. 协同创新模式对协同效应与创新绩效的影响机理[J]. 管理科学, 2015(3): 27-39.
[10] 张敬文, 李晓园, 徐莉. 战略性新兴产业集群协同创新发生机理及提升策略研究[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2016(11): 106-113.
[11] 杜传忠, 刘志鹏. 数据平台: 智能经济时代的关键基础设施及其规制[J]. 贵州社会科学, 2020(6): 108-115.
[12] 郑勇华, 孙延明, 尹剑峰. 工业互联网平台数据赋能、吸收能力与制造企业数字化转型[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(11): 19-30.
[13] 周晓阳, 李长长, 刘莹, 赵凡, 冯耕中, 汪寿阳. 工业互联网平台、开发商与企业的三方协作演化策略——兼论政府补贴和收益共享的作用[J/OL]. 中国管理科学, 2022: 1-14. 2023-10-08.[CrossRef
[14] 潘小军. 基于工业互联网平台的增值服务收费模式研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(11): 239-249.
[15] Athey, S. (2017) Beyond Prediction: Using Big Data for Policy Problems. Science, 355, 483-485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] 綦良群, 吴佳莹, 王智慧. 先进制造企业协同创新网络知识共享的演化博弈[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2023, 29(4): 1357-1370.