“双减”政策背景下K12教培从业人员的职业流动:现状、困境与启示
Occupational Mobility of K12 Education and Training Practitioners in the Context of “Double Reduction” Policy: Current Situation, Dilemma and Enlightenment
摘要: “双减”出台之后,国内的校外培训机构由于巨大的政策变动遭受了前所未有的行业寒冬,尤其是K12领域,几乎被全面喊停。在巨大的行业变动之下,原来从事K12教培行业的人员只能在其中夹缝生存,要不面临转型,要不跳出这个行业。目前这一部分群体人员众多,且多为受过良好教育的中青年,是社会上极其宝贵的人才资源,刻画他们的职业流动现状具有充足的研究意义。本研究通过问卷调查和实地调查两种方法,研究K12教培从业人员目前的职业流动现状、存在的困境等方面,通过多维度来测量在此政策形势下教培人员的职业流动现状,以期提供相应对策建议。
Abstract: After the introduction of “double reduction”, domestic off-campus training institutions suffered an unprecedented industry winter due to huge policy changes, especially in the K12 field, which was almost completely stopped. Under the huge changes in the industry, the original personnel engaged in the K12 education and training industry can only survive in the cracks, or face transformation, or jump out of the industry. At present, this part of the group has a large number of people, and most of them are well-educated young and middle-aged, which is an extremely valuable talent resource in the society. It is of sufficient research significance to describe the current situation of their occupational mobility. Through two methods of questionnaire survey and field investigation, this study studied the current status quo and existing difficulties of vocational mobility of K12 education and training practitioners, and measured the current situation of vocational mobility of education and training personnel in this policy situation through multiple dimensions, with a view to providing corresponding countermeasures and suggestions.
文章引用:周博. “双减”政策背景下K12教培从业人员的职业流动:现状、困境与启示[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2023, 13(5): 4895-4903. https://doi.org/10.12677/ORF.2023.135492

参考文献

[1] 李若建. 当代中国职业流动研究[J]. 人口研究, 1995(2): 18-23.
[2] 任远. 社会变革、机会结构变动和职业流动[J]. 社会科学, 1997(1): 56-59.
[3] 边燕杰, 张文宏. 经济体制、社会网络与职业流动[J]. 中国社会科学, 2001(2): 77-89.
[4] 朱志胜, 纪韶. 职业流动多元化研究的理论架构与实证分析[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2013(21): 85-90.
[5] 钟云华, 邓杨学, 李学勇. 大学毕业生职业流动现状及其促进对策[J]. 高教探索, 2015(1): 112-119.
[6] 郭怡, 刘钒, 朱秋锦. 传统性、现代性家庭价值观对职业流动影响的实证研究——基于CGSS2015数据[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2020(4): 35-43.
[7] 吕晓兰, 姚先国. 农民工职业流动类型与收入效应的性别差异分析[J]. 经济学家, 2013, 12(6): 57-68.
[8] 卓玛草, 孔祥利. 农民工留城意愿再研究——基于代际差异和职业流动的比较分析[J]. 人口学刊, 2016, 38(3): 96-105.
[9] 明娟. 工作转换对农民工职业流动的影响效应[J]. 人口与经济, 2016(4): 113-120.
[10] 周兴, 张鹏. 代际间的职业流动与收入流动——来自中国城乡家庭的经验研究[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2015, 14(1): 351-372.
[11] 解雨巷, 解垩. 教育流动、职业流动与阶层代际传递[J]. 中国人口科学, 2019(2): 40-52.
[12] 吴晓刚. 中国的户籍制度与代际职业流动[J]. 社会学研究, 2007, 22(6): 38-65.
[13] 林李月, 朱宇. 女性流动人口职业流动及其影响因素的代际差异与共性——以福建省为例[J]. 南方人口, 2015, 30(3): 24-34.
[14] 纪珽, 梁琳. 代际职业流动及其影响因素的性别差异[J]. 南开经济研究, 2020(2): 25-48.
[15] 李旻, 王秋兵. 已婚女性农民工的职业流动与收入效应——基于辽宁省的实证分析[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017(5): 79-86.
[16] 周洪宇, 齐彦磊. “双减”政策落地: 焦点、难点与建议[J]. 新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 43(1): 122-131.
[17] 龙宝新. 中小学学业负担的增生机理与根治之道——兼论“双减”政策的限度与增能[J]. 南京社会科学, 2021(10): 146-155.
[18] 袁磊, 雷敏, 张淑鑫, 等. 把脉“双减”政策构建在线教育信息安全体系[J]. 现代远程教育研究, 2021, 33(5): 3-13.
[19] 刘志杰. 别忘关注“双减”下的教培人员[N]. 四川日报, 2021-08-30(011).
[20] Deng, Z. and Treiman, D.J. (1997) The Impact of the Cultural Revolution on Trends in Educational Attainment in the People’s Republic of China. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 391-428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef