老年不稳定性股骨粗隆间骨折内固定治疗方法选择
Selection of Internal Fixation for Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture in Elderly Patients
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2023.13102263, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 胡元斌:东南大学附属中大医院骨科,江苏 南京;李永顺, 刘 冬:南京市大厂医院骨科(东南大学附属中大医院江北院区骨科),江苏 南京
关键词: 股骨粗隆间骨折股骨近端防旋髓内钉动力髋螺钉内固定不稳定疗效观察Intertrochanteric Fracture Proximal Femoral Antirotationnail Dynamic Hip Screw Internal Fixation Unstable Curative Effect Observation
摘要: 目的:通过评估股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)和动力髋螺钉(DHS)两种外科技术治疗老年不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折,来选择适宜的内固定方法,以及如何确保该病人得到最好治疗。方法:回顾性分析我院创伤骨科85例老年不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折患者,其中,43例PFNA治疗,42例DHS治疗,分别从术中时长、出血量、切口长度以及术后功能锻炼恢复时长进行详细记录并评估,以确保统计其术后髋关节功能的恢复效果。结果:85例患者中,随访6~16个月(平均11.6个月),无死亡病例。PFNA组与DHS组在手术切口长度、术中时长、出血量、术后功能锻炼恢复时长方面有统计学差异(P < 0.05),在骨折愈合时间、并发症发生率上亦有统计学差异(P < 0.05)。在髋关节功能恢复程度上,PFNA组优良率为46.5%,较DHS组45.2%稍高,没有明显差异(P > 0.05)。结论:本研究发现老年不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折,髓内PFNA固定较髓外DHS固定具有更好的临床疗效。
Abstract: Objective: Proximal femoral nail antirotation nail (PFNA) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) were two kinds of surgical procedures. Treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly through the two surgical procedures, we can select the appropriate method of internal fixation. Methods: Through retrospective analysis of 85 elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fracture in trauma department of orthopedics of our hospital, 43 cases were treated with PFNA in-ternal fixation, 42 cases of DHS served as control group. PFNA group and DHS group were compared from 6 aspects, such as, the length of incision, the time of operation, amount of bleeding from surgi-cal operation, postoperative rehabilitation exercise time, functional recovery of hip joint and frac-ture healing time. Results: 85 patients were followed up for 6~16 months (mean 11.6 months) without death. There was statistical difference between group PFNA and group DHS (P < 0.05) among the length of incision, the time of operation, the amount of bleeding and the time of rehabil-itation exercises. There was also statistical difference in the time of fracture healing and the inci-dence of complications (P < 0.05). The excellent and good rate of group PFNA was 46.5%, which was higher than that of group DHS (45.2%). There was no significant difference in the functional recov-ery of the hip joint (P > 0.05). Conclusions: This study has found that for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients, intramedullary PFNA fixation has better clinical efficacy than ex-tramedullary DHS fixation.
文章引用:胡元斌, 李永顺, 刘冬. 老年不稳定性股骨粗隆间骨折内固定治疗方法选择[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(10): 16185-16190. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.13102263

参考文献

[1] 程学好, 韩江伟, 李星江. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者应用股骨近端防旋髓内钉手术治疗的效果分析[J]. 世界复合医学, 2023, 9(1): 55-58.
[2] 汪大明, 胡靖, 宋峰, 等. 股骨近端防旋髓内钉不同手术时机治疗股骨粗隆间骨折临床疗效[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2022, 50(4): 382-385.
[3] 王笑山. 股骨近端交锁髓内钉与股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定术治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折患者的临床效果[J]. 医疗装备, 2022, 35(6): 104-106.
[4] 刘健秋, 陈学袖, 郭文杰. 不同髓内钉治疗不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折预后比较[J]. 深圳中西医结合杂志, 2022, 32(5): 111-114.
[5] 田永新. 股骨粗隆间骨折患者应用股骨近端髓内钉固定治疗的临床效果分析[J]. 甘肃科技, 2022, 38(4): 112-114.
[6] 李永升, 柯丽秀, 赵志明. 股骨近端防旋髓内钉与动力髋螺钉对不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折患者SOD、AngⅡ的影响[J]. 河北医药, 2020, 42(9): 1328-1331.
[7] 郑勇, 史法见, 赵晓龙, 等. PFNA与DHS+空心钉内固定治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效观察[J]. 组织工程与重建外科杂志, 2019, 15(5): 345-348.
[8] Cheng, T., Zhang, G. and Zhang, X. (2011) Review: Minimally Invasive versus Conventional Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation in Elderly Patients with Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Surgical Innovation, 18, 99-105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Yang, E., Qureshi, S., Trokhan, S., et al. (2011) Gotfried Percutaneous Compression Pating Compared with Sliding Hip Screw Fixation of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 93, 942-947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Miyamoto, R.G., Kaplan, K.M., Levine, B.R., et al. (2008) Surgical Management of Hip Fractures: An Evidence- Based Review of the Literature. I: Femoral Neck Fractures. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 16, 596-607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 徐锦良, 黄武全, 谭海梅, 等. 股骨近端抗旋髓内钉与动力髋螺钉对老年不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效及并发症比较[J]. 智慧健康, 2022, 8(11): 64-67.
[12] 胡靖, 王林, 陈义, 宋峰. 防旋股骨近端髓内钉治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的效果及对髋关节功能、生活质量和日常生活能力的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2022, 42(12): 2918-2920.
[13] 王宗, 张亚鹏, 刘永. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者应用防旋股骨近端防旋髓内钉与近端解剖钢板的疗效分析[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2021, 20(4): 414-417.
[14] Simmermacher, R.K., Ljungqvist, J., Bail, H., et al. (2008) The New Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) in Daily Practice: Results of a Multicentre Clinical Study. Injury, 39, 932-939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Gadegone, W.M. and Salphale, Y.S. (2007) Proximal Femoral Nail—An Analysis of 100 Cases of Proximal Femoral Fractures with an Average Follow up of 1 Year. International Orthopaedics, 31, 403-408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Sadowski, C., Lübbeke, A., Saudan, M., et al. (2002) Treatment of Reverse Oblique and Transverse Intertrochanteric Fractures with Use of an Intramedullary Nail or a 95 Degrees Screw-Plate: A Prospective, Randomized Study. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 84, 372-381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef