从五味起源与发展再认识五味配伍关系
Understanding the Compatibility of Five Fla-vors from the Origin and Development of Five Flavors
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2023.13102297, PDF,   
作者: 周洵聿:黑龙江中医药大学第一临床医学院,黑龙江 哈尔滨
关键词: 五味五行学说演变传统理论Five Flavors Five Elements Theory Evolution Traditional Theory
摘要: 传统中医理论认为五味配伍关系为:酸属肝木、苦属心火、甘属脾土、辛属肺金、咸属肾水,此本流传千古、无可非议之基础定律。然现中医界有部分学者因在中医古籍中发现有部分论述与此不符,便断章取义,另立它说。但反复揣摩此类表述,不过街谈巷议之论,且竟皆以抛弃基础理论为荣,终使临床运用五味配伍关系落入窘迫之境。面对如此困境,若欲使五味配伍关系能更好地运用于临床,并防坐而论道之误,唯有将基础理论回归实践始终,探本溯源让五味配伍关系回归五味起源与发展,再认识五味配伍关系的普遍性规律和特殊性运用以重申传统五味配伍关系之正确性。
Abstract: According to the traditional Chinese medicine theory, the compatibility relationship of five flavors is: acid belongs to liver wood, bitter belongs to heart fire, sweet belongs to spleen soil, Xin belongs to lung gold, and salt belongs to kidney water. This book has been handed down for thousands of years and is an indisputable basic law. However, some scholars in the field of traditional Chinese Medicine found that some of the statements in the ancient books of traditional Chinese medicine were incon-sistent with this, so they took them out of context and established another theory. However, re-peated speculation about such statements is just street talk, and they are proud to abandon the basic theory, which eventually makes the clinical application of the compatibility of five flavors into a dilemma. In the face of such a dilemma, if we want to better apply the five-flavor compatibility re-lationship in clinical practice and prevent the mistakes of sitting on the sidelines, we can only re-turn the basic theory to practice all the time, explore the origin and make the five flavor compati-bility relationship return to the origin and development of the five flavors, and then understand the universal law and special application of the five flavor compatibility relationship to reaffirm the correctness of the traditional five flavor compatibility relationship.
文章引用:周洵聿. 从五味起源与发展再认识五味配伍关系[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(10): 16412-16417. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.13102297

参考文献

[1] 李具双. 《辅行诀脏腑用药法要》中《汤液经法》图试读[J]. 中国中医基础医学杂志, 2008, 14(5): 325-327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 梁永林, 李生财, 贾育新. 《辅行诀脏腑用药法要》五味的五行归属辨识[J]. 中医药学刊, 2002, 20(4): 491-492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 郝永龙, 陈美荣, 刘向红, 等. 基于象思维重新认识中药五味五行配属理论[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2018, 33(11): 4793-4796.
[4] 周琳, 景方建. 对《内经》《辅行诀》五味对应五行、五味补泻五脏的商榷[J]. 中医药学报, 2019, 47(4): 102-105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 李壮鹰. 滋味说探源[J]. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 1997(2): 68-74.
[6] (战国)荀况, 著. 荀子[M]. 谢丹, 书田, 译注. 上海: 书海出版社, 2001.
[7] (春秋)管仲, 撰. 吴文涛, 张善良, 编著. 管子[M]. 北京: 北京燕山出版社, 1995.
[8] 百子全书•鹃冠子[M]. 杭州: 浙江人民出版社, 1984.
[9] 张卫. “五味”理论溯源及明以前中药“五味”理论系统之研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国中医科学院, 2012.
[10] (唐)孔颖达. 尚书正义[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 1999.
[11] 张瑞贤, 张卫. 先秦时期非医学文献对“味”的认识[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2010, 35(4): 511-514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] (金)刘完素, 撰. 素问玄机原病式[M]. 石学文, 点校. 沈阳: 辽宁科学技术出版社, 1997.
[13] 佚名. 神农本草经[M]. 北京: 学苑出版社, 2004.
[14] (春秋)孔子, 著. 论语[M]. 杨伯峻, 杨逢彬, 注译. 杨柳岸, 导读. 长沙: 岳麓书社, 2018.
[15] (明)王阳明, 著. 传习录[M]. 张怀承, 注译. 长沙: 岳麓书社, 2004.