单核细胞/高密度脂蛋白比值对冠心病患者不良心血管事件预测价值的分析
Predictive Value of Monocyte to High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio for Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2023.13102338, PDF,   
作者: 马清玉:石河子大学医学院,新疆 石河子;吐尔孙阿依·依斯米提拉, 马艺萍:新疆医科大学研究生院,新疆 乌鲁木齐;穆叶赛·尼加提*:新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院急救中心,新疆 乌鲁木齐
关键词: 冠心病单核细胞/高密度脂蛋白比值预后Coronary Heart Disease Monocyte to High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio Prognosis
摘要: 目的:探讨冠心病(CHD)患者单核细胞/高密度脂蛋白比值(MHR)预测近期心血管不良事件发生的价值。方法:选取2021年6月至2022年6月,在新疆自治区人民医院心内科确诊并收治的冠心病患者90例作为研究对象,记录随访CHD患者1年内出现的死亡、心肌梗死、再次血运重建等不良事件,根据其是否发生不良心血管事件(MACEs)分为MACEs组(14例),未发生MACEs组(76例)。根据MHR水平将患者分为高MHR组和低MHR组,比较两组间发生MACEs的区别。绘制ROC工作曲线分析MHR预测冠心病不良事件的预测价值。结果:MACEs组性别、年龄、BMI、吸烟史、饮酒史、收缩压、血小板、D-二聚体、AST、ALT、血糖、肌酐等结果均无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。非MACEs组MHR、单核细胞水平低于MACEs组(P < 0.05)。单因素Logistic回归分析结果表明,MHR (OR = 20.695, 95% CI: 2.546~168.186, P = 0.005),MHR与冠心病患者发生MACEs有相关性,多因素Logistic回归分析结果表明,MHR (OR = 122.128, 95% CI: 4.213~3839.963, P = 0.005)是冠心病患者MACE的危险因素。MHR预测发生MACEs的AUC、敏感度、特异性、最佳阶段点、最大约登指数分别为0.787 (95% CI: 0. 657~0.916)、71.4%、73.7%、0.60、0.45。高MHR组主要不良心血管事件发生率为33.33% (10/30),高于低MHR组6.67% (4/60),P < 0.05。结论:MHR是冠心病不良事件的危险因素,检测MHR水平对预测冠心病患者发生MACEs有一定价值。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the value of monocyte to high density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (MHR) in predicting in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Method: A total of 90 patients with coronary heart disease diagnosed and treated in the Department of Cardiology of Xinjiang Autono-mous Region People’s Hospital from June 2021 to June 2022 were selected as the study objects. Ad-verse events such as death, myocardial infarction and revascularization in CHD patients within 1 year of follow-up were recorded. They were divided into MACEs group (14 cases) and MACEs group (76 cases) according to whether they had adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Divide patients into high MHR group and low MHR group based on MHR levels, and compare the differences in the occurrence of MACEs between the two groups. Draw ROC working curves to analyze the predictive value of MHR in predicting adverse events of coronary heart disease. Results: There were no signif-icant differences in gender, age, BMI, smoking history, drinking history, systolic blood pressure, platelet, D-dimer, AST, ALT, blood glucose and creatinine in MACEs group (P > 0.05). The levels of MHR and monocyte in non-MACES group were lower than those in MACEs group (P < 0.05). The sin-gle factor logistic regression analysis results showed that MHR (OR = 20.695, 95% CI: 2.546~168.186, P = 0.005), there is a correlation between MHR and the occurrence of MACEs in pa-tients with coronary heart disease. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that MHR (OR = 122.228, 95% CI: 4.213~3839.963, P = 0.005) is a risk factor for MACE in patients with coronary heart disease. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, optimal stage point and maximum Jordan index for predicting the occurrence of MACEs by MHR were 0.787 (95% CI: 0657~0 916), 71.4%, 73.7%, 0.60, 0.45. The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events in the high MHR group was 33.33% (10/30), which was higher than 6.67% (4/60) in the low MHR group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: MHR is a risk factor for adverse CHD events, and detecting MHR levels has certain value in predicting the occurrence of MACEs in coronary heart disease patients in the short term.
文章引用:马清玉, 吐尔孙阿依·依斯米提拉, 马艺萍, 穆叶赛·尼加提. 单核细胞/高密度脂蛋白比值对冠心病患者不良心血管事件预测价值的分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(10): 16707-16714. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.13102338

参考文献

[1] Kang, W. and Malvaso, A. (2023) Mental Health in Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) Patients: Findings from the UK Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS). Healthcare (Basel), 11, Article No. 1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Dai, H., Much, A.A., Maor, E., et al. (2022) Global, Regional, and National Burden of Ischaemic Heart Disease and Its Attributable Risk Factors, 1990-2017: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. European Heart Journal—Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes, 8, 50-60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 胡盛寿, 王增武. 《中国心血管健康与疾病报告2022》概述[J]. 中国心血管病研究, 2023, 21(7): 577-600.
[4] Sigamani, A. and Gupta, R. (2022) Revisiting Secondary Prevention in Coronary Heart Disease. Indian Heart Journal, 74, 431-440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Yan, S., Sha, S., Wang, D., et al. (2023) Association between Monocyte to High-Density Lipoprotein Ratio and Coronary Heart Disease in US Adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2009-2018. Coronary Artery Disease, 34, 111-118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Hirata, A., Kakino, A., Okamura, T., et al. (2020) The Relationship between Serum Levels of LOX-1 Ligand Containing ApoAI as a Novel Marker of Dysfunctional HDL and Coronary Artery Calcification in Middle-Aged Japanese Men. Atherosclerosis, 313, 20-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Jiang, M., Yang, J., Zou, H., et al. (2022) Mono-cyte-to-High-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol Ratio (MHR) and the Risk of All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality: A Nationwide Cohort Study in the United States. Lipids in Health and Disease, 21, Article No. 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Ma, M., Liu, Y., Wang, L., et al. (2022) Relationship between Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as Well as Other Leukocyte-Derived Ratios and Carotid Plaques in Patients with Coro-nary Heart Disease: A RCSCD-TCM Study. Journal of Inflammation Research, 15, 5141-5156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Shi, C. and Pamer, E.G. (2011) Monocyte Recruitment during Infection and Inflammation. Nature Reviews Immunology, 11, 762-774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Joshi, A., Bhambhani, A., Barure, R., et al. (2023) Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio as Markers of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease in Diabetic Patients: An Observational Study. Medicine (Baltimore), 102, e32735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Kang, W. and Malvaso, A. (2023) Understanding Cognitive Deficits in People with Coronary Heart Disease (CHD). Journal of Personalized Medicine, 13, Article No. 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] 《中国心血管健康与疾病报告2021》要点解读[J]. 中国心血管杂志, 2022, 27(4): 305-318.
[13] Sundjaja, J.H. and Pandey, S. (2022) Cholesterol Screening. StatPearls, Treasure Is-land.
[14] Calabresi, L., Gomaraschi, M. and Franceschini, G. (2003) Endothelial Protection by High-Density Lipopro-teins: From Bench to Bedside. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 23, 1724-1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Wirtz, P.H. and Von Känel, R. (2017) Psychological Stress, Inflammation, and Coronary Heart Disease. Current Cardiology Reports, 19, Article No. 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Xi, J., Men, S., Nan, J., et al. (2022) The Blood Monocyte to High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio (MHR) Is a Possible Marker of Carotid Artery Plaque. Lipids in Health and Disease, 21, Article No. 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Zhao, Z., Lian, H., Liu, Y., et al. (2023) Application of Systemic Inflammation Indices and Lipid Metabolism-Related Factors in Coronary Artery Disease. Coronary Artery Disease, 34, 306-313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Chen, J., Wu, K., Cao, W., et al. (2023) Association be-tween Monocyte to High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio and Multi-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study. Lipids in Health and Disease, 22, Article No. 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Ucar, F.M. (2016) A Potential Marker of Bare Metal Stent Restenosis: Monocyte Count-to-HDL Cholesterol Ratio. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 16, Article No. 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Du, G.L., Liu, F., Liu, H., et al. (2023) Monocyte-to-High Den-sity Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio Positively Predicts Coronary Artery Disease and Multi-Vessel Lesions in Acute Cor-onary Syndrome. International Journal of General Medicine, 16, 3857-3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Liu, M., Liu, X., Wei, Z., et al. (2022) MHR and NHR but Not LHR Were Associated with Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Chest Pain with Controlled LDL-C. Journal of Investi-gative Medicine, 70, 1501-1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]