MOOCs持续使用意愿的元分析
A Meta-Analysis of Continuance Intention to Use MOOCs
DOI: 10.12677/ASS.2023.1210818, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 吴 冰, 刘心悦:同济大学经济与管理学院,上海
关键词: 元分析MOOCs持续使用使用意愿文化差异Meta-Analysis MOOCs Continuous Use Behavioral Intention Cultural Differences
摘要: 研究采用元分析法,综合技术接受模型(TAM)和期望确认模型(ECM),同时纳入文化调节因素,构建研究模型,探究MOOCs持续使用意愿的影响因素。研究结果表明,首先,感知有用性、感知易用性、使用态度、满意度、内在动机和社会影响都直接正向影响MOOCs持续使用意愿,其中,满意度的影响最大;其次,期望确认可以分别通过满意度和感知有用性对MOOCs持续使用意愿产生正向影响,感知有用性和感知易用性都能通过使用态度对MOOCs持续使用意愿产生正向影响;第三,在个人主义文化中,感知有用性和使用态度对MOOCs持续使用意愿的影响更大。
Abstract: By using meta-analysis, on basis of extensively collecting empirical studies on the continuous use of MOOCs, this study integrated theories related to technology acceptance model (TAM) and expectation confirmation model (ECM), and included cultural adjustment factors to construct a comprehensive research model, so as to explore the influencing factors of the continuance intention to use MOOCs. The research results show that, firstly, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitude towards using MOOCs, satisfaction, intrinsic motivation and social influence all directly and positively affect the intention to continue using MOOCs, of which satisfaction has the greatest impact; secondly, expectation confirmation can indirectly have a positive impact on the continuance intention to use MOOCs through satisfaction and perceived usefulness respectively, and both perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use can have a positive impact on the continuance intention to use MOOCs through attitudes, thirdly, perceived usefulness and attitude towards using MOOCs have a greater impact on the continuance intention to use MOOCs in the individualistic culture when compared with collectivist culture.
文章引用:吴冰, 刘心悦. MOOCs持续使用意愿的元分析[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2023, 12(10): 5962-5969. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2023.1210818

参考文献

[1] Chaker, R., Bouchet, F. and Bachelet, R. (2022) How do Online Learning Intentions Lead to Learning Outcomes? The Mediating Effect of the Autotelic Dimension of Flow in a MOOC. Computers in Human Behavior, 134, Article 107306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Ma, L., Sharif, S.P., Ray, A. and Khong, K.W. (2023) Investigating the Relationships Between MOOC Consumers’ Perceived Quality, Emotional Experiences, and Intention to Recommend: An NLP-Based Approach. Online Information Review, 47, 582-603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] McShane, B.B. and Bockenholt, U. (2023) Multilevel Multivariate Meta-Analysis Made Easy: An Introduction to MLMVmeta. Behavior Research Methods, 55, 2367-2386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Wu, B. and Chen, X.H. (2017) Continuance Intention to Use MOOCs: Integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Task Technology Fit (TTF) Model. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 221-232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Dai, H.M., Teo, T. and Rappa, N.A. (2020) Understanding Continuance Intention among MOOC Participants: The Role of Habit and MOOC Performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, Article ID: 106455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F. (2003) User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. Mis Quarterly, 27, 425-478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Hsu, J.Y., Chen, C.C. and Ting, P.F. (2018) Understanding MOOC Continuance: An Empirical Examination of Social Support Theory. Interactive Learning Environments, 26, 1100-1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Al-Mekhlafi, A.A., Othman, I., Kineber, A.F., Mousa, A.A. and Zamil, A.M.A. (2022) Modeling the Impact of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) Implementation Factors on Continuance Intention of Students: PLS-SEM Approach. Sustainability, 14, Article 5342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Bhattacherjee, A. (2001) Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. MIS Quarterly, 25, 351-370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 吴冰, 赛争奇. MOOCs采纳行为意图的元分析[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2022(12): 5159-5168.
[11] Abdullatif, H. and Velazquez-Iturbide, J.A. (2020) Relationship between Motivations, Personality Traits and Intention to Continue Using MOOCs. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 4417-4435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 杜艺华. 高校大学生MOOC使用意愿影响因素分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2019
[13] 崔春阳, 戴心来, 单畅. MOOC学习者持续学习意愿影响因素研究[J]. 中国教育信息化, 2017(15): 5-8+12.
[14] Reparaz, C., Aznarez-Sanado, M. and Mendoza, G. (2020) Self-Regulation of Learning and MOOC Retention. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, Article ID: 106423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 何敏. 自我调节学习策略对MOOCs学习者的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2020.
[16] 曾子明, 郑安安. 中国大学MOOC平台学习者持续使用意愿影响因素研究[J]. 中国教育信息化, 2019(16): 28-33.
[17] 韩冬梅, 夏丽华. 基于HMM模型的MOOCs持续使用行为影响因素研究[J]. 情报科学, 2020, 38(12): 70-77.
[18] Tarhini, A., Hone, K., Liu, X.H. and Tarhini, T. (2017) Examining the Moderating Effect of Individual-Level Cultural Values on Users’ Acceptance of E-Learning in Developing Countries: A Structural Equation Modeling of an Extended Technology Acceptance Model. Interactive Learning Environments, 25, 306-328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Banovic, M. and Grunert, K.G. (2023) Consumer Acceptance of Precision Fermentation Technology: A Cross-Cultural Study. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 88, Article ID: 103435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Boimah, M. and Weible, D. (2023) Origin and Dairy Consumption in West Africa: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Consumer Behaviour. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 9, Article ID: 2226466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Yu, Z.G. Xu, W. and Sukjairungwattana, P. (2022) A Me-ta-Analysis of Eight Factors Influencing MOOC-Based Learning Outcomes across the World. Interactive Learning Environments, 7, 1-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Borenstein, M., Hedges, L.V. Higgins, J.P.T. and Rothstein, H.R. (2009) Introduction to Meta-Analysis. 1st Edition, Wiley, Hoboken.