初中数学试题难度模型构建与分析
Construction and Analysis of the Difficulty Model for Middle School Mathematics Exams
摘要: 在鲍建生五因素难度模型的基础上,定义难度因素水平并改进了数学试题难度模型。选取宁波市部分中考题为例,编制试题难度影响因素调查问卷,再采用探索性因子分析、多元线性回归等统计方法分析调查数据,得出试题难度的8个核心影响因素,结合概念性要素、程序性要素、情境性及层次性要素3个维度,构建初中数学试题难度线性模型,并对模型的有效性进行了验证。
Abstract:
On the basis of Bao Jiansheng’s five factor difficulty model, the difficulty factor level was defined and the mathematical test paper difficulty model was improved. Taking some high school entrance examination questions in Ningbo City as examples, a survey questionnaire on factors affecting difficulty in test papers was developed. Exploratory factor analysis, multiple linear regression, and other statistical methods were used to analyze the survey data, and eight core influencing factors of test paper difficulty were identified. Combining three dimensions, which are conceptual elements, procedural elements, situational elements, and hierarchical elements, a linear model of difficulty in middle school mathematics test papers was constructed, and the effectiveness of the model was verified.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
邵志芳, 刘永芳, 钟毅平. 关于问题难度的实验研究[J]. 心理科学, 1996(5): 278-281+320.
|
|
[2]
|
徐建乐. 数学试题难度的指标体系及量化[J]. 中学数学教学, 1996(3): 9-12.
|
|
[3]
|
杜明荣. 高中物理试题难度的影响因素研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2008.
|
|
[4]
|
王建磐, 鲍建生. 高中数学教材中例题的综合难度的国际比较[J]. 全球教育展望, 2014, 43(8): 101-110.
|
|
[5]
|
武小鹏, 张怡. 中国和韩国高考数学试题综合难度比较研究[J]. 数学教育学报, 2018, 27(3): 19-24+29.
|
|
[6]
|
李保臻, 石烨. 中国大陆与台湾地区高考数学试题难度比较研究——以2016-2018年大陆全国卷Ⅰ与台湾指考试题为例[J]. 数学教育学报, 2020, 29(1): 58-64.
|
|
[7]
|
宁波市教育考试院. 宁波市2016年初中毕业生学业考试试题解析[EB/OL].
http://nbeea.nbedu.net.cn/school/NeiRead.aspx?id=552, 2017-03-22.
|
|
[8]
|
蔡庆有, 邝孔秀, 宋乃庆. 小学数学教材难度模型研究[J]. 教育学报, 2013, 9(5): 97-105.
|
|
[9]
|
孙佳. 初中生数学问题提出水平及影响因素研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中央民族大学, 2021.
|