“双重刺激法”的理论及应用模型研究
Research on the Theory and Application Model of “Double Stimulation Method”
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2023.1310590, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 吴 刚, 李静君, 赵书欣：上海工程技术大学管理学院，上海；陈 羽：上海工程技术大学继续教育学院，上海
关键词: 双重刺激法；变革能动性；社会文化心理；Double Stimulation Method； Transformative Agency； Social and Cultural Psychology
摘要: “双重刺激法”(double stimulation method)既是一种研究人类心理与行为活动的研究方法，也是一种形成性干预方法。通过对双重刺激法的起源、设计思想基础以及文化社会心理学基础的研究，剖析双重刺激间的动态辩证关系、变革能动性(transformative agency)以及活动系统三个层面的分析单元之间关系，并将其与“双重刺激活动”“形成性干预活动”以及“实践创新活动”融为一体，构建双重刺激法的理论解释模型。继而通过实证研究，进一步拓展维果茨基传统双重刺激应用模型的内涵，重构双重刺激法的应用拓展模型。为人们在面对瞬息万变的世界时，更好地理解意志行为(volitional actions)的形成过程以及如何采用正确的干预措施以改造物质世界等教育问题提供理论及应用指导。
Abstract: The “double stimulation method” is not only a research method to examine human psychology and behavior activities, but also a formative intervention method. Through the research on the origin, philosophical basis, cultural and social psychology of the double stimulation method, this article analyzes the relationship between the three levels of analysis units at the dynamic and dialectic relation between double stimulation, transformative agency and activity system. It is integrated with “double stimulation activities”, “formative intervention activities” and “practical innovation activities” to build a theoretical explanation model of the double stimulation method. Then, through empirical research, the connotation of Vygotsky’s traditional double stimulation application model is further expanded, and the application expansion model of double stimulation method is reconstructed. It provides theoretical and applied guidance for people to better understand the formation process of volitional actions and how to adopt correct intervention measures to transform the material world and other educational issues in the face of a rapidly changing world.
文章引用：吴刚, 李静君, 赵书欣, 陈羽 (2023). “双重刺激法”的理论及应用模型研究. 心理学进展, 13(10), 4682-4696. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2023.1310590

参考文献

[1] R∙基思∙索耶, 主编(2010). 剑桥学习科学手册(徐晓东, 等 译). 教育科学出版社.
[2] 百度百科(2022). 维果茨基. https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E7%BB%B4%E6%9E%9C%E8%8C%A8%E5%9F%BA/6131992
[3] 马颂歌, 等(2022). 革新实验室的原理、案例、模型与教育应用展望——拓展性学习方法论的创新. 远程教育杂志, 40(1), 37-49.
[4] 吴刚(2013). 拓展性学习中形成性干预的研究. 远程教育杂志, 31(2), 49-56.
[5] 吴刚(2022). 工作场所学习与学习变革: 革新实验室的理论及应用研究. 西南大学出版社.
[6] Aagaard, T., & Lund, A. (2020). Digital Agency in Higher Education. Transforming Teaching and Learning. Routledge Focus.[CrossRef] 
[7] Archer, M. (2003). Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge University Press.[CrossRef] 
[8] Brown, A. L. (1992). Design Experiments: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Creating Complex Interventions in Classroom Settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.[CrossRef] 
[9] Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 15-42.[CrossRef] 
[10] Ecclestone, K. (2007). An Identity Crisis? The Importance of Understanding Agency and Identity in Adults’ Learning. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39, 121-131.[CrossRef] 
[11] Emirbayer, M., & Miche, A. (1998). What Is Agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962-1023.[CrossRef] 
[12] Engeström, Y. (2011). From Design Experiments to Formative Interventions. Theory & Psychology, 21, 598-628.[CrossRef] 
[13] Eteläpelto, A. et al. (2013). What Is Agency? Conceptualizing Professional Agency at Work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45-65.[CrossRef] 
[14] Freire, P. (1973). Education for Critical Consciousness. Continuum.
[15] Haapasaari, A., Engeström, Y., & Kerosuo, H. (2014). The Emergence of Learners’ Transformative Agency in a Change Laboratory Intervention. Journal of Education and Work, 29, 232-262.[CrossRef] 
[16] Hays, S. (1994). Structure and Agency and the Sticky Problem of Culture. Sociological Theory, 12, 57-72.[CrossRef] 
[17] Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.[CrossRef] 
[18] Lund, A. et al. (2021). Reprint of: An Analytical Unit of Transformative Agency: Dynamics and dialectics. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 31, Article 100576.[CrossRef] 
[19] Mäkitalo, A. (2016). On the Notion of Agency in Studies of Interaction and Learning. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, 10, 64-67.[CrossRef] 
[20] Mezirov, J. (1981). A Critical Theory of Adult Learning and Education. Adult Education, 32, 3-24.[CrossRef] 
[21] Packer, M. J., & Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and Constructivist Theories of Learning: Ontology, Not Just Epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 35, 227-241.[CrossRef] 
[22] Paloniemi, S., & Collin, K. (2009). Workplace Learning and Work-Related Identity Constructions in a Clinical Setting. In M. P. Caltone (Ed.). Handbook of Lifelong Learning Developments. Education in a Competitive and Globalizing World Series (pp. 141-161). Nova.
[23] Sannino, A. (2015). The Principle of Double Stimulation: A Path to Volitional Action. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 6, 1-15.[CrossRef] 
[24] Sannino, A., & Laitinen, A. (2015). Double Stimulation in the Waiting Experiment: Testing a Vygotskian Model of the Emergence of Volitional Action. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 4, 4-18.[CrossRef] 
[25] Sfard, A. (1998). On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One. Educational Researcher, 27, 4-13.[CrossRef] 
[26] Stasser, G. (1988). Computer Simulation as a Research Tool: The DISCUSS Model of Group Decision Making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 393-422.[CrossRef] 
[27] Stetsenko, A. (2017). The Transformative Mind. Expanding Vygotsky’s Approach to Development and Education. Cambridge University Press.[CrossRef] 
[28] Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0. Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Penguin Random House UK.
[29] Virkkunen, J. (2006). Dilemmas in Building Shared Transformative Agency. Activités Revue Électronique, 3, 43-66.[CrossRef] 
[30] Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Lectures on Psychology, Lecture 6: The Problem of Will and Its Development in Childhood. In R. W. Rieber, & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky. Problems of General Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 351-358). Plenum Press.[CrossRef] 
[31] Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The History of Development of Higher Mental Functions. Chapter 12: Self-Control. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky. The History of the Development of Higher Mental Functions (Vol. 4, pp. 261-281). Plenum.