绘画心理课程对乡村儿童创造力的干预研究
An Intervention Study of Painting Psychology Curriculum on the Creativity of Rural Children
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2023.1310593, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 覃 倩:广西柳州融安县大良镇中心小学,广西 柳州;覃 军*:广西科技师范学院教育科学学院,广西 来宾;钟钊明:广西梧州市广平第二初级中学,广西 梧州
关键词: 创造力儿童绘画心理Creativity Children Painting Psychology
摘要: 目的:探讨绘画心理课程对乡村儿童创造力干预效果。方法:对两个四年级班级乡村儿童进行创造力量表前后测,其中干预组进行10次课绘画心理课程辅导,从创造力的冒险性、好奇性、想象力和挑战性四个维度分析绘画干预效果,对照组不做干预。结果:经过绘画心理课程辅导后,干预组在冒险、好奇、想象三个维度得分达到显著性差异(p < 0.01),其中,男生、女生均在冒险、好奇、想象三个维度得分达到显著性差异,干预组的留守儿童在好奇、想象维度达到显著性差异;对照组在好奇、想象两个维度达到显著性差异(p < 0.01),其中,男生在好奇、想象维度达到显著性差异,女生在好奇维度达到显著性差异,对照组留守儿童在所有维度均无显著性差异。结论:绘画心理课程辅导可以培养农村儿童创造力,尤其是对留守儿童和女生有预测作用。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the impact of a painting psychology course on the creativity of rural children. Methods: Two fourth-grade classes of rural children were tested using a creativity scale before and after the intervention. The intervention group received 10 lessons of painting psychology, and the effect of the intervention was analyzed across four dimensions of creativity: adventure, curiosity, imagination, and challenge. The control group did not receive any intervention. Results: After the painting psychology course, the intervention group showed significant differences in adventure, curiosity, and imagination (p < 0.01). Boys and girls in the intervention group showed significant differences in adventure, curiosity, and imagination, in the intervention group, the left-behind children showed significant differences in curiosity and imagination; The control group showed significant differences in curiosity and imagination (p < 0.01), among which the boys achieved significant differences in curiosity and imagination, the girls achieved significant differences in curiosity, and the left-behind children in the control group achieved no significant differences in all dimensions. Conclusion: The painting psychology course can enhance the creativity of rural children, which was particularly predictive for left-behind children and girls.
文章引用:覃倩, 覃军, 钟钊明 (2023). 绘画心理课程对乡村儿童创造力的干预研究. 心理学进展, 13(10), 4715-4720. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2023.1310593

参考文献

[1] 樊香麟, 苑璞(2020). 绘画疗法对注意缺陷多动障碍儿童干预效果分析. 中国学校卫生, 41(4), 543-550.
[2] 韩琴, 胡卫平, 贾小娟(2013). 同伴互动小组结构对小学生创造性问题提出的影响. 心理科学, 36(2), 417-423.
[3] 简福平, 何仕瑞(2022). 团体绘画艺术疗法对留守儿童社交焦虑的干预研究. 重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版). https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/50.1154.c.20220524.1756.002.html
[4] 林幸台, 王木荣(1997). 威廉斯创造性思考活动手册(p. 17). 心理出版社.
[5] 罗静, 王薇, 高文斌(2009). 中国留守儿童研究述评. 心理科学进展, 17(5), 990-995.
[6] 王梦龙, 等(2007). ADHD儿童在钟表绘画测验中的执行功能特征. 儿童心理卫生, 21(1), 14-16.
[7] 王宁, 刘烟, 等(2018). 团体绘画治疗对青少年抑郁症患者自尊水平及认知功能的影响. 河北医科大学学报, 39(10), 1220-1224.
[8] 王英(2001). 小学儿童认知风格与创造力关系的调查研究. 浙江海洋学院学报(人文科学版), 18(4), 82-85.
[9] 沃建中, 王烨晖, 刘彩梅, 林崇德(2009). 青少年创造力的发展研究. 心理科学, 32(3), 535-539.
[10] 张景焕, 等(2020). 小学高年级学生创造力的发展: 性别差异及学校支持的作用. 心理学报, 52(9), 1057-1070.
[11] Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context: Update to “the Social Psychology of Creativity”. Westview Press.
[12] Camp, G. C. (1994). A Longitudinal Study of Correlates of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 125-144.[CrossRef
[13] Choi, J. N. (2004). Individual and Contextual Predictors of Creative Performance: The Mediating Role of Psychological Processes. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 187-199.[CrossRef
[14] Torrance, E. P., & Myers, R. E. (1970). Creative Learning and Teaching. Dodd, Mead, & Company.