新时代中国药品专利链接制度的变革
China’s Reform of the Pharmaceutical Patent Linkage System in the New Era
摘要: 2020年《专利法修正案》获得通过,基本落实了中国药品专利链接制度创新的设想。在借鉴各国经验的基础上,中国设计并开始实施“药品专利纠纷早期解决机制”。结合现有案例可以发现,该制度的实施依然存在专利信息登记制度不完善、专利声明与挑战制度规范性不足、司法与行政程序衔接度不畅等问题。还需结合制度实施的产业背景,在利益平衡理论的指引下进行细化和完善。尝试从明晰专利信息登记范围和挑战成功要件,细化专利登记与声明程序以及提供统一的纠纷解决途径与有效衔接行政与司法程序入手,以期促进新时代中国药品专利链接制度的建设。
Abstract: In 2020, China amended its Patent Law and implemented a pharmaceutical Patent Linkage System. Learning from the experience of the “Pharmaceutical Patent Linkage System” of various countries, China designed and started to implement the “Early Settlement Mechanism of Pharmaceutical Patent Disputes”. However, it can find that there are still some problems in the implementation of this system when combined with the existing cases, such as the imperfection of the patent information registration system, the lack of standardization of the patent statement and challenging system, the unclear division of labor and the poor connection between judicial and administrative procedures and so on. It is necessary to combine the industrial background, and to refine and improve it under the guidance of the theory of balance of interests. It is recommended to clarify the scope of patent information registration and the elements of “successful challenges”, refine the procedures of patent registration and statement, and provide a unified dispute resolution way to effectively link administrative and judicial procedures so as to promote the construction of pharmaceutical patent linkage system in China in the new era.
文章引用:崔羽纯. 新时代中国药品专利链接制度的变革[J]. 法学, 2023, 11(6): 4751-4758. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJLS.2023.116678

参考文献

[1] 关春媛. 药品专利链接制度的国际发展及本土完善[J]. 中国发明与专利, 2021, 18(6): 52-60.
[2] 李晓秋, 余晨. 论新《专利法》中药品专利链接制度的确立及完善[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2022(1): 131-138+160.
[3] 国家药品监督管理局. 2021年度药品审评报告[EB/OL]. https://www.nmpa.gov.cn/xxgk/fgwj/gzwj/gzwjyp/20220601110541120.html, 2022-09-25.
[4] 2022年创新药回顾: 自主研发与对外授权双轮驱动, 2023年医药创新方向可期[R]. 国金证券, 2023: 1-16.
[5] 2022北京法院知识产权司法保护十大案例[N]. 中国知识产权报数字报, 2023-04-26(016).
[6] 国家知识产权局. 国家知识产权局审结首批药品专利纠纷早期解决机制行政裁决案件[EB/OL]. https://www.cnipa.gov.cn/art/2022/4/25/art_53_175126.html, 2022-11-03.
[7] 胡潇潇. 我国上市药品专利信息登记制度的完善[J]. 政治与法律, 2022(6): 126-142.
[8] 石莉. 撤回专利申请声明和放弃专利权声明的审查之完善[J]. 知识产权, 2016(8): 124-131.
[9] 张飞虎. 专利侵权纠纷救济“双轨制”下行政裁决与司法裁判程序衔接相关问题的探讨[J]. 电子知识产权, 2020(12): 79-86.
[10] 冯晓青. 论利益平衡原理及其在知识产权法中的适用[J]. 江海学刊, 2007(1): 141-146.
[11] 杨燕琳. 印度药品专利强制许可制度的启示[J]. 哈尔滨学院学报, 2016, 37(2): 62-65.
[12] Comanor, W.S. (2021) Why Are (Some) US Drug Prices So High?: The Hatch-Waxman Act Promotes Both Pharmaceutical Innovation and Price Competition, Confounding Simple Comparisons of US and Foreign Drug Prices. Regulation, 44, 18.
[13] 聂琳峰, 刘少军. 药品专利链接制度的解构与重构——兼论《药品专利纠纷早期解决机制实施办法(试行)》[J]. 情报杂志, 2022, 41(9): 199-207.
[14] 冯晓青. 利益平衡论:知识产权法的理论基础[J]. 知识产权, 2003(6): 16-19.
[15] Sturiale, J.E. (2017) Hatch-Waxman Patent Litigation and Inter Partes Review: A New Sort of Competition. Alabama Law Review, 69, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 李想. 我国药品专利链接制度纠纷解决机制的完善与再构[J]. 中国发明与专利, 2022, 19(11): 61-67.
[17] 严垠章. 论我国不服行政裁决民事争议司法审查模式的选择[J]. 温州大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 31(1): 68-73.