少捕慎押下逮捕的程序性控制
Procedural Control of Arrests with Less Arrests and Cautious Detention
DOI: 10.12677/DS.2023.96361, PDF,   
作者: 竺舒园:华东政法大学刑事法学院,上海
关键词: 少捕慎押逮捕程序性控制 Less Arrest and Careful Detention Arrest Procedural Control
摘要: 在少捕慎押的刑事司法政策指导下,我国逮捕率大大降低,但仍存在逮捕条件不合理、逮捕异化、逮捕过程监督乏力等问题,亟需对逮捕制度进行程序性控制。程序性控制是以权力控制理论和正当法律程序为理论基础的,但当前我国逮捕的程序性控制仍存在外部监督流于形式、检察机关地位争议等问题。所以在对逮捕进行程序性控制的过程中需要注意逮捕条件设置、逮捕功能归位、审查逮捕程序等方面的考量,并结合当前新形势,通过建立社会危险性量化考评标准、细化限制前科径行逮捕的适用来完善逮捕条件的设置,通过完善相关救济途径和取保候审等羁押替代措施、优化绩效考核标准使得逮捕功能正确归位以及通过健全羁押听证制度来回应外部监督流于形式的问题,从而落实对逮捕的程序性控制。
Abstract: Under the guidance of the criminal justice policy of less arrest and careful detention, the arrest rate in China has been greatly reduced, but there are still problems such as unreasonable arrest conditions, alienation of arrest, and weak supervision of the arrest process, and there is an urgent need for procedural control of the arrest system. Procedural control is based on the theory of power control and due process of law, but at present, there are still problems in procedural control of arrests in China, such as external supervision and formalities, and disputes over the status of procuratorial organs. Therefore, in the process of procedural control of arrest, it is necessary to pay attention to the considerations of setting arrest conditions, attributing arrest functions, reviewing arrest procedures, etc., and in combination with the current new situation, improve the setting of arrest conditions by establishing quantitative evaluation standards for social danger, refine the application of restrictions on the application of prior arrests, improve the setting of arrest conditions by improving relevant relief channels and alternative detention measures such as release on bail pending trial, optimize performance appraisal standards to correctly return arrest functions, and respond to the problem of external supervision being formalistic by improving the detention hearing system. This enforces procedural control over arrests.
文章引用:竺舒园. 少捕慎押下逮捕的程序性控制[J]. 争议解决, 2023, 9(6): 2638-2646. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2023.96361

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国最高人民检察院. 2023年最高人民检察院工作报告[EB/OL].
https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/gzbg/202303/t20230317_608767.shtml, 2023-03-17.
[2] 高通. 轻罪案件中的逮捕社会危险性条件研究——以故意伤害罪为例[J]. 政法论坛, 2021(2): 85.
[3] 林钰雄. 刑事诉讼法(上册) [M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2005.
[4] 阿克顿. 自由与权力[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2001: 342.
[5] 博登海默. 法理学——法哲学及其方法[M]. 北京: 华夏出版社, 1987: 344.
[6] 谢佑平, 万毅. 刑事侦查制度原理[M]. 北京: 中国人民公安大学出版社, 2003: 290.
[7] 魏晓娜. 刑事正当程序研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国政法大学, 2003.
[8] 郭松. 审查逮捕制度运作中的讯问程序研究——以四个基层检察院的情况为分析素材[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2010(2): 110-111.
[9] 徐美君. 侦查权的运行与控制[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2009: 178.
[10] 张志利, 王晓荣, 张春玲. 逮捕条件中社会危险性的理解与适用[J]. 中国检察官, 2018(21): 42.
[11] 杨燮蛟. 现代犯罪学[M]. 浙江: 浙江大学出版社, 2010: 465.
[12] 杨雄. 刑事强制措施实体化倾向之反思——以预防性羁押为范例[J]. 政法论坛, 2008(4): 151.
[13] 叶惠琴, 张洋, 陈中丁. 未成年人审查逮捕制度运行中的矛盾及其化解——以C市N区检察院为样本[J]. 中国检察官, 2021(6): 61.