刑事诉讼专家辅助人出庭困境及其优化路径
The Dilemma of the Criminal Procedure Expert Assessors in Court and Its Optimization Path
摘要: 专家辅助人出庭制度崭露头角至今,在刑事诉讼活动中平衡控辩双方力量方面起到了积极的促进作用,进一步纠正了司法审判与鉴定活动间错位关系的立法意图。但在我国,由于法律条文的粗疏规定,导致专家辅助人出庭制度在刑事诉讼活动中的普适较低,在实践中出现诉讼地位模糊、资质审查模糊等方面的问题,出庭困境亟待解决。为推进庭审实质化目标顺利实现,形成“二元化”的鉴定意见审查模式,切实发挥专家辅助人出庭的积极作用,本文将从立法完善、资质优化、出庭规范、配套措施到位的路径对我国刑事诉讼专家辅助人出庭制度进行优化完善,提高与我国现有司法制度的匹配度,共同合力发挥其最大效用。
Abstract: Since its emergence, the expert assessor’s court appearance system has played a positive role in balancing the forces of both prosecution and defense in criminal proceedings, and further corrected the legislative intention of the dislocated relationship between judicial trial and expert identification. However, in our country, due to the inadequacy of legal provisions, the system of expert assessors appearing in court has a low universality in criminal proceedings. In practice, there are some problems such as fuzzy litigation status and fuzzy qualification examination, and the dilemma of appearing in court needs to be solved. In order to promote the successful realization of the substantive goal of court hearings, form a “dual” appraisal opinion review mode, and effectively play a positive role in the appearance of expert assessors in court, this paper will optimize and improve the appearance system of expert assistants in criminal litigation in China from the path of perfecting legislation, optimizing qualifications, regulating appearance, and putting in place supporting measures, so as to improve the matching degree with the existing judicial system in China, working together to maximize its effectiveness.
文章引用:贺越. 刑事诉讼专家辅助人出庭困境及其优化路径[J]. 争议解决, 2023, 9(6): 2647-2657. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2023.96362

参考文献

[1] 余依玲. 刑事专家辅助人制度研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 四川省社会科学院, 2018.
[2] 章礼明. 比较法视野中辩方专家辅助人的角色定位[J]. 证据科学, 2022, 30(3): 265-267.
[3] 邓晓霞. 论我国不宜引入英美法系专家证人制度[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2010, 10(1): 15-17.
[4] 李思远. “两元制”专家格局: 专家辅助人制度在我国刑事诉讼中的构建与完善[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2017, 17(2): 10-17.
[5] 崔佳银. 论我国刑事专家辅助人制度的完善[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2022.
[6] [美]阿列克斯∙斯坦. 证据法的根基[M]. 樊传敏, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2018.
[7] 宿博佳. 刑事专家辅助人援助制度的构建[J]. 证据科学, 2022, 30(5): 587-599.
[8] 陈如超. 专家参与刑事司法的多元功能及其体系化[J]. 法学研究, 2020, 42(2): 89-107.
[9] 王思思. 专家辅助人出庭质证规则研究[J]. 证据科学, 2015, 23(2): 248-257.
[10] 赵幼鸣. 从鉴定人出庭制度看专家辅助人的困境[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2013, 13(6): 122-125.
[11] 刘鑫, 王耀民. 论专家辅助人资格的审查[J]. 证据科学, 2014(6): 698-715.
[12] 刘广三, 汪枫. 论我国刑事诉讼专家辅助人制度的完善[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2013(2): 1-5.
[13] 万婕. 比较法视域下刑事诉讼专家证人制度的反思与完善[J]. 学术论坛, 2018, 41(6): 50-51.
[14] 张保生. 中国刑事专家辅助人向专家证人的角色转变[J]. 法学研究, 2020, 42(3): 160-175.
[15] 郭华. 专家辅助人制度的中国模式[M]. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 2014.
[16] 宫万路. 论鉴定人制度的完善[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2002: 15-18.
[17] 韩旭. 刑事诉讼中“有专门知识的人”争议问题的实践反思[J]. 证据科学, 2020, 28(5): 534-545.
[18] 彼得∙巴尼特. 法证科学职业道德: 刑事技术职业标准[M]. 王进喜, 译. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2013.
[19] 冀敏. 专家辅助人制度的构建与完善[J]. 甘肃政法学院学报, 2016, 31(2): 104-117.
[20] Hachtel, H. (2022) Practical Issues of Medical Experts in Assessing Persons With Mental Illness Asking for Assisted Dying in Switzerland. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, Article 909194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] 吴真. 刑事诉讼中专家辅助人出庭的观念、制度和技术再探讨——以林浩森案二审为样本[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2015, 15(4): 8-14.
[22] 李志恒. 刑事诉讼专家辅助人制度实证研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南政法大学, 2015.
[23] 王少仿, 涂丽云, 刘萍. 依法治国背景下司法鉴定救助制度之构建[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2020(4): 9-16.
[24] 张凌燕, 刘妍君. 专家辅助人的执业定位与诉讼规则[J]. 中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 36(4): 59-69.