标准必要专利许可中的不公平高价及反垄断规制
Unfairly High Prices and Antitrust Regulations in SEP Licensing
摘要: 反垄断法在规制标准必要专利许可不公平高价行为发挥着重要作用,合同法与专利法也是不可或缺的。在标准必要专利许可中,专利权人请求的许可费明显超过FRAND原则,可以视为不公平高价,法院或者反垄断执法机构需要在多种计算方法中选择适当的方法确定专利许可费。若专利权人所要求的许可费高于FRAND许可费,需要承担反垄断法上的责任。
Abstract:
Anti monopoly law plays an important role in regulating the unfair and high priced behavior of standard essential patent licensing, and contract law and patent law are also indispensable. In standard essential patent licensing, the license fee requested by the patentee significantly exceeds the FRAND principle, which can be considered as an unfair high price. The court or antitrust enforcement agency needs to choose an appropriate method among various calculation methods to determine the patent license fee. If the patent holder requests a license fee higher than the FRAND license fee, they need to bear the responsibility under antitrust law.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
王晓晔. 论标准必要专利的特殊性[J]. 中国价格监管与反垄断, 2015(10): 20-26.
|
|
[2]
|
王先林. 涉及专利的标准制定和实施中的反垄断问题[J]. 法学家, 2015(4): 62-70.
|
|
[3]
|
宁立志, 龚涛. 标准必要专利许可中的不公平高价及其反垄断规制[J]. 荆楚法学, 2022(5): 94-107.
|
|
[4]
|
郑伦幸. 论FRAND承诺下标准必要专利许可费的确定方法[J]. 法学, 2022(5): 146-158.
|
|
[5]
|
徐家力. 标准必要专利许可费之争——以“高通诉魅族”案为切入点[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2018(1): 166-172.
|