著作专有权利冲突的困惑及思考
Confusion and Thoughts on Conflicts of Exclusive Rights in Works
摘要: 著作人格权制度围绕着著作品与作者人格之间的关系逻辑构建,存在着包涵范围小、无法涵盖各类作品类型的非财产权利缘由的理论缺陷。著作人格权理论尚不足以涵盖辅助著作财产权行使的精神权能范围,也不利于解决著作人身权性质层面的逻辑冲突。本文主要对于著作人身权的性质、著作财产权与人身权于“权利行使”的冲突、财产权与人身权的边界关系等问题进行研究,同时探讨了特殊作品类型的利益冲突,在此基础上,提出了著作人身权利的“辅助权能”属性。“著作权二元制”仅在维护自然人作者专有权利方面是有正面意义,因此,将署名权、发表权、保护作品完整权等权利从“著作权二元制”的框架冲突中解放出来,从实例出发,通过厘清各类侵权行为的受害权利源头,承认著作人身权的辅助权能是解决专有权利行使冲突、边界冲突以及特殊作品类型冲突所面临困境的理性出路。
Abstract: The system of moral rights revolves around the logical construction of the relationship between the author and the personality of the author, and there are theoretical shortcomings in the theory that the scope is small and cannot cover the reasons for nonproperty rights of various types of works. The theory of moral rights is not enough to cover the scope of moral power that assists the exercise of property rights in copyrights, nor is it conducive to resolving the logical conflict between the nature of moral rights. This paper mainly studies the nature of moral rights, the conflict between copyright property rights and personal rights in the “exercise of rights”, the boundary relationship between property rights and personal rights, and discusses the conflict of interest of special works types. Therefore, the rights of authorship, publication, and protection of the integrity of works are liberated from the framework conflict of the “dual copyright system”, starting from examples, by clarifying the source of the victimized rights of various infringements, recognizing the auxiliary rights of moral rights is a rational way out to solve the dilemma faced by conflicts in the exercise of exclusive rights, boundary conflicts and conflicts over special types of works.
文章引用:欧阳琳. 著作专有权利冲突的困惑及思考[J]. 争议解决, 2023, 9(6): 2813-2820. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2023.96383

参考文献

[1] 赵一洲. 论著作财产权权利内容的分割与整合——基于“权利束”与“模块化”理论的考察[J]. 交大法学, 2022(6): 109-123.
[2] 何怀文. 我国著作人身权与著作财产权协调的法律原则[J]. 知识产权, 2015(9): 10-18.
[3] 雷炳德. 著作权法[M]. 张恩民, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2004: 27.
[4] 王坤. 著作人格权制度的反思与重构[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2010, 28(6): 38-46.
[5] 王迁. 知识产权法教程[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2019, 6: 103.
[6] 刘洁. 谈著作人格权与著作权的应然分离[J]. 黑龙江社会科学, 2010(1): 146-149.
[7] 张玲. 保护作品完整权的司法考察及立法建议[J]. 知识产权, 2019(2): 28-43.
[8] 杨延超. 精神权利的困境——两大法系版权立法比较分析[J]. 现代法学, 2007(4): 44-51.
[9] 周晓冰. 著作人格权的保护[M]. 北京: 知识产权出版社, 2015: 16.
[10] 郭卫华, 李晓波, 主编. 中国人身权法律保护判例研究: 上册[M]. 光明日报出版社, 2000: 792.
[11] 何莹. 论版权贸易中精神权利的协调[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南政法大学, 2006.
[12] 郑成思. 版权法[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 1997: 276.
[13] 孙山. 改编权与保护作品完整权之间的冲突及其化解[J]. 科技与出版, 2020(2): 86-90.
[14] 张今. 著作人格权制度的合理性质疑[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2011(4): 66-70.
[15] 马晓明. 论影视作品中改编权与保护作品完整权的冲突和平衡[J]. 中国版权, 2016(1): 43-46.
[16] 梁志文. 著作人格权保护制度的误解与真相[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2011(4): 100-105.
[17] 何炼红. 网络著作人身权研究[J]. 中国法学, 2006(3): 69-82.