破产程序中仲裁司法审查案件管辖问题研究

Study on Jurisdiction in Cases of Judicial Review of Arbitration in Bankruptcy Proceedings

摘要: 破产程序中的仲裁司法审查管辖问题，应当摒弃“全有”或者“全无”的思维，根据《企业破产法》和《仲裁法》的理念不同，对影响管辖的要素进行类型化分析后，思考不同的主体在破产程序中申请撤销或者不予执行仲裁裁决的目的，从实践审视和理论阐释两个维度考察破产管理人、债权人、案外人提起仲裁司法审查时确定管辖的不同解释路径。从解释论的角度缓解破产衍生诉讼管辖制度与仲裁司法审查管辖制度之间的冲突，以做到仲裁司法审查管辖问题上裁判标准的统一，不失为在现行法律框架下的一条折衷路径。

Abstract: The issue of jurisdiction for judicial review of arbitration in bankruptcy proceedings should abandon “all or nothing” thinking. The purpose of different subjects applying for the setting aside or non-enforcement of arbitral awards in bankruptcy proceedings should be contemplated after a typology of the elements affecting jurisdiction analysed in the light of the different concepts of the Enterprise Insolvency Law and the Arbitration Law. Mitigating the conflict between the jurisdictional system of bankruptcy derivative actions and the jurisdictional system of judicial review of arbitration from the perspective of interpretative theory, so as to achieve a uniform standard of adjudication on the issue of jurisdiction of judicial review of arbitration, is a compromise path under the existing legal framework.