低碳试点政策、环保投入与企业绿色创新
Low-Carbon Pilot Policies, Environmental Protection Investment and Green Innovation of Enterprises
摘要: 在“双碳”背景下，企业低碳转型迫在眉睫，低碳试点政策下企业的绿色创新影响低碳城市建设。本文利用2005~2019年沪深A股上市公司企业数据，结合现有文献系统梳理，采用准自然实验法和三重差分法，探讨低碳政策对企业绿色技术创新的影响效应、作用机制和产权异质性。结果表明：1) 低碳试点政策可以在一定程度上缓解企业融资约束，促进企业绿色技术创新。2) 低碳试点政策通过加大环保投入力度，间接促进企业绿色技术创新能力的提升。3) 企业的绿色技术创新主要体现在环保研发投入、节能减排和替代能源生产的转化效率上。试点政策对高能耗产业、非国有企业、绿色产业的促进作用更为显著。本文还为碳达峰、碳中和目标提供了政策理论支持，丰富了宏观政策微观效应的研究成果，为环境政策的评价和调整提供了支持和参考。
Abstract: Under the background of “dual carbon”, the low-carbon transformation of enterprises is imminent, and the green innovation of enterprises under the low-carbon pilot policy affects the construction of low-carbon cities. This paper uses the enterprise data of A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2005 to 2019, combined with the existing literature system, and uses the quasi-natural experimental method and triple difference method to explore the impact effect, mechanism and heterogeneity of property rights of low-carbon policies on enterprises’ green technology innovation. The results show that: 1) The low-carbon pilot policy can alleviate the financing constraints of enterprises to a certain extent and promote the innovation of green technology enterprises. 2) The low-carbon pilot policy indirectly promotes the improvement of enterprises’ green technology innovation capabilities by increasing environmental protection investment. 3) The green technology innovation of enterprises is mainly reflected in environmental protection research and development investment, energy conservation and emission reduction and the conversion efficiency of alternative energy production. The pilot policy has a more significant role in promoting high-carbon industries, non-state-owned enterprises and green industries. This paper also provides policy theoretical support for the goals of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality, enriches the research results of micro effects of macro policies, and provides support and reference for the evaluation and adjustment of environmental policies.
文章引用：宗苏玉. 低碳试点政策、环保投入与企业绿色创新[J]. 低碳经济, 2023, 12(4): 85-102. https://doi.org/10.12677/JLCE.2023.124011

参考文献

[1] Chen, H., Qi, S.Z. and Zhang, J.H. (2022) Towards Carbon Neutrality with Chinese Characteristics: From an Integrated Perspective of Economic Growth-Equity-Environment. Applied Energy, 324, Article ID: 119719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] Zhao, C. and Wang, B. (2021) Does China’s Low-Carbon Pilot Policy Promote Foreign Direct Investment? An Empirical Study Based on City-Level Panel Data of China. Sustain-ability, 13, Article 10848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] 彭璟, 李军, 丁洋. 低碳城市试点政策对环境污染的影响及机制分析[J]. 城市问题, 2020(10): 88-97.
[4] 董梅. 低碳城市试点政策的工业污染物净减排效应——基于合成控制法[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23(5): 16-30.
[5] 蒋伏心, 王竹君, 白俊红. 环境规制对技术创新影响的双重效应——基于江苏制造业动态面板数据的实证研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2013(7): 44-55.
[6] 王书斌, 徐盈之. 环境规制与雾霾脱钩效应——基于企业投资偏好的视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2015(4): 18-30.
[7] 张成, 陆旸, 郭路, 等. 环境规制强度和生产技术进步[J]. 经济研究, 2011, 46(2): 113-124.
[8] 张红凤, 李睿. 低碳试点政策与高污染工业企业绩效[J]. 经济评论, 2022, 234(2): 137-153.
[9] Martin, P.R. and Moser, D.V. (2016) Man-agers’ Green Investment Disclosures and Investors’ Reaction. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61, 239-254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] 高敏. 企业环保投资、技术创新投入对企业价值影响的实证研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2016.
[11] 杨哲. 企业碳排放权的会计确认问题研究[J]. 现代经济信息, 2015(24): 197.
[12] 蔡海静, 周施. 绿色信贷政策与“两高”企业权益资本成本[J]. 财会月刊, 2022(3): 51-60.
[13] 苏冬蔚, 连莉莉. 绿色信贷是否影响重污染企业的投融资行为? [J]. 金融研究, 2018(12): 123-137.
[14] 姚强强. 环境信息披露、绿色技术创新、融资约束——基于重污染企业的实证研究[J/OL]. 经营与管理, 1-14. 2023-08-21.[CrossRef] 
[15] 徐佳, 崔静波. 低碳城市和企业绿色技术创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2020(12): 178-196.
[16] 张伟广, 冯师钰, 韩超. “十一五”约束性污染控制的企业减排效应[J]. 中国环境科学, 2022, 42(11): 5436-5446.
[17] Yao, Y.L. and Shen, X.Y. (2021) Environmental Protec-tion and Economic Efficiency of Low-Carbon Pilot Cities in China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 18143-18166.
[18] 钟昌标, 胡大猛, 黄远浙. 低碳试点政策的绿色创新效应评估——来自中国上市公司数据的实证研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(19): 113-122.
[19] 郭捷, 杨立成. 环境规制、政府研发资助对绿色技术创新的影响——基于中国内地省级层面数据的实证分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(10): 37-44.
[20] 李政, 杨思莹. 财政分权、政府创新偏好与区域创新效率[J]. 管理世界, 2018, 34(12): 29-42, 110, 193-194.
[21] 温忠麟. 张雷, 侯杰泰, 等. 中介效应检验程序及其应用[J]. 心理学报, 2004, 36(5): 614-620.
[22] 虞义华, 郑新业, 张莉. 经济发展水平、产业结构与碳排放强度——中国省级面板数据分析[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2011(3): 72-81.
[23] Yu, Y., Tao, Q. and Du, L. (2017) Carbon Productivity Growth, Technological Innovation, and Technology Gap Change of Coal-Fired Power Plants in China. Energy Policy, 109, 479-487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[24] Yan, Z., Yi, L., Du, K. and Yang, Z.M. (2017) Impacts of Low-Carbon Innovation and Its Heterogeneous Components on CO2 Emissions. Sustainability, 9, Article 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[25] Ghisetti, C. and Quatraro, F. (2017) Green Technologies and Environmen-tal Productivity: A Cross-Sectoral Analysis of Direct and Indirect Effects in Italian Regions. Ecological Economics, 132, 1-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[26] Wang, K., Zhang, J. and Wei, Y.M. (2017) Operational and Environmental Performance in China’s Thermal Power Industry: Taking an Effectiveness Measure as Complement to an Efficiency Measure. Journal of Environmental Management, 192, 254-270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Qiu, S., Wang, Z. and Liu, S. (2021) The Policy Outcomes of Low-Carbon City Construction on Urban Green Development: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment Conducted in China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 66, Article ID: 102699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[28] Lehmann, S. (2013) Low-to-No Carbon City: Lessons from West-ern Urban Projects for the Rapid Transformation of Shanghai. Habitat International, 37, 61-69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐