英语口语学习者在“流利说”中的技术给养感知和认知投入关系探究
Exploring the Relationships between Spoken-English Practitioners’ Technology Affordance Perception and Cognitive Engagement in Using “LAIX”
摘要: 本研究以78名英语口语学习者为研究对象，通过问卷调查的方式探究学习者在移动辅助语言学习条件下的技术给养感知和学习投入现状及其关系。研究发现：1) 学习者的技术给养感知总体表现良好，均超过临界值，但认知投入一般。2) 技术给养感知与认知投入存在不同程度的正相关，认知投入与情感投入之间显著相关。这些发现有助于更深入理解学习者在移动学习环境下的学习行为和态度，丰富学习者的移动辅助学习研究。
Abstract: With 78 English learners as the subjects and through questionnaires, and background data analysis, this study explored the status of their technology affordance perception and cognitive engagement in the mobile environment. It found that: 1) The subjects’ overall performance of technology af-fordance perception was good, which is over critical value, but cognitive engagement is middle; 2) Compared with emotional engagement, technology affordance perception had effects on cognitive engagement. All those are helpful for us to understand learners’ behavior and attitude in mo-bile-assisted language learning and to enrich the.
文章引用：彭丁阳. 英语口语学习者在“流利说”中的技术给养感知和认知投入关系探究[J]. 现代语言学, 2023, 11(11): 4909-4918. https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2023.1111659

参考文献

[1] Liang, J.C., Hwang, G.J., Chen, M.R.A. and Darmawansah, D. (2021) Roles and Research Foci of Artificial Intelligence in Language Education: An Integrated Bibliographic Analysis and Systematic Review Approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 31, 4270-4296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] Almaiah, M.A., Alfaisal, R., Salloum, S.A., Hajjej, F., Shishakly, R., Lutfi, A. and Al-Maroof, R.S. (2022) Measuring Institutions’ Adoption of Arti-ficial Intelligence Applications in Online Learning Environments: Integrating the Innovation Diffusion Theory with Technology Adoption Rate. Electronics, 11, Article No. 3291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] Pérez-Paredes, P., Guillamón, C.O., Van de Vyver, J., Meurice, A., Jiménez, P.A., Conole, G. and Hernández, P.S. (2019) Mobile Data-Driven Language Learning: Affordances and Learners’ Perception. System, 84, 145-159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] Thomas, M. and Evans, M. (2014) Guest Editorial. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27, 107-108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] McNeil, L. (2014) Ecological Affordance and Anxiety in an Oral Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Environment. Language Learning & Technology, 18, 142-159.
[6] Aronin, L. and Singleton, D. (2010) Affordances and the Diversity of Multilingualism. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 205, 105-129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] Pegrum, M. (2016) Language and Literacies for Digital Lives. In: Martın-Monje, E., Elorza, I. and Garcıa Riaza, B., Eds., Technology-Enhanced Language Learning for Specialized Domains: Practical Applications and Mobility, Routledge, Abingdon, 9-22.
[8] Stockwell, G. and Hubbard, P. (2013) Some Emerging Principles for Mobile-Assisted Language Learning. The International Research Foundation for English Language Education, Monterey, 1-15.
[9] Gibson, J.J. (1977) The Theory of Affordances. In: Shaw, R. and Bransford, J., Eds., Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology, Erlbaum, Hills-dale, 67-82.
[10] Gibson, J. (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
[11] 黄景, 龙娜娜, 滕锋. 给养与外语教育[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2018(1): 39-52+147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] Mettler, T. and Wulf, J. (2019) Physiolytics at the Workplace: Affordances and Constraints of Wearables Use from an Employee’s Perspective. Information Systems Journal, 29, 245-273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] Gaver, W.W. (1991) Technology Affordances. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New Orleans, 27 April-2 May 1991, 79-84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] Leonardi, P.M. (2011) Innovation Blindness: Culture, Frames, and Cross-Boundary Problem Construction in the Development of New Technology Concepts. Organization Science, 22, 347-369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] Parchoma, G. (2014) The Contested Ontology of Af-fordances: Implications for Researching Technological Affordances for Collaborative Knowledge Production. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 360-368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Oliver, M. (2013) Learning Technology: Theorising the Tools We Study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 31-43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Leonardi, P.M. (2011) When Flexible Routines Meet Flex-ible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35, 147-167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] Gromik, N. (2012) Cell Phone Video Recording Feature as a Language Learning Tool: A Case Study. Computers & Education, 58, 223-230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[19] Darhower, M.A. (2008) The Role of Linguistic Affordances in Telecollaborative Chat. CALICO Journal, 26, 48-69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[20] Willis, J., Davis, K. and Chaplin, S. (2013) Sociocultural Affordances of Online Peer Engagement. Journal of Learning Design, 6, 34-45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[21] Mavrikis, M., Noss, R., Hoyles, C. and Geraniou, E. (2012) Sowing the Seeds of Algebraic Generalization: Designing Epistemic Affordances for an Intelligent Microworld. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 68-84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[22] Limperos, A.M., Buckner, M.M., Kaufmann, R. and Frisby, B.N. (2015) Online Teaching and Technological Affordances: An Experimental Investigation into the Impact of Modality and Clarity on Perceived and Actual Learning. Computers & Education, 83, 1-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[23] Weidlich, J. and Bastiaens, T.J. (2019) Designing Sociable Online Learning Environments and Enhancing Social Presence: An Affordance Enrichment Approach. Computers & Education, 142, Article ID: 103622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[24] Levy, M. (1997) Computer Assisted Language Learning: Context and Conceptualization. Pergamon Press, Oxford. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[25] Godwin-Jones, R. (2011) Mobile Apps for Language Learning. Language Learning & Technology, 15, 2-11.
[26] Zammuto, R.F., Griffith, T.L., Majchrzak, A., Dougherty, D.J. and Faraj, S. (2007) Information Technology and the Fabric of Organization. Organization Science, 18, 749-762.
[27] Majchrzak, A., Markus, M.L. and Wareham, J. (2016) Designing for Digital Transformation. MIS Quar-terly, 40, 267-278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[28] 张娜. 国内外学习投入及其学校影响因素研究综述[J]. 心理研究, 2012, 5(2): 83-92.
[29] Revere, L. and Kovach, J.V. (2011) Online Technologies for Engaged Learning a Meaningful Synthesis for Educators. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12, 113-124.
[30] Zimmerman, B.J. (1990) Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[31] Yu, Z., Yu, L., Xu, Q., Xu, W. and Wu, P. (2022) Effects of Mobile Learning Technologies and Social Media Tools on Student Engagement and Learning Outcomes of English Learning. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 31, 381-398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[32] Hutchby, I. (2001) Technologies, Texts and Affordances. Sociology, 35, 441-456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[33] Gabarre, C., Gabarre, S., Din, R., Shah, P. and Karim, A.A. (2016) Scaffolding Engagement in the Immersive t-MALL Classroom. Creative Education, 7, 349-363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[34] Chang, M.-M. (2005) Applying Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in a Web-Based Instruction—An Investigation of Motivation Perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18, 217-230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[35] Baldock, B.L., Fernandez, A.L., Franco, J., Provencher, B.A. and McCoy, M.R. (2021) Overcoming the Challenges of Remote Instruction: Using Mobile Technology to Promote Ac-tive Learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 98, 833-842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[36] Butler, A., Camilleri, M., Creed, A. and Zutshi, A. (2021) The Use of Mobile Learning Technologies for Corporate Training and Development: A Contextual Framework. In: Camilleri, M.A., Ed., Strategic Corporate Communication in the Digital Age, Emerald, Bingley, 115-130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[37] Chu, H.C. (2014) Potential Negative Effects of Mobile Learning on Students’ Learning Achievement and Cognitive Load—A Format Assessment Perspective. Educational Technology & Society, 17, 332-344.
[38] Kalyuga, S. (2009) Cognitive Load Theory. In: Kalyuga, S., Ed., Managing Cognitive Load in Adaptive Multimedia Learning, Information Science Reference, Hershey, 34-57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[39] Blin, F., Nocchi, S. and Fowley, C. (2013) Mondes virtuels et ap-prentissage des langues: Vers un cadre théorique émergent. Recherches et Applications, 54, 94-107.
[40] Chung, C.J., Hwang, G.J. and Lai, C.L. (2019) A Review of Experimental Mobile Learning Research in 2010-2016 Based on the Ac-tivity Theory Framework. Computers & Education, 129, 1-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[41] Kahn, W.A. (1990) Psychological Conditions of Personal En-gagement and Disengagement at Work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692-724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[42] 蔡晨. 移动环境下给养感知与英语学习投入的关系研究[J]. 外语界, 2021(6): 63-71.