秀山县2023年褐飞虱大发生特点及原因分析
Outbreak Characteristics and Causes of Brown Planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens 2023, in Xiushan County
摘要: 褐飞虱是秀山县水稻生长后期稻飞虱优势种群,2023年秀山县褐飞虱大发生。本文分析秀山县褐飞虱大发生的特点表现为灯诱始见期偏迟、虫量偏低;灯诱虫量大;秧田虫量低;水稻本田虫量暴发性增长;预测圃虫量前期偏低,后期激增;本田主害期明显等。从地形地貌、气候、管理水平等方面分析褐飞虱大发生原因,并对褐飞虱防控提出建议。
Abstract: The Brown Planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens) is the dominant population of rice planthopper at the late growth stage in Xiushan County. Nilaparvata lugens is a major 2023 in Xiushan County. The characteristics of the outbreak of brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens) in Xiushan County were as follows: late starting stage and low insect quantity; high insect quantity induced by lamp; low in-sect quantity in rice seedling field; explosive increase of insect quantity in rice field; low prestage of prediction of insect quantity in rice nursery; In the later period, the number of crops increased sharply, and the main damage period of Honda was obvious. The reasons for the occurrence of brown planthopper were analyzed from the aspects of landform, climate and management level, and some suggestions for the control of brown planthopper were put forward.
文章引用:肖晓华, 黄修冬, 杨昌洪, 黄秀平. 秀山县2023年褐飞虱大发生特点及原因分析[J]. 农业科学, 2023, 13(11): 1057-1061. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJAS.2023.1311144

参考文献

[1] 全国农业技术推广服务中心编著. 农作物有害生物测报技术手册[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006: 130-136.
[2] 肖晓华. 稻飞虱发生的监测、预报及综合防治[J]. 植物医生, 2007, 20(4): 33-35.
[3] 肖晓华. 稻飞虱测报工作实践与探索[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2009, 29(4): 8-10.
[4] 肖晓华, 谢雪梅, 刘春, 卢福刚. 武陵山区秀山县稻飞虱发生的演变[J]. 现代农业科学, 2008, 15(2): 36-39.
[5] 肖晓华, 贾琏, 杨昌洪, 黄秀平. 重庆市秀山县稻飞虱发生特点及原因分析[J]. 植物医学, 2022, 1(4): 6-72.
[6] 肖晓华, 刘春, 吴洪华, 等. 水稻主栽品种对稻飞虱抗性鉴定试验[J]. 植物医生, 2012, 25(1): 26-29.
[7] 肖晓华, 刘春, 吴洪华, 等. 水稻主栽品种稻飞虱为害损失测定[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2011, 471(3): 54-58.
[8] 王彦华, 沈晋良, 王鸣华. 褐飞虱抗药性机理及其治理研究进展[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2005, 26(4): 24-28.
[9] 喻永忠, 柳辉林, 黄瑛, 等. 10%三氟苯嘧啶SC对水稻稻飞虱的防治效果[J]. 生物灾害科学, 2019, 42(3): 215-217.
[10] 方雪勇, 赵敏, 陈佳蕾, 等. 不同药剂组合对稻飞虱和稻纵卷叶螟的防效及安全性[J]. 湖北植保, 2023(1): 26-29.