论合伙型私募基金有限合伙人退伙财产请求权的实现
On the Right of Limited Partners to Withdraw Property in Partnership Private Equity Funds
摘要: 合伙型私募基金的兴起为金融市场的发展注入了新的活力,能够较好地解决小微高新技术企业融资难的问题。但由于合伙型私募基金是合伙企业与私募基金的集合体,受《证券投资基金法》与《合伙企业法》的双重规制,司法实践中对于有限合伙人即投资者退伙财产请求权问题上出现了较大分歧。对于该类纠纷,应当明确合伙型私募基金为披着有限合伙企业外衣的私募基金,因此在两部法律适用上应当优先适用《证券投资基金法》,优先考虑其禁止私募基金刚性兑付等规定,将投资者在基金正常运行期间内退伙请求和退还本金和利息的请求予以驳回。同时,为了保护私募基金投资者,应当严格落实合格投资者制度,把握好金融监管的尺度,既能充分发挥金融创新力,激发金融市场活力,又能规范引导金融市场平稳健康运行。
Abstract: The rise of partnership private equity funds has injected great vitality for the development of the financial market, which can effectively solve the problem of financing difficulties for small and micro high-tech enterprises. However, due to the fact that partnership private equity funds are a combination of partnership enterprises and private equity funds, and are governed by the dual regulations of the Securities Investment Fund Law and the Partnership Enterprise Law, there have been significant different views in judicial practice regarding the issue of limited partners, i.e. investors’ right to withdraw from the partnership property. For such disputes, it should be clarified that partnership type private equity funds are private equity funds dressed in the guise of limited partnership enterprises. Therefore, in the application of the two laws, priority should be given to the Securities Investment Fund Law, which prohibits rigid redemption of private equity funds, and other provisions. Investors’ requests for withdrawal and return of principal and interest during the normal operation of the fund should be rejected. At the same time, in order to protect private equity fund investors, it is necessary to strictly implement the qualified investor system, grasp the scale of financial supervision, fully leverage financial innovation, stimulate financial market vitality, and regulate and guide the smooth and healthy operation of the financial market.
文章引用:黄若煊. 论合伙型私募基金有限合伙人退伙财产请求权的实现[J]. 法学, 2023, 11(6): 5533-5539. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJLS.2023.116790

参考文献

[1] 刘俊海. 论合伙型私募基金有限合伙人的退伙财产请求权——合伙企业法和投资基金法的不同维度[J]. 政治与法律, 2021(6): 80-96.
[2] 赵玉. 民法典背景下合伙企业财产制度构造[J]. 中国法学, 2020(6): 103-121.
[3] 肖宇. 股权投资基金治理机制研究——以有限合伙制基金为中心[J]. 社会科学研究, 2010(3): 86-91.
[4] 秦杰. 私募股权投资者的法律保护[D]: [博士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南政法大学, 2019: 12-81.
[5] 徐子良. 委托理财案件法律适用难点辨析——以保底条款负外部性分析及其无效后果处理为重点[J]. 法律适用, 2011(1): 53-61.
[6] 梁清华. 论我国合格投资者法律制度的完善——从法定条件到操作标准[J]. 证券市场导报, 2015(2): 72-78.
[7] 陈安悦, 董晓艾, 蔡杉耸. 我国私募股权众筹融资的法律风险防范制度研究[J]. 中国市场, 2017(7): 39-41.
[8] 钱力, 叶继林. 反思与启示: 对有限合伙私募基金的有限合伙人权利保护制度的检视[J]. 湖南大学学报, 2017(1): 157-160.
[9] 黄志凌. 金融监管的作用、定位与改革方向[J]. 金融监管研究, 2017(10): 1-12.
[10] 夏小雄. “得形”、“忘意”与“返本”: 中国信托法的理念调整和制度转型[J]. 河北法学, 2016 (6): 79-94.
[11] 郑联盛. 金融创新、金融稳定的历史回望与当下风险管控[J]. 财政金融, 2014(8): 81-89.