斯蒂格勒哲学视角下的古代技术问题分析
The Analysis of Problem of Ancient Technology from the Perspect of Stiegler’ Philosophy
DOI: 10.12677/ACPP.2023.1211366, PDF,   
作者: 马羞然：西安建筑科技大学，工程技术与社会研究所，陕西 西安
关键词: 技术；斯蒂格勒；海德格尔；亚里士多德；Technology； Stiegler； Heidegger； Aristotle
摘要: 现代科学技术的发展同时滋养了对技术的反思和质询。技术哲学在近年以来的发展引发了对古代技术思想缺失的追问。古代哲学为现代文明的诸多领域提供了基本范式，而唯独技术消失在古代人的视线中。反思这一问题一方面有助于我们重新思考古代技术的基本问题；另一方面，为我们把握古代和现代技术的全貌以此来反思现代科技有重大意义。因此本文打算从现代技术哲学的视角入手，勾勒出现代技术的理念，并在这个基础上思考现代技术理论的一些困境。然后考察斯蒂格勒技术哲学的贡献。他的技术思考是如何超越了以往的理论并为我们探寻古代技术提供了一个视阈。我们会发现古代技术思想的缺失实则是一个伪问题。原因在于以往学界热衷于从制作概念来考察，而忽视了实践概念与技术哲学的关系。最后我们将论证实践是理解古代技术问题的入口，它能对接现代技术哲学的基本范式。
Abstract: The development of modern science and technology has also nurtured reflection and questioning of technology. The development of technological philosophy in recent years has led to questioning the lack of ancient technological ideas. Ancient philosophy provided basic paradigms for many fields of modern civilization, but technology alone disappeared from the sight of ancient people. Reflecting on this issue can help us rethink the fundamental issues of ancient technology; On the other hand, it is of great significance for us to grasp the complete picture of ancient and modern technology in or-der to reflect on modern technology. Therefore, this article intends to start from the perspective of modern technological philosophy, outline the concept of modern technology and on this basis, con-sider some difficulties in modern technological theory. Then examine the contribution of Stigler’s philosophy of technology. His technological thinking has transcended past theories and provided us with a perspective to explore ancient technology. We will find that the lack of ancient technological ideas is actually a pseudo problem. The reason is that in the past, the academic community was en-thusiastic about examining the concept of production, while neglecting the relationship between practical concepts and technological philosophy. Finally, we will argue that practice is the entrance to understanding ancient technological issues, and it can connect with the basic paradigm of mod-ern technological philosophy.
文章引用：马羞然. 斯蒂格勒哲学视角下的古代技术问题分析[J]. 哲学进展, 2023, 12(11): 2228-2235. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACPP.2023.1211366

参考文献

[1] 吴国盛. 技术哲学讲演录[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2016: 124-142.
[2] (美)卡尔∙米切姆. 技术哲学概论[M]. 殷登祥, 曹南燕, 等, 译. 天津: 天津科学技术出版社, 1999: 17.
[3] Rae, G. (2012) Being and Technology: Heidegger on the Overcoming of Metaphysics. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 43, 305-325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] (德)海德格尔. 演讲与论文集[M]. 孙周兴, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2020: 22-24.
[5] Riis, S. (2011) Towards the Origin of Technology: Reconfiguring Martin Heidegger’s Thinking. Continental Philosophy Review, 44, 103-117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Simondon, G. (1989) Du Mode d’existence des Objets Techniques. Aubier, imprimé en France.
[7] (法)贝尔纳∙斯蒂格勒. 技术与时间:爱比米修斯的失误[M]. 裴程, 译. 南京: 译林出版社, 2015: 110-115.
[8] Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1975) Le Gesture et Le Parole. Paris Rue Huyghens, 32, 173-174.
[9] 陈明宽. 技术替补与广义器官: 斯蒂格勒哲学研究[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2021: 71.
[10] 张艳. “个体化”和关系性思考——西蒙栋对“技术物体”概念的重构及其在数码技术分析中的应用[J]. 科学技术哲学研究, 2019, 36(5): 74-79.
[11] Simondon, G. (1989) L’individuation Psychioue et Collective. A la lumiere des notions de Forme, Information, Potentiel et Metastabilite, Aubier, imprimé en France. 12 p.
[12] (法)吉尔∙德勒兹著. 差异与重复[M]. 安靖, 张子岳, 译. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2019: 414-416.
[13] Scott, D. (2014) Gilbert Simondon’s Psychic and Collective Individuation: A Critical Introduction and Guide. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 31-32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] Hesiod (2006) Theogony. Works and Days. Testimonia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 110-114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] Arendt, H. (1998) The Human Condition. The University of Chicago Press, London, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Plato (2012) Plato Werke in Acht Banden Griechisch Und Deutsch (Zweiter Band), Herausgegeben Von Gunther Eigler, Wissenschaftliche Buchges, Ber-lin.
[17] Plato (1970) The Republic. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 444-445.
[18] Jean-Pierre, V. (1988) Mythe et pensée chez les Grecs: Études de psychologie historique. éditions la découverte, Paris, 295-301.
[19] Ross, W.D. (1957) Aristotelis Politica. Oxford University Press, Oxford. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[20] (瑞士)雅各布∙布克哈特. 希腊人和希腊文明[M]. 王大庆, 译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2017: 258.
[21] Aristotle (1934) The Nicomachean Ethnic. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
[22] Connell, S.M. (2021) The Cambridge Conpanion to Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 117-121.
[23] Agamben, G. (1998) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford University Press, Redwood City.
[24] (美)唐∙伊德. 让事物“说话”: 后现象学与技术科学[M]. 韩连庆, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2008: 58.
[25] Stiegler, B. (2018) La technique et le temps: 1. La Faute d’Epiméthée—2.La Désorienta-tion—3.Le Temps du cinéma et la question du mal-etre, suivis de Le nouveau conflit des facultes et des fonctions dans I’Anthropocene, Fayard, Paris, 168 p.
[26] Naddaf, G. (2005) The Greek Concept of Nature. State University of New York Press, New York, 83-84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐