商业秘密保护的刑民协调问题研究

Study on the Criminal-Civil Coordination in the Protection of Trade Secrets

摘要: 《反不正当竞争法》和《刑法》虽然不断更新，对商业秘密作出了更加细致的保护，但是并没有妥善解决商业秘密保护刑民两种程序衔接的问题。以往侵犯商业秘密案件司法实践中，法院普遍机械地根据“先刑后民”原则对案件进行审理，造成两种程序的衔接不畅，产生诸多实体问题。侵犯商业秘密案件有着固有的逻辑判断顺序，从经济纠纷案件中诞生的“先刑后民”模式应用到商业秘密案件中有着本质上缺陷。为了解决这样的缺陷，将“先民后刑”模式适用到商业秘密刑民交叉案件中，会有更佳的效果，也能填补三审合一缺失的空间，以完善对商业秘密的保护。

Abstract: Although the Anti-Unfair Competition Law and the Criminal Law have been continuously updated to provide more detailed protection for trade secrets, they have not properly resolved the problem of linking the criminal and civil procedures for the protection of trade secrets. In the past infringement of trade secrets in judicial practice, the court generally mechanical according to the principle of “first criminal and then civil” on the case, resulting in the two procedures of the interface is not smooth, resulting in a number of entity problems. Infringement of trade secret cases have inherent logical judgment order, from economic disputes born in the “criminal before civil” mode applied to trade secret cases have inherent defects. In order to solve such defects, the “civil before criminal” mode applied to trade secrets criminal-civil cross-case, will have better results, but also fill the missing space of the three trials, in order to improve the protection of trade secrets.