催收非法债务罪的司法适用限缩研究
Research on the Limitation of Judicial Application of the Crime of Collecting Illegal Debts
摘要: 催收非法债务罪是近两年才设立的新罪名,但是其在司法实务中逐渐出现了不合理的扩张适用现象,本文通过准确把握和限定催收非法债务罪的非法债务范围,可知如果是违法犯罪行为生成的债务,应当属于非法债务。基于不法原由产生的如买卖违禁物品、吸毒、赌博等债务,也应当全部属于非法债务的范围之内;其次对本罪催收行为的内涵深入挖掘,明晰该罪的入罪手段,防止仅根据催收行为的形式符合性而作有罪化认定;“情节严重”是该罪的法定构成要件,必须存在由于催收非法债务导致的侵害法益的事实,防止将没有侵害法益的事实行为认定为“情节严重”。
Abstract:
The crime of collecting illegal debts is a new crime that was only established in the past two years. However, in judicial practice, it has gradually seen unreasonable expansion and application. This article accurately grasps and limits the scope of illegal debts in the crime of collecting illegal debts. It can be seen that if it is illegal Debts generated by criminal acts should be illegal debts. Debts arising from illegal reasons, such as the purchase and sale of prohibited items, drug abuse, gambling, etc., should also all fall within the scope of illegal debts; secondly, dig deeper into the connotation of collection behavior of this crime, clarify the means of incriminating this crime, and prevent the collection behavior from being based solely on the crime must be determined based on the formal compliance; “serious circumstances” are the statutory elements of the crime, and there must be facts that infringe legal interests due to the collection of illegal debts to prevent acts that do not infringe legal interests from being determined as “serious circumstances”.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
韩康, 裴长利. 论“催收非法债务罪”中“高利贷”的认定标准[J]. 理论界, 2021(9): 44-49.
|
|
[2]
|
李永军. 论自然之债在我国民法典体系中的地位[J]. 比较法研究, 2017(1): 1-17.
|
|
[3]
|
周光权. 刑事立法进展与司法展望: 《(刑法修正案(十一)》总置评[J]. 法学, 2021(1): 18-35.
|
|
[4]
|
张明楷. 刑法学[M]. 第6版. 北京: 法律出版社, 2021: 1405.
|
|
[5]
|
吴情树. 催收非法债务罪研究[J]. 法治现代化研究, 2021(5): 89-101.
|
|
[6]
|
张平寿. 催收非法债务罪的限缩适用与路径选择[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2022(1): 158-176.
|
|
[7]
|
劳东燕. 刑法修正案(十一)条文要义[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2021: 252.
|
|
[8]
|
陈洪兵. “情节严重”司法解释的纰缪及规范性重构[J]. 东方法学, 2019(4): 87-100.
|