在相互无偏基下基于Hellinger距离的相干性
Coherence Based on Hellinger Distance under Mutually Unbiased Basis
DOI: 10.12677/AAM.2023.1211471, PDF,   
作者: 李学强:南昌航空大学数学与信息科学学院,江西 南昌
关键词: 量子相干相互无偏基Hellinger距离Bell对角态Quantum Coherence Mutually Unbiased Bases Hellinger Distance Bell-Diagonal States
摘要: 本文研究了在相互无偏基下量子态的基于Hellinger距离的量子相干性,从中推导出在相互无偏基中对于三维X态存在不同的标准正交基下有相同的基于Hellinger距离的量子相干性。之后我们提出Bell对角态在三组“相互无偏的自张量基(autotensor of mutually unbiased basis (AMUB))”下的基于Hellinger距离的量子相干性,并且这三个相干值可以对f(x1,x2,x3)中的未知数相互置换从而分别表示出来。我们还发现在四维Hilbert空间中的相互无偏基除AMUB外剩余两组基下Bell对角态的基于Hellinger距离的量子相干性是相同的。
Abstract: In this paper, we study the quantum coherence of quantum states based on Hellinger distance un-der mutually unbiased bases. We derive that there is the same quantum coherence based on Hellinger distance under different standard orthogonal bases for the three-dimensional X state in mutually unbiased bases. We propose the quantum coherence of Bell diagonal states based on Hellinger distance under three sets of “autotensor of mutually unbiased basis (AMUB)”, and these three coherence values can be permutated with each other to represent the unknowns in f(x1,x2,x3) . We also find that the quantum coherence of Bell-diagonal states based on Hellinger distance is the same under the two sets of mutually unbiased bases except AMUB in the four-di- mensional Hilbert space.
文章引用:李学强. 在相互无偏基下基于Hellinger距离的相干性[J]. 应用数学进展, 2023, 12(11): 4782-4788. https://doi.org/10.12677/AAM.2023.1211471

参考文献

[1] Glauber, R.J. (1963) Coherent and Incoherent States of the Radiation Field. Physical Review, 131, Article 2766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S. and Maccone, L. (2004) Quan-tum-Enhanced Measurements: Beating the Standard Quantum limit. Science, 306, 1330-1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Bagan, E., Bergou, J.A., Cottrell, S.S. and Hillery, M. (2016) Rela-tions between Coherence and Path Information. Physical Review Letters, 116, Article 160406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Heinrich, A.J., Oliver, W.D., Vandersypen, L.M., Ardavan, A., Sessoli, R., Loss, D. and Morello, A. (2021) Quantum-Coherent Nanoscience. Nature Nanotechnology, 16, 1318-1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Baumgratz, T., Cramer, M. and Plenio, M.B. (2014) Quantifying Coherence. Physical Review Letters, 113, Article 140401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Shao, L.H., Xi, Z., Fan, H. and Li, Y. (2015) Fidelity and Trace-Norm Distances for Quantifying Coherence. Physical Review A, 91, Article 042120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Rastegin, A.E. (2002) Relative Error of State-Dependent Clon-ing. Physical Review A, 66, Article 042304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Jin, Z.X. and Fei, S.M. (2018) Quantifying Quantum Coher-ence and Nonclassical Correlation Based on Hellinger Distance. Physical Review A, 97, Article 062342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Ma, J., Yadin, B., Girolami, D., Vedral, V. and Gu, M. (2016) Converting Coherence to Quantum Correlations. Physical Review Letters, 116, Article 160407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Wootters, W.K. and Fields, B.D. (1989) Optimal State-Determination by Mutually Unbiased Measurements. Annals of Physics, 191, 363-381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Ryan-Anderson, C., Bohnet, J.G., Lee, K., Gresh, D., Hankin, A., Gaebler, J.P. and Stutz, R.P. (2021) Realization of Real-Time Fault-Tolerant Quantum Error Correction. Physical Re-view X, 11, Article 041058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] D’Ariano, G.M., Paris, M.G. and Sacchi, M.F. (2003) Quan-tum Tomography. Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics, 128, 206-309.
[13] Spengler, C., Huber, M., Brierley, S., Adaktylos, T. and Hiesmayr, B.C. (2012) Entanglement Detection via Mutually Unbiased Bases. Physical Review A, 86, Article 022311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Yuan, Y., Huang, X., Niu, Y. and Gong, S. (2023) Optimal Estimation of Quantum Coherence by Bell State Measurement: A Case Study. Entropy, 25, Article 1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Wang, Y.K., Ge, L.Z. and Tao, Y.H. (2019) Quantum Coherence in Mutu-ally Unbiased Bases. Quantum Information Processing, 18, Article No. 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef