慎诉背景下“帮信罪”不起诉适用之检视——以416份不起诉决定书为样本

Review on the Application of Non-Prosecution for the Crime of Helping Trust under the Background of Careful Prosecution—Taking 416 Non-Prosecution Decisions as Samples

摘要: 帮信罪在长期休眠状态后，随着断卡行动呈现出“井喷”式增长的样态。对帮信罪适用不起诉决定，在提高司法效率，节约司法资源的同时，也贯彻了慎诉的刑事司法政策。通过对416份帮信罪不起诉决定书进行分析，发现法定不起诉中对于“情节显著轻微”认定存在争议，存疑不起诉中“明知”取证困难，相对不起诉中适用条件也存在争议。对此应对帮信罪入罪标准进行细化把握，明确帮信罪“明知”的推定规则，统一相对不起诉的适用标准，规范不起诉的适用。合理使用不起诉制度解决帮信罪在实践中过度应用的问题，保证该罪发挥其立法目的的同时，为正确适用该罪提供参考。

Abstract: After a long dormant state, the crime of helping trust shows a “blowout” growth with the action of breaking cards. The decision of non-prosecution for the crime of helping trust not only improves judicial efficiency and saves judicial resources, but also implements the criminal judicial policy of careful prosecution. Through the analysis of 416 non-prosecution decisions for the crime of helping trust, it is found that there are disputes about the determination of “significant and minor circumstances” in the statutory non-prosecution, “knowing” the difficulty of obtaining evidence in the doubtful non-prosecution, and there are also disputes about the applicable conditions in the relative non-prosecution. Therefore, the criteria for the crime of helping trust should be clarified, the presumed rules of “knowing” for the crime of helping trust should be clarified, the applicable standards of relative non-prosecution should be unified, and the application of non-prosecution should be standardized. The fair use non-prosecution system solves the problem of excessive application of the crime of helping trust in practice, ensures that the crime plays its legislative purpose, and provides reference for the correct application of the crime.