论算法解释权的正当性与制度建构

On the Legitimacy and Institutional Construction of Algorithm Interpretation Right

摘要: 算法“效率优先”的价值取向与现代社会自由、平等精神相抵触，消解了人的主体性，与人的诸多基本权利相冲突。基于边沁的功利主义理论和利益平衡原理，法律对算法的规制是必要且正当的。美国、欧盟对算法解释权的立法进程，对我国算法规制的完善有所裨益。我国算法规制的建构，应立足本国国情，加强行业自律监管，对算法解释权的具体制度作出更进一步的规范指引，为算法的继续发展提供坚实的法律保障。

Abstract: The value orientation of “efficiency first” in algorithms contradicts the spirit of freedom and equality in modern society, dispels human subjectivity, and conflicts with many basic rights of human beings. Based on Bentham’s utilitarianism theory and interest balance principle, it is necessary and legitimate to regulate algorithms. The legislative process of the algorithm interpretation right in the United States and the European Union is helpful to the improvement of the algorithm regulation in China. The construction of algorithm regulation in our country should be based on the actual conditions of our nation. The self-discipline supervision of the industry should be strengthened, and further normative guidance for the specific system of algorithm interpretation right should be made, so as to provide solid legal guarantee for the continued development of algorithm.