认罪认罚案件中被追诉人反悔上诉问题实证研究

An Empirical Study on the Issue of Penitent Appeal in Guilty Plea Cases

摘要: 我国现行刑事诉讼制度中并没有明确规定被追诉人反悔权，但反悔权的样态存在于认罪认罚从宽制度中。确保被追诉人认罪认罚自愿性必然要求赋予其反悔权，实现认罪认罚制度改革目标首先要求提高诉讼效率。应当明确，在认罪认罚案件中，即便保障被追诉人反悔权对提高诉讼效率有负面影响，但反悔权是被追诉人不可剥夺的基本救济权利，法律必须明确赋予被追诉人反悔权。鉴于二者存在矛盾，本文结合司法实践中出现的40件判例，从实证研究的角度出发，司法机关层面提出二审法院引入互联网 + 上诉理由前置审查会议，被追诉人层面提出拓宽被追诉人认罪认罚协商空间，以期使矛盾双方达到适当平衡的效果。

Abstract: The present criminal procedure system of our country does not clearly stipulate the right of repentance of the accused, but the form of the right of repentance exists in the system of leniency of guilty plea. To ensure the voluntariness of guilty plea of the accused, it is necessary to give them the right of repentance, and to achieve the reform goal of guilty plea system, it is necessary to improve the efficiency of litigation. It should be made clear that in the case of guilty plea, even if the protection of the defendant’s right to regret has a negative impact on improving the efficiency of the lawsuit, the right to regret is the inalienable basic relief right of the defendant, and the law must clearly grant the defendant’s right to regret. In view of the contradiction between the two, this paper combined with 40 cases of judicial practice, from the perspective of empirical research, the court level proposed that the court of second instance should introduce the Internet + prereview conference on the grounds of appeal, and the defendant level proposed to broaden the negotiation space of the defendant’s plea, so as to achieve an appropriate balance between the two sides of the contradiction.