基于AHP-TOPSIS法的乡村中小学课后服务评价研究——以湘西自治州为例
Research on After-School Service Evaluation of Rural Primary and Middle Schools Based on AHP-TOPSIS Method—Taking Xiangxi Autonomous Prefecture as an Example
摘要: 本文通过构建乡村中小学课后服务影响因素评价指标体系,采用AHP分析法确定各影响因素权重,再以湘西自治州为例,运用综合评价法对各县市乡村中小学课后服务进行评价,结合评价结果对乡村中小学课后服务影响因素进行综合评价分析。结果表明,乡村中小学课后服务受学校因素影响较大,其次是政府因素和学生因素。该评价结果与湘西自治州各县市乡村中小学课后服务情况基本相符。
Abstract:
This paper constructs an evaluation index system for factors influencing after-school services in ru-ral primary and secondary schools. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to determine the weights of each influencing factor. Taking Xiangxi Autonomous Prefecture as an example, a com-prehensive evaluation method is employed to assess the after-school services in rural primary and secondary schools in each county and city. The evaluation results are combined with an analysis of the influencing factors of after-school services in rural primary and secondary schools. The results indicate that school factors have the greatest impact on after-school services in rural primary and secondary schools, followed by government factors and student factors. These evaluation results are largely consistent with the after-school service situation in rural primary and secondary schools in various counties and cities of Xiangxi Autonomous Prefecture.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
陈俊珂, 王家欢. 乡村小学课后服务: 教育价值与改进策略[J]. 兵团教育学院学报, 2023, 33(1): 64-69.
|
|
[2]
|
周奇. 课后服务工作可以更细致[J]. 人民教育, 2021(22): 8.
|
|
[3]
|
黄一帆, 周福盛. 高质量乡村学校课后服务的公共性困境及突破[J]. 教育与经济, 2023, 39(2): 60-69.
|
|
[4]
|
王兴洲, 王枬. 文化回应型乡村学校课后服务提升对策[J]. 中国教师, 2022(2): 34-37.
|
|
[5]
|
许锋华, 马祥. “双减”政策下乡村学校课后服务: 意义、困境与优化路径[J]. 当代教育论坛, 2023(4): 98-107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[6]
|
谭雨婕, 杨昕妍, 张仲凤, 等. 基于AHP-TOPSIS法的儿童卧房家具设计研究[J]. 林产工业, 2023, 60(4): 69-74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[7]
|
王向蕊. 教育公平视角下城乡小学课后服务差异分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济宁: 曲阜师范大学, 2022.[CrossRef]
|
|
[8]
|
王丽. 乡村小学课后服务实施存在问题及优化策略研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 晋中: 太原师范学院, 2023.[CrossRef]
|