基于水供给服务流的滇池流域生态补偿区域划分与标准测算研究
Study on Regional Division and Standard Calculation of Ecological Compensation Based on Water Supply and Service Flow in Dian Lake River Basin
DOI: 10.12677/OJNS.2023.116122, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 刘 璇：云南财经大学财政与公共管理学院，云南 昆明
关键词: 水供给服务；生态补偿；优先级；滇池流域；Water Supply Services； Ecological Compensation； Priority； Dian Lake Basin
摘要: 水供给服务流对流域的水循环和水量平衡，以及人类的生存和发展起到至关重要的作用。由于生态系统服务具有流动性和空间异质性，水供给服务的供给和需求往往存在不匹配的问题，而生态补偿是协调相关利益主体、实现流域内经济–社会–生态协调可持续发展的有效手段。本文以滇池流域为例，基于流域2020年土地覆被、气象观测和统计年鉴等数据，采用供需平衡模型计算滇池流域产水量和需水量，利用水供给服务价值量模型计算滇池流域生态补偿额度，采用生态补偿优先级法确定优先受偿区域。结果表示：① 滇池流域生态补偿的支付区，为五华区、盘龙区、呈贡区和官渡区；生态补偿的受偿区，为西山区、晋宁县和嵩明县。② 根据生态补偿优先级的排序，五华区应当率先支付，其次为官渡区、呈贡区和盘龙区；嵩明县应当最先受到补偿，其次为晋宁县、西山区。③ 滇池流域生态补偿总额度为2.47亿元，其中水供给服务每公顷应受偿/支付4535元。
Abstract: Water supply service flow plays a vital role in the water cycle and water balance, as well as the survival and development of human beings. Due to the mobility and spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services, the supply and demand of water supply services often do not match, ecological compensation is an effective means to coordinate the relevant stakeholders and realize the sustainable development of economy, society and ecology in the basin. Taking the Dian Lake River basin as an example, this paper adopted the supply-demand balance model to calculate the water production and water demand of the Dian Lake River basin based on the data of land cover, meteorological observations and statistical yearbook in 2020, the water supply service value model was used to calculate the ecological compensation amount in the Dian Lake River basin, and the priority area was determined by the ecological compensation priority method. The results showed that 1) the payment areas of ecological compensation in the Dian Lake basin were Wuhua District, Panlong District, Chenggong and Guandu District, and the payment areas of ecological compensation were Xishan District, Jinning County and Songming County. 2) According to the priority of ecological compensation, Wuhua District should be the first to pay, followed by Guandu District, Chenggong and Panlong District, and Songming County should be the first to receive compensation, followed by Jinning County and Xishan District. 3) The total amount of ecological compensation in the Dian Lake River basin is 247 million yuan, of which 4,535 yuan per hectare is compensation payment for water supply services.
文章引用：刘璇. 基于水供给服务流的滇池流域生态补偿区域划分与标准测算研究[J]. 自然科学, 2023, 11(6): 1029-1036. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJNS.2023.116122

参考文献

[1] 耿翔燕, 李文轩. 中国流域生态补偿研究热点及趋势展望[J]. 资源科学, 2022, 44(10): 2153-2163.
[2] Boithias, L., Acuña, V., Vergoñós, L., Ziv, G., Marcé, R. and Sabater, S. (2014) Assessment of the Water Supply: Demand Ratios in a Mediterranean Basin under Different Global Change Scenarios and Mitigation Alternatives. Science of the Total Environment, 470, 567-577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Khan, I. and Zhao, M.J. (2019) Water Resource Management and Public Preferences for Water Ecosystem Services: A Choice Experiment Approach for Inland River Basin Management. Science of the Total Environment, 646, 821-831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 马琳, 刘浩, 彭建, 吴健生. 生态系统服务供给和需求研究进展[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(7): 1277-1289.
[5] 王丹妮, 郭青云, 王志浩, 林慧龙. 生态系统水供给服务空间流动研究进展[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(3): 1-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Trisurat, Y., Eawpanich, P. and Kalliola, R. (2016) Integrating Land Use and Climate Change Scenarios and Models into Assessment of Forested Watershed Services in Southern Thailand. Environmental Research, 147, 611-620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] 杨枫, 许秋瑾, 宋永会, 等. 滇池流域水生态环境演变趋势、治理历程及成效[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2022, 12(3): 633-643.
[8] 付磊, 李增华. 近20年滇池流域土地利用/覆被变化过程、特征及其生态价值变化研究[J]. 生态经济, 2022, 38(6): 183-191.
[9] 曾广权, 洪尚群, 张星梓, 等. 建立云南省生态补偿机制的研究[M]. 昆明: 云南科技出版社, 2006.
[10] 范弢. 滇池流域水生态补偿机制及政策建议研究[J]. 生态经济, 2010(1): 154-158.
[11] 李森, 何佳, 徐晓梅, 周鸿斌, 王丽. 滇池流域河道整治的发展与展望[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2016, 39(S1): 131-136.
[12] 刘林, 雷冬梅, 冉玉菊, 等. 基于生态系统服务功能的滇池流域关键性生态用地识别[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(11): 277-284.
[13] 王启名, 杨昆, 李立晓, 朱彦辉, 樊贤. 滇池流域水文生态系统服务权衡与协同时空异质性及其归因分析[J/OL]. 生态学报, 2023(12): 1-16. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2031.Q.20221008.1308.008.html
[14] 刘春芳, 王佳雪, 许晓雨. 基于生态系统服务流视角的生态补偿区域划分与标准核算——以石羊河流域为例[J]. 中国人口∙资源与环境, 2021, 31(8): 157-165.
[15] 郭丽洁, 尹小君, 苟贞珍, 等. 基于InVEST模型的阿克苏河流域产水量评估及环境因素影响研究[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 38(2): 216-224.
[16] 温庆, 张刘东, 代启亮. 滇池流域多年ET_0及其影响因素变化趋势分析[J]. 水利水电技术, 2018, 49(12): 27-35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] 温庆, 张刘东, 代启亮. 滇池流域近30年参考蒸腾蒸发量计算方法探讨[J]. 人民珠江, 2018, 39(12): 36-43.
[18] 陈登帅, 李晶, 张渝萌, 张城, 周自翔. 延河流域水供给服务供需平衡与服务流研究[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(1): 112-122.
[19] 邓明翔. 滇池流域生态补偿机制研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 昆明: 云南财经大学, 2012.
[20] 熊伟, 杜雪芳, 左芸, 等. 石羊河流域生态补偿机制与优化策略研究[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(6): 54-59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[21] 张倩. 黄河流域横向生态补偿的协同治理困境与实践路径[J]. 人民黄河, 2023, 45(8): 54-58+67.
[22] 尹正杰, 庄超, 陈进. 长江干流跨省横向生态补偿机制框架探讨[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2023, 40(7): 16-21.