企业环境违法规制中的和解研究
Research on Reconciliation in the Regulation of Corporate Environmental Violations
摘要: 企业环境违法行为所带来的损害结果并不具有即时性,对环境污染、生态破坏后的危害会在多领域、多层次的社会生产生活产生以潜移默化的影响方式展现出来并且环境犯罪在治理中仍有很多现实障碍,所以需要利用企业环境违法规制中和解的方式来打造企业环境犯罪治理的新路径,提升生态环境的保护程度。企业环境违法的规制体系由民事规制、行政规制、刑事规制组成,将企业环境违法的类型进行合理的分类,在不同的规制下去拆解企业违法和解路径。虽然目前企业合规是和解的新趋势,企业环境合规也是企业环境违法规制中和解的重要因素,但企业合规作为舶来品,环境合规作为企业专项合规的一种,在我国仍需要一段时间的实践和发展从而得以本土化,因此在现行的企业环境违法规制中寻求合适的企业环境违法和解有一定的积极意义。
Abstract:
The damage caused by corporate environmental violations is not immediate. The harm caused by environmental pollution and ecological damage will have a subtle impact on social production and life in multiple fields and at multiple levels. There are still many practical obstacles in the governance of environmental crimes. Therefore, it is necessary to use the reconciliation approach in the regulation of corporate environmental violations to create a new path for the governance of corporate environmental crimes and enhance the protection of the ecological environment. The regulatory system for corporate environmental violations consists of civil, administrative, and criminal regulations. It classifies the types of corporate environmental violations into reasonable categories and dismantles the corporate illegal reconciliation path under different regulations. Although corporate compliance is currently a new trend in reconciliation, and corporate environmental compliance is also an important factor in reconciliation in the regulation of corporate environmental violations, corporate compliance as an exotic concept and environmental compliance as a special type of corporate compliance still need some time of practice and development to be localized in China. Therefore, it is of certain positive significance to seek a suitable reconciliation of corporate environmental violations in the current regulation of corporate environmental violations.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
吕忠梅. 环境法新视野[M]. 第3版. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2019.
|
|
[2]
|
李洋. 企业环境违法规制中的和解研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 淄博: 山东理工学, 2022.
|
|
[3]
|
吕忠梅. 民法典绿色条款的类型化构造及与环境法典的衔接[J]. 行政法学研究, 2022(2): 3-17.
|
|
[4]
|
竺效. 环境法入门笔记[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2016.
|
|
[5]
|
何璐希. 生态环境损害赔偿磋商协议纠纷与程序应对研究[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 43(6): 110-117.
|
|
[6]
|
张武丁. 生态环境违法行为处理的三阶段思维[J]. 中国生态文明, 2023(Z1): 126-129.
|
|
[7]
|
陶登贺. 环境犯罪刑事立法的不足与完善[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 兰州: 甘肃政法大学, 2022.
|
|
[8]
|
黄帅. 生态环境修复责任“差序格局”之厘清与适用[J]. 中华环境, 2020(9): 62-64.
|
|
[9]
|
肖娜. 环境民事公益诉讼原告处分权限制研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南政法大学, 2020.
|
|
[10]
|
李木子. 民事公益诉讼调解制度研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 沈阳: 辽宁大学, 2022.
|
|
[11]
|
黄森林. 环境民事公益诉讼诉讼请求的处分权及其限制研究[J]. 西部学刊, 2020(24): 86-89.
|
|
[12]
|
韩香. 论民事诉讼处分原则的限制与纠正——兼论我国民事诉讼处分原则规定的完善[J]. 理论界, 2011(8): 47-50.
|
|
[13]
|
胡洁人. 当前新型社会纠纷解决机制研究[J]. 当代法学, 2012, 26(2): 3-11.
|
|
[14]
|
赵星寒. 环境行政执法和解制度研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南昌: 华东交通大学, 2022.
|
|
[15]
|
郭静. 环境犯罪治理中刑事和解适用性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西北大学, 2023.
|
|
[16]
|
刘蕊. 环境犯罪治理中刑事和解扩张适用及法律规制[J]. 理论月刊, 2020(7): 133-143.
|