混淆行为规制中“有一定影响”的认定
Determination of “Some Influence” in the Regulation of Confusing Acts
摘要: 新反不正当竞争法于2018年1月1日生效施行,其中第六条规制混淆行为专条成为此次修改的亮点之一,被广泛关注和讨论。而“有一定影响”作为认定混淆行为的限定条件,其认定条件模糊给司法实践带来了难题。本文将探讨“有一定影响”进行认定时含义和认定条件不明的问题,分析问题的成因,最后构建出认定“有一定影响”的具体标准。并且考虑引入市场调查的方法,以使混淆行为规制专条真正发挥其积极作用。
Abstract:
The new Anti-Unfair Competition Law came into effect on January 1, 2018. The article 6 of the law on confusing behavior has become one of the highlights of the amendment, which has been widely noticed and discussed. “Certain influence” is the limiting condition for the identification of confusion, and the ambiguity of the determination condition has brought difficulties to the judicial practice. This article will discuss the problem of unclear meaning and conditions for the determination of “certain influence”, analyze the causes of the problem, and finally construct specific criteria for the determination of “certain influence”. It will also consider introducing the method of market survey, so that the special article on regulation of confusing behavior can really play its positive role.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
孔祥俊. 反不正当竞争法原理[M]. 北京: 知识产权出版社, 2005: 107.
|
|
[2]
|
刘继峰. 反不正当竞争法中“一定影响”的语义澄清与意义验证[J]. 中国法学, 2022(4): 186-200.
|
|
[3]
|
黄璞琳. 新<反不正当竞争法>与<商标法>在仿冒混淆方面的衔接问题浅析[N]. 中国工商报, 2022-11-07(007).
|
|
[4]
|
卡多佐. 司法过程的性质[M]. 苏力, 译. 上海: 商务印书馆, 1988: 4.
|
|
[5]
|
肖顺武. 混淆行为法律规制中一定影响的认定[J]. 法学评论, 2018(5): 176-185.
|
|
[6]
|
肖江平. 滥用市场支配地位行为认定中的“正当理由” [J]. 法商研究, 2009(5): 88-96.
|