文旅行业违法所得认定问题立法研究——以《文化市场综合行政执法事项指导目录(2021年版)》为蓝本
Legislative Research on the Identification of Illegal Income in Cultural Tourism Industry—Based on the Guidance Catalogue of Comprehensive Administrative Law Enforcement Matters in Cultural Market (2021 Edition)
DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2023.116931, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 张佳宁:浙江省旅游标准化研究会,浙江 宁波
关键词: 行政处罚违法所得行政执法行政没收Administrative Punishment Illegal Gains Administrative Law Enforcement Administrative Confiscation
摘要: 作为行政处罚种类之一的没收违法所得,在新《行政处罚法》出台之前,长期处于法律内涵释义缺位状态,导致一系列执法难题。理论上产生违法所得的性质之争、违法所得的算法逻辑之争和违法所得的修法更新之争。以文旅行业为例,归纳违法所得认定的立法现状,一是规定没收违法所得与罚款并行;二是规定没收违法所得与没收非法财物等行政没收并列;三是规定不没收违法所得,另处罚款,罚款金额以违法所得为基数。提出文旅行政部门适用违法所得规定的两个执法要点,把握以“不扣除成本为原则,扣除成本为例外”的违法所得认定规则,注意区分“违法所得”与“非法财物”之间的界限。
Abstract: As one of the types of administrative punishment, the confiscation of illegal income, before the introduction of the new “Administrative Punishment Law”, has been in the absence of legal connotation and interpretation for a long time, resulting in a series of law enforcement problems. In theory, there are the dispute about the nature of illegal income, the dispute about the algorithm logic of illegal income and the dispute about the revision and updating of illegal income. Taking the cultural and tourism industry as an example, summarize the legislative status quo of illegal income identification, one is to stipulate the confiscation of illegal income and fine in parallel; second, the confiscation of illegal income and confiscation of illegal property and other administrative confiscation; third, it is stipulated that illegal income shall not be confiscated and a fine shall be imposed, and the amount of the fine shall be based on the illegal income. This paper puts forward two law enforcement points for the administrative departments of cultural tourism to apply the provisions on illegal income, grasp the rule of identifying illegal income with the principle of not deducting cost and the exception of deducting cost, and pay attention to the distinction between “illegal income” and “illegal property”.
文章引用:张佳宁. 文旅行业违法所得认定问题立法研究——以《文化市场综合行政执法事项指导目录(2021年版)》为蓝本[J]. 法学, 2023, 11(6): 6487-6492. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJLS.2023.116931

参考文献

[1] 应松年, 张晓莹. 《行政处罚法》二十四年: 回望与前瞻[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2020, 28(5): 3-18.
[2] 章剑生. 违反行政法义务的责任:在行政处罚与刑罚之间——基于《行政处罚法》第7条第2款之规定而展开的分析[J]. 行政法学研究, 2011(2): 10-24.
[3] 姜明安. 论行政执法[J]. 行政法学研究, 2003(4): 4-11.
[4] 张树义. 论抽象行政行为与具体行政行为的划分标准[J]. 中国法学, 1993(1): 60-64+59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 马怀德. 《行政处罚法》修改中的几个争议问题[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2020, 23(4): 6-16.
[6] 余凌云研究团队, 余凌云. 论价格违法行为行政处罚制度的修改与完善[J]. 法治现代化研究, 2022, 6(2): 1-16.
[7] 张东昌. 证券市场没收违法所得与民事赔偿责任的制度衔接[J]. 证券法苑, 2017, 23(5): 407-422.
[8] 王思涵. 行政法中的没收违法所得研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2022.[CrossRef
[9] 苑晟. “价格欺诈违法行为”违法所得研究[J]. 中国价格监管与反垄断, 2019(10): 49-56.
[10] 熊樟林. 立法上如何安排行政没收? [J]. 政法论坛, 2022, 40(4): 29-43.
[11] 张琦蕊, 曾冰. 文旅领域违法所得“净额说”之局限——以“不合理低价游”为例[J]. 太原城市职业技术学院学报, 2023(5): 182-184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 朱加嘉. 行政违法所得的司法认定[J]. 人民司法, 2013(11): 106-111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef