认罪认罚从宽制度背景下被告人上诉权问题研究
Research on the Defendant’s Right of Appeal under the Background of Leniency System of Guilty Plea
摘要: 2018年,《刑事诉讼法》进行了第三次修改,这次修改的亮点之一就是增加了认罪认罚从宽制度。但是,由于法律并未就认罪认罚从宽制度的具体问题做出明确的规定,其在司法实践中存在很多问题,比如被告人的上诉权是否应该保留。保护好被告人的上诉权是一项系统工程,本文将从认罪认罚从宽制度中被告人的上诉权的理论争议出发,结合在司法实践出现的一些问题,再提出对被告人上诉权进行适当限制、规范检察院的抗诉程序、促进值班律师维护被告人权益的积极性等措施来完善刑诉认罪认罚从宽制度背景下被告人的上诉权的相关问题。
Abstract: In 2018, the Criminal Procedure Law was revised for the third time, and one of the highlights of this revision is the addition of a lenient plea system. However, there are many problems in judicial prac-tice, such as whether the defendant’s right of appeal should be retained, because the law does not make clear provisions on the specific problems of the plea leniency system. Protecting the defendant’s right of appeal is a systematic project. This paper starts from the theoretical disputes about the defendant’s right of appeal in the lenient system of guilty plea, and combines some problems in judicial practice. Then, it puts forward some measures to limit the defendant’s right of appeal, standardize the procuratorate’s protest procedure, and promote the duty lawyer’s enthusiasm to safeguard the defendant’s rights and interests to improve the defendant’s right of appeal under the background of criminal prosecution and guilty plea leniency system.
文章引用:杨旭艳. 认罪认罚从宽制度背景下被告人上诉权问题研究[J]. 法学, 2023, 11(6): 6493-6499. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJLS.2023.116932

参考文献

[1] 廖清顺. 浅谈认罪认罚从宽制度的四个维度——认罪认罚从宽制度问题反思[J]. 法律适用, 2020(5): 101-111.
[2] 骆锦勇. 认罪认罚案件的上诉和抗诉问题[N]. 人民法院报, 2019-08-08(6).
[3] 陈卫东. 诉讼爆炸与法院应对[J]. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(3): 13-22.
[4] 陈卫东, 郝银钟. 被告人诉讼权利与程序救济论纲——基于国际标准的分析[J]. 中外法学, 1999(3): 78-83.
[5] 樊崇义, 李思远. 认罪认罚从宽程序中的三个问题[J]. 人民检察, 2016(8): 8-9.
[6] 陈瑞华. 认罪认罚从宽制度的若干争议问题[J]. 社会科学文摘, 2017(5): 78-80.
[7] 孔令勇. 被告人认罪认罚自愿性的界定及保障——基于“被告人同意理论”的分析[J]. 法商研究, 2019(3): 63-75.
[8] 米凯. 认罪认罚从宽案件被追诉人反悔的应对机制构建[J]. 文化学刊, 2022(1): 220-223.
[9] 杨波. 刑事诉讼事实形成机理探究[J]. 中国法学, 2022(2): 163-183.