天山南坡季节河流——黄水沟生态流量阈值分析
Analysis of Ecological Flow Threshold of Seasonal River—Huangshuigou in the Southern Slope of the Tianshan Mountains
DOI: 10.12677/JWRR.2023.125057, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 李 江, 徐永波, 牛 英：新疆维吾尔自治区塔里木河流域管理局，新疆 库尔勒；朱成刚*：中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所，荒漠与绿洲生态国家重点实验室，新疆 乌鲁木齐
关键词: 干旱区；内陆河；生态流量；径流；水文学方法；Arid Regions； Inland River； Ecological Instream Flow； Runoff； Hydrological Method
摘要: 科学确定内陆河流生态流量阈值是保障干旱区水生态安全和生态环境健康的重要基础。基于1980~2020年实测径流资料，采用水文学多种方法，对新疆开都河流域黄水沟的生态流量和下游生态水量阈值分河段进行分析显示，作为典型的干旱区山溪性季节河流，黄水沟山区段为长流水河段，应保障其生态基流以保护山区水生态；出山口以下季节性河段依据生态保护目标科学确定适宜生态水量更为合理。基于Qp法确定的黄水沟水文站断面的年内丰水期(5~10月)生态流量为3.90 m3/s，年内枯水期(11月~翌年4月)生态流量2.46 m3/s；结合黄水沟水文站至入博斯腾湖河段多年平均河损，以及黄水沟防洪和黄水沟下游生态环境保育需求，计算分析确定入博斯腾湖南大闸断面年内丰水期多年平均最小入湖生态水量为0.20亿m3。
Abstract: It is an important basis to scientifically determine the ecological instream flow of inland rivers for ensur-ing water-ecological security and eco-environmental health in arid areas. Based on the measured runoff data from 1980 to 2020, the ecological instream flow and the downstream basic ecological water require-ment of the Huangshuigou River in the Kaidu River Basin of Xinjiang were analyzed by various hydrologi-cal methods. As a typical seasonal mountainous river in arid area, mountainous section of Huangshuigou River upstream is a long-flowing river section, and its ecological base flow should be guaranteed to protect the upstream water ecology. It is more reasonable to scientifically determine the basic ecological water requirement according to the goal of ecological protection in the seasonal lower reaches. Based on the QP method, the ecological instream flow of the upstream section at Huangshuigou hydrological station is 3.90 m3/s during the flood season of the year (May-October) and 2.46 m3/s in the dry season (November-April) of the year. Considering the average annual river loss from the Huangshuigou hydrological station to the section of the river flows into the Bosten Lake, as well as the flood control safety and the ecological and en-vironmental conservation needs of the lower reaches of the river, the average annual minimum ecological water volume in the flood season is not less than 0.20 billion m3.
文章引用：李江, 徐永波, 牛英, 朱成刚. 天山南坡季节河流——黄水沟生态流量阈值分析[J]. 水资源研究, 2023, 12(5): 519-529. https://doi.org/10.12677/JWRR.2023.125057

参考文献

[1] 王西琴, 刘昌明, 杨志峰. 生态及环境需水量研究进展与前瞻[J]. 水科学进展, 2002, 13(4): 507-514. WANG Xiqin, LIU Changming and YANG Zhifeng. Research advance in ecological water demand and environmental water de-mand. Advances in Water Science, 2002, 13(4): 507-514. (in Chinese)
[2] 徐宗学, 武玮, 于松延. 生态基流研究进展与挑战[J]. 水力发电学报, 2016, 35(4): 7-10. XU Zongxue, WU Wei and YU Songyan. Ecological baseflow: Progress and challenge. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2016, 35(4): 7-10. (in Chinese)
[3] 陈昂, 隋欣, 廖文根, 等. 我国河流生态基流理论研究回顾[J]. 中国水利水电科学研究院学报, 2016, 14(6): 401-411. CHEN Ang, SUI Xin, LIAO Wengen, et al. Review study on instream ecological baseflow in China. Journal of China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, 2016, 14(6): 401-411. (in Chinese)
[4] ABBASPOUR, M., NAZARIDOUST, A. Determination of environmental water requirements of Lake Urmia, Iran: An ecological approach. International Journal of Envi-ronmental Studies, 2007, 64(2): 161-169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] POFF, N. L., MATTHEWS, J. H. Environmental flows in the anthropo-cene: Past progress and future prospects. Environmental Sustainability, 2013, 5(6): 667-675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] DAKOVA, S., UZUNOV, Y. and MANDADJIEV, D. Low flow—The river’s ecosystem limiting factor. Ecological Engineering, 2000, 16(1): 167-174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] GLEICK, P. H. Water in crisis: Paths to sustainable water use. Eco-logical Applications, 1998, 8(3): 571-579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] 刘昌明. 中国21世纪水供需分析: 生态水利研究[J]. 中国水利, 1999(10): 18-20. LIU Changming. Analysis of water supply and demand in China in the 21st century. China Water Resources, 1999(10): 18-20. (in Chinese)
[9] 魏健, 潘兴瑶, 孔刚, 等. 基于生态补水的缺水河流生态修复研究[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2020, 31(1): 64-76. WEI Jian, PAN Xingyao, KONG Gang, et al. Study on ecological restoration of water-deficient rivers based on ecological water supplement method. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2020, 31(1): 64-76. (in Chinese)
[10] 田若谷, 李怀恩, 刘铁龙. 河道生态基流保障引起的农业损失量计算[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2019, 30(5): 111-116. TIAN Ruogu, LI Huaien and LIU Tielong. Calculation of agricultural loss caused by river ecological basic flow protection. Jour-nal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2019, 30(5): 111-116. (in Chinese)
[11] 成波, 李怀恩, 黄康, 等. 基于河道生态基流保障的农田生态系统服务价值损失量研究[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2018, 29(4): 255-260. CHENG Bo, LI Huaien, HUANG Kang, et al. Study on the farmland ecosystem services value loss based on the river ecological base flow protection. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2018, 29(4): 255-260. (in Chinese)
[12] 徐宗学, 李鹏, 侯昕玥. 河道生态基流理论基础与计算方法研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2019, 41(10): 119-127. XU Zongxue, LI Peng and HOU Xinyue. Theoretical basis and estimation method for ecological baseflow. Yellow River, 2019, 41(10): 119-127. (in Chinese)
[13] 杨露, 侯精明, 王盼, 等. 基于高效高精度栖息地模型的生态流量研究[J]. 水力发电学报, 2023, 42(1): 77-85. YANG Lu, HOU Jingming, WANG Pan, et al. Study on ecological flows based on high-efficiency and high-accuracy habitat model. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2023, 42(1): 77-85. (in Chinese)
[14] 涂晶晶, 陈森林, 艾学山, 等. 河流生态流量特征图及生态流量评价方法[J]. 水资源保护, 2015, 31(1): 99-105. TU Jingjing, CHEN Senlin, AI Xueshan, et al. Diagram of river ecological flow characteristics and evaluation method of ecologi-cal flow. Water Resources Protection, 2015, 31(1): 99-105. (in Chinese)
[15] 阿膺兰, 胡鹏, 曾庆慧, 等. 基于底栖动物响应特征的洮儿河生态流量目标适应性分析[J]. 水资源保护, 2023, 39(3): 253-260. A Yinglan, HU Peng, ZENG Qinghui, et al. Adaptability analysis of ecological flow based on response characteristics of benthos in the Taoer River. Water Resources Protection, 2023, 39(3): 253-260. (in Chinese)
[16] 南军虎, 刘一安, 陈垚, 等. 裁弯河道内生物栖息地改造及生态流量估算[J]. 水资源保护, 2022, 38(3): 189-197. NAN Junhu, LIU Yian, CHEN Yao, et al. Reconstruction of biological habitat and ecological flow estimation in curving cut-off river channel. Water Resources Protection, 2022, 38(3): 189-197. (in Chinese)
[17] 季小兵, 马玉其, 王新友, 等. 基于1960-2018年实测径流与水文学方法的开都河生态流量分析[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2020, 31(6): 17-23, 30. JI Xiaobing, MA Yuqi, WANG Xinyou, et al. Analysis of ecological instream flow of Kaidu River based on hydrological meth-ods and measured runoff data from 1960 to 2018. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2020, 31(6): 17-23, 30. (in Chinese)
[18] CANADELL, J. G., MOONEY, H. A., BALDOCCHI, D. D., et al. Commentary: Carbon metabolism of the ter-restrial biosphere: A multi-technique approach for improved understanding. Ecosystems, 2000, 3(2): 115-130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[19] CHEN, Y. N., LI, Z., FAN, Y. T., et al. Progress and prospects of climate change impacts on hydrology in the arid region of Northwest China. Environmental Research, 2015, 139: 11-19.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] 徐新良, 王靓, 蔡红艳. “丝绸之路经济带”沿线主要国家气候变化特征[J]. 资源科学, 2016, 38(9): 1742-1753. XU Xinliang, WANG Liang and CAI Hongyan. Spatial-temporal characteristics of climate change in the Silk Road Economic Belt. Resources Science, 2016, 38(9): 1742-1753. (in Chinese)
[21] 王会军, 唐国利, 陈海山, 等. “一带一路”区域气候变化事实、影响及可能风险[J]. 大气科学学报, 2020, 43(1): 1-9. WANG Huijun, TANG Guoli, CHEN Hanshan, et al. The Belt and Road region climate change: Facts, impacts and possible risks. Transactions of Atmospheric Sciences, 2020, 43(1): 1-9. (in Chinese)
[22] Yao, T. D., Bolch, T., Chen, D., et al. The imbalance of the Asian water tower. Nature Review Earth & Environment, 2022, 3: 618-632.[CrossRef] 
[23] 赖锡军, 汪德爟. 山溪性河流水动力学耦合模型研究[J]. 河海大学学报, 2002, 30(3): 57-60. LAI Xijun, WANG Deguan. Study on hydraulic coupling model for mountainous rivers. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), 2002, 30(3): 57-60. (in Chinese)
[24] 朱敏翔, 杨柳, 杨超, 等. Tennant法在河流生态基流计算中的适用性探讨——以福建省东南沿海地区为例[J]. 人民长江, 2020, 51(4): 59-64. ZHU Minxiang, YANG Liu, YANG Chao, et al. Applicability of Tennant method in rivers in southeast coastal areas of Fujian Province. Yangtze River, 2020, 51(4): 59-64. (in Chinese)