及物性视角下Netflix可持续报告的生态话语分析
Ecological Discourse Analysis of Netflix’s En-vironmental Report Based on Transitivity System
DOI: 10.12677/ML.2023.1112773, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 王 倩*, 陈明芳:武汉工程大学外语学院,湖北 武汉
关键词: 生态话语分析及物性系统NetflixEcological Discourse Analysis Transitivity System Netflix
摘要: 本文在系统功能语言学框架下对Netflix2021可持续报告(ESG报告)进行生态话语分析,重点通过探讨概念功能中及物性系统中的过程和参与者来确定该报告的生态取向。研究发现,该报告中并没有出现较为明显的有益性生态取向,也不会给读者带来正面的生态引导,此结果也进一步提示其它企业在撰写可持续报告这类典型的生态话语时,除了需要关注到作为ESG报告基本的信息披露问题,还应注意在语言层面尽可能多地配置生态元素,进而书写更有益于环境的生态故事。
Abstract: This paper conducts an ecological discourse analysis of Netflix’s latest 2021 Sustainability report (ESG Report) released on March 30, 2022 under the guide of the framework of systemic-functional linguistics, focusing on the process and participants in the transitivity system to determine the eco-logical orientation of the report. The results show that there is no obvious beneficial ecological ori-entation in Netflix’s sustainability report, which means it will not bring positive ecological guidance to readers. This result further suggests that when writing typical ecological discourse such as sus-tainability report, enterprises should not only pay attention to the basic information disclosure of ESG report, but also take as much configuring ecological elements as possible into consideration at the language level, so as to write ecological stories that are more beneficial to the environment.
文章引用:王倩, 陈明芳. 及物性视角下Netflix可持续报告的生态话语分析[J]. 现代语言学, 2023, 11(12): 5769-5774. https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2023.1112773

参考文献

[1] 谢煜, 温作民. 国内外企业社会责任报告标准及其应用的比较研究[J]. 生态经济, 2015, 31(12): 79-83.
[2] 盛明泉, 余璐, 王文兵. ESG与家族企业全要素生产率[J]. 财务研究, 2022(2): 58-67.
[3] 袁蓉丽, 江纳, 刘梦瑶. ESG研究综述与展望[J]. 财会月刊, 2022(17): 128-134.
[4] Alexander, R. and Stibbe, A. (2014) From the Analysis of Ecological Discourse to the Ecological Analysis of Discourse. Language Sciences, 41, 104-110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 何伟. “生态话语分析”: 韩礼德模式的再发展[J]. 外语教学, 2021, 42(01): 20-27.
[6] Stibbe, A. (2015) Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By. Routledge, London.
[7] 赵会娟, 关宁静, 王慧若男, 薛蓉娜. ESG框架下上市快递企业社会责任报告实质性评价[J]. 珞珈管理评论, 2023(1): 75-95.
[8] 夏蓉, 徐珺. 基于系统功能语言学的企业社会责任生态话语分析[J]. 中国外语, 2020, 17(4): 33-42.
[9] 黄国文, 陈旸. 自然诗歌的生态话语分析——以狄金森的《一只小鸟沿小径走来》为例[J]. 外国语文, 2017, 33(2): 61-66.
[10] 胡壮麟, 朱永生, 张德禄, 李战子. 系统功能语言学概论[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2005.
[11] Halliday, M.A.K. (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd Edition, Hodder Educa-tion Publishers, London.
[12] 何伟, 魏榕. 国际生态话语之及物性分析模式构建[J]. 现代外语, 2017, 40(5): 597-607+729.
[13] 于晖, 王丽萍. 生态话语及物性分析模式探究——以教育语篇为例[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2020(6): 43-54+120+148.
[14] 曹进, 杨明托. 基于及物性系统的网络新闻生态话语分析[J]. 西北师大学报(社会科学版), 2022, 59(2): 136-144.
[15] Meyer, J. and Land, R. (2005) Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge (2): Epistemological Considerations and a Conceptual Framework for Teaching and Learning. Higher Education, 49, 373-388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef